Core Viewpoint - The court ruled in favor of Xuanchang City Pang Donglai Trading Group Co., Ltd. in a defamation case against an individual named Duan, ordering Duan to issue a public apology and pay 400,000 yuan in damages for negative comments made about the company's products on social media [1][6]. Group 1: Case Background - On January 30, 2025, Duan reported issues with a red women's underwear purchased from Pang Donglai, claiming it caused allergic reactions and color fading [2]. - Pang Donglai's staff engaged with Duan to address the complaints, including medical assistance, and later conducted product testing which confirmed the items met quality standards [3][4]. - Duan's video criticizing the product garnered over 12 million views, significantly impacting the company's reputation [2][4]. Group 2: Court Findings - The court determined that Duan, as a self-media practitioner with a large following, should have verified the claims before posting, recognizing the potential harm to the company's reputation [5][6]. - The ruling emphasized the causal relationship between Duan's actions and the negative impact on Pang Donglai, leading to the decision to award damages [5][6]. Group 3: Company Profile - Pang Donglai Trading Group is a notable player in the retail sector, ranking 46th in the 2023 China Chain Store 100 list, with sales of 10.7 billion yuan in 2023 and projected sales of 16.9 billion yuan in 2024 [4]. - The company has a strong brand presence and is committed to protecting its reputation against defamation and misinformation [11][17].

5月14日18时许，@小米法务部 发文称： 近日，就小米公司与自媒体"民之力"（又名"网络一兵"）网络侵权责任纠纷一案，法院作出一审判决。 法院认定被告存在侮辱、诽谤行为，侵害了小米公司的名誉权。 判令被告删除在抖音、头条、哔哩哔 哩、西瓜视频、快手、微信视频号、微信公众号平台账号内发布的侵权内容， 发布声明消除给小米公 司造成的负面影响，并赔偿小米公司各项损失共计6万元 。 法院认为：被告发表的言论造成小米公司社会评价的降低，且超出舆论监督的合理范围。被告发表的部 分言论具有明确的侮辱、贬损性，且缺乏事实依据，构成侮辱、诽谤，侵犯了小米公司名誉权。 目前一审判决已生效。 者"民之力" "网络一兵"账号的注册及使用者。 记者查询发现，"网络一兵"已于5月2日在哔哩哔哩上发布对雷军及小米公司的道歉信。 本人在 2023年5月至2024年10月期间曾使 用上述账号发布了针对雷军先生及小米公司的多条视 频内容,视频中存在大量侮辱性、贬损性的不实内 容。这些视频造成公众对雷军先生及小米公司产生负 面认知,对雷军先生及小米公司品牌形象均造成了严 重的损害。 经法院判决认定,我的行为严重地侵犯 了雷军先生及小米公司的名誉 ...