Core Viewpoint - The article discusses two prominent investment philosophies: Warren Buffett's focus on understanding one's own capability circle and Ray Dalio's all-weather diversified allocation strategy, questioning which approach is more beneficial for investors [1][2][3]. Group 1: Investment Philosophy - Buffett's principle of "do not invest in what you do not understand" is widely recognized, yet many investors confuse familiarity with true understanding [3][5]. - Dalio's strategy emphasizes diversification, but investors often fall into the trap of diversifying without understanding the underlying correlations, leading to ineffective risk management [5][11]. Group 2: Understanding Risk - True understanding in investing does not equate to predicting price movements; it involves comprehending potential losses and their probabilities [6][9]. - The article highlights that overconfidence stemming from cognitive biases can be more detrimental than a lack of knowledge [8][17]. Group 3: Data Insights - Historical data from 2005 to 2025 indicates that a stock-bond allocation reduces maximum drawdown by 15% compared to a pure A-share investment [16]. - Further diversification into global assets, including U.S. stocks and gold, minimizes drawdown while maintaining returns, validating both Buffett's and Dalio's investment principles [16][17]. Group 4: Bridging Understanding and Diversification - The article suggests that a balanced approach can be achieved by integrating Buffett's focus on understanding with Dalio's diversification, allowing for a more robust risk-return profile [17].