全球经济体系

Search documents
01年中国加入WTO,美国国会很不情愿,而克林顿为何站出来力挺?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-30 04:04
中国入世谈判:一场历时15年的经济外交博弈 1998年,中国主动提出降低关税,展现诚意,但欧美国家仍以政治因素为由设置障碍。在随后的谈判中,中国与欧洲更换了四任谈判代表,而美国更是换了 五任。美国对中国的警惕由来已久,尤其在苏联解体后,美国将中国视为亚太地区的潜在对手。许多美国政客担心,中国加入WTO后经济腾飞,可能威胁 美国的战略利益。 为何中国必须加入WTO? 1986年,中国正式向关税及贸易总协定(GATT,世贸组织WTO的前身)递交了重新加入的申请。然而,这场入世之路远比预想的漫长——中国用了15年时 间,历经无数艰难谈判,才最终叩开WTO的大门。这场没有硝烟的"经济外交战争",见证了中国为融入全球经济体系所付出的巨大努力。 漫长的等待与谈判的开启 尽管中国早在1986年就提交了申请,但由于GATT的审议流程复杂,加上1995年WTO取代GATT的机构调整,中国的入世进程一度停滞。直到1995年底,真 正的多边谈判才正式启动。根据WTO规则,中国需要获得绝大多数成员国的同意才能加入。为此,中国制定了"先亚洲,后欧美"的谈判策略。 1997年,经过艰苦磋商,中国与印度尼西亚等亚洲国家率先达成协议。然而, ...
美媒发愁:特朗普给了中国黄金机遇,让他们赢得全世界
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-04-04 08:05
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" on global trade, highlighting that while these tariffs may negatively impact the U.S. economy, they also present an opportunity for China to strengthen its relationships with other countries and potentially reshape global trade dynamics [1][3][4]. Group 1: Impact on Global Trade - Trump's tariffs, which include a 10% baseline tariff on all trade partners and higher rates for specific countries, have drawn criticism from U.S. allies, indicating a shift in international relations [3][5]. - The tariffs are expected to lead to increased trade among non-U.S. countries, potentially isolating the U.S. from the global economic system established post-World War II [3][5][6]. - Analysts suggest that the tariffs could encourage countries to reduce their dependence on the U.S. and foster a new world order where trade is more diversified [4][5][6]. Group 2: Reactions from China and Allies - China has expressed strong opposition to the tariffs and is coordinating with countries like Russia, Japan, and South Korea to respond effectively [5][6]. - The Chinese government is adopting a more strategic and cautious approach compared to its reaction during the first trade war in 2018, indicating a shift in its diplomatic strategy [4][5]. - U.S. allies, including Japan and the EU, have shown disappointment and are considering retaliatory measures, reflecting a significant change in the dynamics of U.S. alliances [3][4].