Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the deceptive marketing practices surrounding weight loss products, where seemingly genuine consumer experiences are actually orchestrated by businesses to lure customers into purchasing high-priced items [1][2]. Group 1: Marketing Tactics - Social media platforms are flooded with enticing weight loss posts that promise quick results, such as "lose 10 pounds in 15 days" [1]. - These posts are often created by businesses using fake accounts to simulate ordinary consumers, leading to a false sense of credibility [1]. - The marketing strategy exploits the common desire to lose weight without effort, promoting the idea of "effortless weight loss" [1]. Group 2: Health Risks - Many advertised weight loss products, claiming to be "purely plant-based" and "without side effects," may actually contain banned substances like sibutramine and phenolphthalein [2]. - Long-term use of these products can result in serious health issues, including metabolic disorders and heart diseases, with symptoms often appearing only after prolonged use [2]. - The rise of misleading weight loss narratives undermines public trust in scientific weight management and can lead to harmful health practices [2]. Group 3: Regulatory Concerns - There exists a gray industry behind these weight loss posts, characterized by professional "weight loss promoters" who are either hired by unscrupulous businesses or are fake influencers [2]. - The growth of this gray market reveals significant regulatory gaps, including inadequate platform oversight and weak accountability for false advertising [2]. - To combat this issue, regulatory bodies need to implement comprehensive review mechanisms and classify weight loss content under advertising regulations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "pseudo-experts" in agricultural technology on short video platforms, who mislead farmers into purchasing ineffective or harmful products, emphasizing the need for better regulation and oversight from these platforms [4][6][7]. Group 1: Pseudo-Experts and Their Impact - Farmers have been misled by so-called "agricultural technology experts" on short video platforms, resulting in the purchase of ineffective products like a "special insecticide" that turned out to be a water-soluble fertilizer using another company's registration number [5][6]. - The proliferation of pseudo-experts undermines the credibility of genuine agricultural technicians, leading to confusion among farmers about whom to trust for accurate agricultural advice [10][11]. Group 2: Platform Regulation Failures - The platforms exhibit a severe lack of content regulation, allowing pseudo-experts to spread misinformation and promote substandard agricultural products without proper oversight [8][12]. - The algorithms used by these platforms prioritize engagement over accuracy, enabling pseudo-experts to gain more visibility than qualified professionals, which exacerbates the problem [16][18]. Group 3: Consequences of Misinformation - The promotion of ineffective agricultural products can lead to significant agricultural damage, such as crop failures and pesticide residue issues, which harm market reputation and consumer health [14][15]. - The article argues that the platforms should bear responsibility for the consequences of promoting these harmful products [15]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - It is crucial to establish a verification system for self-proclaimed experts and improve the review mechanisms for agricultural products listed on these platforms [20][21]. - The recommendation includes optimizing algorithmic recommendations to favor certified experts, thereby cutting off the profit chain for pseudo-experts [23][24].

Group 1 - The article highlights a growing trend of scams targeting the elderly, where fraudsters exploit traditional cultural beliefs and modern technology to deceive victims into spending large sums of money on false promises related to changing their fate through phone numbers [1][2] - Scammers have developed a systematic approach to these scams, utilizing concepts like "digital magnetic field" and "energy frequency" to create a false narrative that phone numbers can dictate one's destiny, thus commodifying superstition [2][3] - The article emphasizes the need for legal action against these scams, revealing the organized nature of the fraud, which includes a chain of accomplices and a well-structured operational model [2][3] Group 2 - There is a pressing need to rebuild public rationality and awareness, as many victims fail to recognize that their fate is influenced by various personal and social factors rather than unscientific beliefs [3] - The article calls for a societal shift towards critical thinking, urging individuals to question the validity of claims made by self-proclaimed "masters" and to seek scientific evidence before accepting such narratives [3]