特朗普最近为美国争取了大量投资，却不料遭遇了"背刺"，让他此刻的笑容完全消失。7月31日，特朗普向全球超过一百个国家发布了新的关税清单，尤其 是日本、韩国和欧盟等传统盟友，它们在关税压力面前纷纷选择妥协，举起白旗投降。为了进一步施压，特朗普要求欧盟和韩国签署大额的能源采购合同， 迫使它们购买更多的美国能源，这成为了除了对美国制造业投资之外的又一"强制条款"，再次暴露了其不平等的贸易政策。 特朗普对于自己的关税政策极为自信，认为这将大大增加美国的财政收入，成为他继续推行全球贸易改革的强大支持。随着8月1日美国新关税的正式实施， 关税税率最高达到了41%，对那些对美贸易顺差的国家，最低也征收10%的关税。这成为近百年来美国最高的进口商品关税。特朗普深知，短期内这种关税 政策能够缓解美国财政的压力，但从长远来看，美国国内的通胀问题会愈发严重。 然而，事实很快就证明了特朗普关税政策的副作用。8月1日，美国劳工部发布的数据显示，7月非农就业人数急剧下降，失业率出现回升，证明美国经济的 脆弱性。特别是中小型企业在高关税和移民政策的双重压力下，利润严重下滑。当天，美国股市也迎来了剧烈波动，道琼斯工业指数下跌了0.74%，标 ...

新华社北京7月24日电 美国国务院23日表示，已批准一笔总额为3.22亿美元的对外军售，用于向乌克 兰提供"鹰"式防空导弹系统和"布拉德利"步兵战车。提及军售原因，美国总统特朗普说，乌克兰"现在 遭很严重打击"。 这是7月11日在美国首都华盛顿拍摄的美国国务院外景。新华社记者胡友松摄根据美国国防部下属的防 务安全合作局通报，这批军售包括价值1.72亿美元的"鹰"式防空导弹系统及其维护服务，以及价值1.5亿 美元的"布拉德利"步兵战车及其维护、修理、升级等配套设备和服务。 美联社援引特朗普的话报道，乌克兰"现在遭很严重打击"，美国"不得不"运送更多武器，"主要是防御 性武器"。 3月18日，在俄罗斯莫斯科，行人从莫斯科河边走过。新华社记者白雪骐摄自今年1月上台以来，特朗普 政府对乌军援政策反复无常。本月初，五角大楼和白宫宣布暂停对乌部分军援。数日后，特朗普又改 口，称将向乌克兰提供更多武器，并于8日批准向乌克兰运送更多防御性武器。 5月初，美国国务院批准向乌克兰出售总额约3.1亿美元的F-16战机零配件和训练、维护等配套服务。据 美国媒体报道，这笔费用将作为美方投入，折算在美乌根据矿产协议计划建立的矿产开发基金 ...

西班牙《机密报》 7 月 20 日文章，原题：全世界都对美国感到厌烦 美国最显著的特征之一便是其孤岛心 态：地域辽阔，资源丰富，又有两大洋作为天然屏障，许多国民甚至没有意愿探索其他国家。他们沉醉 于本国历史，以至于世界其他地方在其眼中不过是模糊影像。 美国旅游业衰退 退出世界舞台的同时，美国政府在国家层面采取的行动也对其全球形象产生负面影响。以哈佛大学为代 表，美国各大高校都面临资金和福利流失，并在招收外国学生等问题上卷入复杂的法律纠纷，这削弱了 美国对海外科学家、学者以及本国公民的吸引力。 针对参加2024年支持巴勒斯坦游行的学生，美政府吊销其签证甚至实施监禁；蒙面警察在没有搜查令的 情况下带走各个年龄段的黑人，他们不仅要驱逐无证移民，还要将一些非裔美国公民驱逐到萨尔瓦多、 卢旺达或南苏丹；美政府还部署海军陆战队镇压洛杉矶街头抗议……这些戏剧性场景每天都在上演。过 去6个月来美国旅游业衰退，美政府难辞其咎。 世界旅游及旅行理事会的数据显示，在接受调查的184个国家中，美国将是今年唯一一个外国游客消费 下降的国家。总体而言，今年到访美国的国际游客数量仅有2019年的80%。 全方位败坏美国形象 美国政府排斥世 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the news is China's announcement to negotiate and sign a new economic agreement with all 52 African countries that have diplomatic relations with China, which will exempt all export tariffs to China [1][3] - China is prepared to welcome high-quality African products into its market, while also committing to additional support for the least developed countries to help them compete in an open market [3][4] - The new measures are seen as particularly beneficial for relatively developed African countries with industrialized manufacturing bases, allowing them to take advantage of the large Chinese market [3][4] Group 2 - The total trade volume between China and Africa has been rapidly increasing, with a trade surplus for China reaching $62 billion in 2024, raising concerns about potential stagnation in bilateral trade as African purchasing power peaks [4] - In the context of a fragmented global supply chain and trade wars, China aims to extend its manufacturing chain into lower-cost labor regions, thereby reducing production costs and expanding its economic influence [4][10] - Analysts suggest that China's strategy is a calculated move to enhance its market base and economic power, positioning itself as a dominant player in Africa [4][10] Group 3 - The U.S. has previously implemented the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which allowed certain African countries to export to the U.S. duty-free, but this program is facing challenges and may not be renewed [5][6] - The recent U.S.-Africa summit was notably smaller in scale, with only five African countries participating, raising questions about the effectiveness of U.S. engagement in Africa [6][7] - Trump's administration has been criticized for its lack of substantial support for African countries, focusing instead on selective partnerships that align with U.S. economic interests [8][9] Group 4 - China has established itself as the largest trading partner for the majority of African countries, with 52 out of 54 countries trading more with China than with the U.S. as of 2023 [12] - China's investments in infrastructure and strategic sectors in Africa have solidified its dominant position, contrasting with the U.S.'s declining influence in the region [12][10] - The ongoing competition between China and the U.S. in Africa highlights the strategic importance of the continent in global economic dynamics [10][12]

Group 1 - The global civilization dialogue ministerial meeting successfully held is a significant practice of the global civilization initiative, promoting the exchange and mutual learning of world civilizations and human progress [1][2] - The development of civilization has historically been an open and inclusive process, where dialogue is essential for eliminating misunderstandings and overcoming barriers between different civilizations [1] - The current complex global situation, characterized by regional conflicts, poses a challenge to global stability and peace, with some countries promoting isolationism and the theory of civilization conflict [1] Group 2 - The global civilization initiative emphasizes the common attributes of civilization, advocating for mutual respect and exchange among different civilizations, and highlights the importance of dialogue and cooperation in resolving conflicts [1] - China has historically been a practitioner of civilization dialogue and mutual learning, serving as a bridge for cultural exchange between the East and West [2] - The theme of the global civilization dialogue ministerial meeting is "Maintaining Human Civilization Diversity and Promoting World Peace and Development," with over 600 attendees from around 140 countries and regions [2]

Group 1 - The U.S. is set to impose new tariffs on exports from various countries starting August 1, with specific rates to be communicated in letters sent out on July 4 [1] - The deadline for countries to negotiate trade agreements with the U.S. is July 9, after which tariffs will be directly set by the U.S. if no agreement is reached [1] - The U.S. tariff policy is expected to continue beyond Trump's presidency, with businesses advised to prepare for a long-term increase in export costs to the U.S. [3] Group 2 - The EU, Japan, and South Korea have expressed strong opposition to the U.S. tariffs, with significant potential losses for Japanese and European car manufacturers [5] - Japan's automotive industry could face tariffs as high as 25%, while European companies could incur losses exceeding €210 billion [5] - The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with Japan and other U.S. allies seeking greater strategic autonomy and cooperation among East Asian nations [3][8] Group 3 - Trump's comments on Japan's rice supply issues have sparked significant media attention in Japan, highlighting the sensitivity of agricultural trade in the country [6] - Japan's government has firmly stated it will not compromise its agricultural interests in trade negotiations with the U.S. [6] - The dynamics between the U.S. and its East Asian allies are evolving, with countries like South Korea and Japan increasingly asserting their independence from U.S. influence [8]

Group 1 - The NATO summit in The Hague concluded with a push for member countries to increase military spending from 2% to 5% of GDP, although this goal was met with skepticism and opposition from countries like Spain, leading to claims of "symbolic number games" [1][2] - President Trump emphasized that allies should use the additional military spending to purchase American weapons, while French President Macron advocated for the development of European military systems to avoid dependence on the U.S., highlighting the internal divisions within NATO, particularly between the U.S. and Europe [1][8] - NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg promoted the "China threat" narrative to justify increased military spending, raising questions about NATO's intentions as its members already account for 55% of global military expenditure [1][10] Group 2 - The summit was characterized by a brief duration and a vague declaration, which allowed member countries flexibility in interpreting the commitment to the 5% military spending target, reflecting negotiations among countries like Spain that set a maximum of 2.1% [2][4] - Other NATO countries, including Belgium and Luxembourg, are exploring similar flexible spending plans, indicating a broader reluctance to meet the 5% target due to financial constraints [4][5] - The agreement to split the 5% target into 3.5% for core military spending and 1.5% for infrastructure and cybersecurity provides member countries with operational flexibility [5] Group 3 - Trump's approach to NATO spending has been described as transactional, with an expectation that allies must pay for the security guarantees provided by the U.S., raising concerns about the future of collective defense commitments [7][10] - The U.S. arms industry is poised to benefit significantly from increased military spending in Europe, as American defense companies dominate the European arms market [8] - The absence of leaders from key Indo-Pacific nations at the summit raises questions about NATO's efforts to expand its influence in that region, indicating a disconnect between U.S. strategic ambitions and regional realities [9][10]

新华社海牙6月25日电 综述｜北约峰会：象征性的共识 盖不住的矛盾 舆论普遍认为，本次峰会象征意义大于实际内容。欧洲各国在美国政府孤立主义倾向日益明显、本国财 政资源日益窘迫的背景下，要大幅提升军费，不仅面临额外经济负担，也势必引发更多内部矛盾。 匈牙利总理欧尔班25日在出席峰会期间表示，欧洲当前面临的最大威胁并非军事或安全问题，而是在全 球贸易中"失去竞争力"。 荷兰银行经济学家迪维尼指出，3.5%的核心军费支出目标"对大多数北约成员国而言非常不现实，许多 成员国连目前的2%标准都难以达到"。 荷兰最大养老金管理机构APG资产管理公司首席经济学家泰斯·克纳普指出，欧洲国家若要将国防开支 提升至国内生产总值的5%，无非两条路径：要么大幅削减医疗、社会保障和养老金等公共支出，要么 通过加税筹措资金。无论哪条路径，都可能引发社会强烈反弹。 尽管如此，在峰会前的紧急磋商中，西班牙还是坚决反对将军费目标提升至5%，直到最后关头才勉强 接受峰会宣言文本，使得宣言得以通过。西班牙明确表示，仅承诺将国防开支提高至国内生产总值的 2.1%。 比利时、斯洛伐克等国也对过高的军费目标表达担忧，认为短期内难以承受。而特朗普则称，美 ...

Group 1 - The G7 summit will take place from June 15 to 17 in Canada, with significant divisions among member countries on issues like the Russia-Ukraine conflict and climate change, leading to a lack of consensus on a joint communiqué [1][4] - Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau aims to ease tensions with U.S. President Trump and promote trade and security negotiations, avoiding a repeat of the contentious 2018 summit where Trump refused to sign the joint communiqué [1][3] - The summit will feature discussions on various topics, including artificial intelligence, energy security, and global conflicts, with leaders from non-G7 countries like Ukraine, India, Brazil, and Mexico also participating [6][7] Group 2 - The trend of shorter final joint statements has emerged since the 2018 summit, reducing negotiation time and minimizing contentious wording among member countries [7] - The Trump administration's approach has shifted G7's focus back to its original purpose of promoting global economic stability and growth, as indicated by the current agenda set by Canada [7]

以下文章来源于文化纵横 ，作者牛可 文化纵横 . 倡导文化重建，共同思想未来，发掘不一样的深度阅读。 当地时间6日、7日，美国移民与海关执法局等联邦机构在加州洛杉矶、纽约曼哈顿等地针对非法移 民展开执法行动，引发了大量街头对峙和冲突。面对骚乱，特朗普7日下令向洛杉矶部署国民警卫 队，称要"解放洛杉矶"。有分析指出，近日美国在移民问题上的高压政策并非偶然，而是特朗普稳住 选民基本盘、兑现竞选承诺的必然结果。那么，特朗普的核心支持者MAGA群体对移民问题存在何 种倾向？ 本文指出，这类由工人、农民和小城镇居民构成的群体，因经济竞争和文化焦虑孕育出对移民和外来 影响的持久敌意。在对外政策上，MAGA群体往往基于朴素的现实主义思维，奉行孤立主义。二战 后，这种草根美国人脑中根深蒂固的、直觉式的、情感性的孤立主义被自由国际主义议程所掩盖。然 而孤立主义没有消失，在产业-社会结构不可逆的历史变迁之下，它随特朗普的出现重新抬头。与此 同时，在对外政策上曾排斥基层民众的精英政治已演变为党派化的民粹政治，白人孤立主义的基因得 以从历史深处走向政治前台。 作者指出，特朗普的上台不是对历史常态的一次偏离，支持特朗普上台的MAGA群 ...