Core Insights - The implementation of goal management systems like KPI and OKR is essential for enhancing corporate efficiency, yet many companies struggle with execution, leading to a disconnect between ambitious goal-setting and practical outcomes [1][3] Group 1: Issues in Goal Management - Companies often face "misalignment" in goal-setting, where top management sets targets without considering frontline feedback, resulting in unrealistic expectations [3] - Over-centralization can lead to rigid targets that do not account for market realities, while excessive decentralization may cause divergent departmental goals, ultimately harming overall performance [4] - A lack of dynamic tracking mechanisms during execution can result in significant delays and failures, as companies may only assess progress at quarterly or annual intervals [4] Group 2: Solutions for Improvement - Establishing a "full-link closed-loop" practice system is crucial, which includes a three-tier consensus mechanism involving executives, middle management, and frontline employees to ensure goals are both strategic and feasible [5] - Implementing regular review processes, such as weekly retrospectives and monthly adjustments, can facilitate better tracking and cross-departmental collaboration [5] - Utilizing a dual-dimensional assessment approach that evaluates both results and processes can enhance the quality of goal execution, as demonstrated by successful practices at companies like Huawei and ByteDance [6]