Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal battle between MiniMax and Hollywood studios over copyright infringement may be reaching a pivotal moment, as MiniMax asserts its non-infringement stance while Hollywood shifts towards collaboration with AI companies like OpenAI [2][17]. Group 1: Legal Context and Allegations - In September 2025, Disney, Universal Pictures, and Warner Bros. filed a lawsuit against MiniMax, claiming its AI tool, "Hai Luo AI," infringed copyrights by using protected content for training, generating, and promoting outputs [4][6]. - The plaintiffs argue that the AI tool has memorized copyrighted works rather than merely learning abstract styles, and that MiniMax has promoted infringing content on its platforms [6][10]. Group 2: MiniMax's Defense - MiniMax's defense in its prospectus includes the "tool neutrality" argument, stating that the AI generates content based solely on user input without intent to infringe [7][8]. - The company emphasizes that it does not profit directly from the alleged infringing content, positioning its tool as a legitimate creative resource [7][12]. Group 3: Financial Implications of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit could potentially involve claims for damages related to approximately 500 registered works, with a maximum statutory damage claim of $7.5 million if the plaintiffs prevail [10][12]. - MiniMax argues that the actual number of works eligible for statutory damages is likely lower than claimed, and that even in a worst-case scenario, the financial impact would be manageable given the company's resources [12][13]. Group 4: Industry Trends and Collaborations - The industry is witnessing a shift from confrontation to collaboration, as exemplified by Disney's recent investment in OpenAI and the opening of its IP for AI use, indicating a new approach to managing copyright in the AI landscape [17][19]. - This trend suggests that copyright holders are beginning to see the value in participating in the AI ecosystem rather than solely relying on litigation [19][20].