Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "pseudo-experts" in agricultural technology on short video platforms, who mislead farmers into purchasing ineffective or harmful products, emphasizing the need for better regulation and oversight from these platforms [4][6][7]. Group 1: Pseudo-Experts and Their Impact - Farmers have been misled by so-called "agricultural technology experts" on short video platforms, resulting in the purchase of ineffective products like a "special insecticide" that turned out to be a water-soluble fertilizer using another company's registration number [5][6]. - The proliferation of pseudo-experts undermines the credibility of genuine agricultural technicians, leading to confusion among farmers about whom to trust for accurate agricultural advice [10][11]. Group 2: Platform Regulation Failures - The platforms exhibit a severe lack of content regulation, allowing pseudo-experts to spread misinformation and promote substandard agricultural products without proper oversight [8][12]. - The algorithms used by these platforms prioritize engagement over accuracy, enabling pseudo-experts to gain more visibility than qualified professionals, which exacerbates the problem [16][18]. Group 3: Consequences of Misinformation - The promotion of ineffective agricultural products can lead to significant agricultural damage, such as crop failures and pesticide residue issues, which harm market reputation and consumer health [14][15]. - The article argues that the platforms should bear responsibility for the consequences of promoting these harmful products [15]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - It is crucial to establish a verification system for self-proclaimed experts and improve the review mechanisms for agricultural products listed on these platforms [20][21]. - The recommendation includes optimizing algorithmic recommendations to favor certified experts, thereby cutting off the profit chain for pseudo-experts [23][24].

Group 1 - The 2025 Shanghai Auto Show showcased a shift from "traffic-driven" marketing to a focus on technology and product capabilities, reflecting a more rational approach in the automotive industry [4][5][6] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology's regulations on smart driving advertising have led to a more cautious and safety-oriented promotion of intelligent driving technologies [4][5] - The emergence of domestic supply chains has been highlighted, with over 50 domestic and international parts suppliers participating prominently in the exhibition, indicating the rise of China's automotive supply chain [9][10] Group 2 - The acceleration of localization in smart driving technology was evident, with both domestic and foreign companies collaborating to adapt technologies to the unique conditions of Chinese roads [5][6][7] - Major foreign automakers, including Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Toyota, showcased their electric vehicles prominently, signaling a commitment to the electric vehicle market in China [7][8] - The introduction of flying cars and humanoid robots at the auto show indicates a potential new focus area for the automotive industry, expanding the scope of competition and future mobility solutions [10] Group 3 - The presence of nearly 50 well-known technology, semiconductor, and chip companies at the supply chain exhibition reflects the growing importance of chips in the automotive sector, particularly in the context of electrification and intelligent driving [11][12] - Despite the optimistic developments observed at the auto show, challenges remain, particularly regarding the financial capabilities of domestic supply chain companies to keep pace with rapid technological advancements [12]