Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core View of the Report The layout of leading public fund managers in on - exchange and off - exchange active and passive funds varies significantly. In the third quarter of 2025, different fund managers showed different performance in terms of scale growth, scale increment, and scale ranking changes in various types of funds such as non - monetary funds, on - exchange ETFs, off - exchange active funds, and off - exchange passive funds [1][2][5]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Overview of the Whole Market Funds - The layout of leading public fund managers in on - exchange and off - exchange active and passive funds is quite different. Some focus on equity ETFs, while others like China Europe Fund and Xingzheng Global Fund mainly focus on off - exchange active and passive funds [1][5]. - In the third quarter of 2025, E Fund, China Asset Management, and Fullgoal Fund had the largest increase in non - monetary fund scale. E Fund led with a scale of 1666.7 billion yuan, and Invesco Great Wall Fund's scale ranking rose by 2 places compared to the second quarter [2][6]. 2. On - exchange ETFs 2.1 Equity ETFs - China Asset Management, E Fund, and Huatai - Peregrine Fund led in equity ETF scale. E Fund had the largest scale increment, and Penghua Fund had the most significant scale ranking change, rising 5 places compared to the second quarter [9]. 2.2 Bond ETFs - Haifutong Fund led in bond ETF scale. Bosera Fund had the largest scale increment, and Penghua Fund's scale ranking rose by 4 places compared to the second quarter [13]. 2.3 Commodity ETFs - Some institutions' scales shrank. Huaan Fund led in commodity ETF scale and also had the largest scale increment. Dacheng Fund's scale ranking rose by 3 places compared to the second quarter [15]. 3. Off - exchange Active Equity Funds 3.1 Active Equity Funds - Yongying Fund had a significant scale increase. E Fund led in active equity fund scale, China Europe Fund had the largest scale increment, and Yongying Fund's scale ranking rose by 11 places after a 48.2 billion - yuan increase in the third quarter compared to the second quarter [18]. 3.2 Active Industry Theme Funds - China Europe Fund led in active industry theme fund scale. Yongying Fund had the largest scale increment, and Ping An Fund's scale ranking rose by 8 places compared to the second quarter [20]. 4. Off - exchange Active Bond Funds 4.1 Pure Bond Funds - In the third quarter, the overall scale of pure bond funds shrank. Bosera Fund led in pure bond fund scale but had the largest scale shrinkage, decreasing by 51.7 billion yuan compared to the second quarter. GF Fund's scale ranking dropped by 4 places compared to the second quarter [23]. 4.2 Fixed - Income + Funds - E Fund led in fixed - income + fund scale. Invesco Great Wall Fund had the largest scale increment, and Huaan Fund and Bosera Fund had relatively large scale ranking changes, rising 10 and 9 places respectively compared to the second quarter [25]. 5. Off - exchange Passive Funds 5.1 Passive Equity Funds - E Fund led in off - exchange passive equity fund scale and also had the largest scale increment. China Europe Fund's scale ranking rose by 6 places compared to the second quarter [27]. 5.2 Passive Fixed - Income Funds - In the third quarter, the overall scale of passive fixed - income funds shrank. GF Fund led in off - exchange passive fixed - income fund scale but its scale decreased by 20.7 billion yuan compared to the second quarter. Huatai - Peregrine Fund had the largest scale shrinkage of 28.1 billion yuan. Shanghai Commercial Bank Fund increased its scale by 2.7 billion yuan and its scale ranking rose by 5 places compared to the second quarter [31].