Group 1 - The core factors influencing the pricing strategy of urban investment bonds from a mid-term perspective (1-3 years) are government credit, regional economic fundamentals, and debt management mechanisms, while market sentiment and investor factors may also play significant roles under specific conditions [1][9][39] - Government credit, regional economic fundamentals, and debt management mechanisms are interrelated, where one can infer the others; regions with strong government credit tend to have better debt management capabilities for urban investment platforms and state-owned enterprises [1][14] - The "GDP Rise Roadmap" serves as a framework for constructing an analysis system for regional economic fundamentals, emphasizing the importance of industrial, real estate, and service sectors, along with fiscal revenue and debt ratios [2][24] Group 2 - A simplified indicator system is proposed to measure the economic fundamentals of a region, including industrial value-added, real estate development investment, and service sector performance, which can provide a more logical and efficient way to assess local economic conditions [3][28] - The debt management mechanism should be assessed through various indicators, including the "broad debt ratio" and the structure of interest-bearing debt, to understand the local government's capacity for debt control and resolution [3][30] - The mid-term factors influencing urban investment bond pricing require 1 to 3 years to gradually form a market consensus, which is essential for accurately reflecting government credit and regional economic conditions in bond valuations [39]