2025年：法国阵风战机的神话破灭记 2025年本该是法国达索公司举杯庆祝的一年。其旗舰产品阵风战斗机，作为欧洲军工自主的象征，在全球军火市场上风头正盛。从埃及到阿联酋，从中东到 东南亚，订单如雪片般飞来，总销量突破500架，远超法国空军的自用数量。然而，短短几个月内，两场实战失利和一份震撼的体检报告，彻底动摇了这款 战机的神话。 2025年5月7日，印度空军发动代号辛杜尔的大规模空袭，派出72架战机，其中包括被视为王牌的阵风。这些战机挂载着欧洲斯卡普巡航导弹和锤式精确制导 炸弹，目标直指巴基斯坦境内的9个军事据点。 然而，战局并未如印度所愿。巴基斯坦的雷达迅速捕捉到入侵信号，随即派出中巴联合研制的JF-17枭龙和中国制造的歼-10CE升空拦截。凌晨2点25分，双 方在超视距状态下展开对决。 这场空战的关键，并非飞行员的个人技术，而是导弹性能的差距。巴基斯坦的歼-10CE搭载了中国霹雳-15E远程空空导弹，射程接近200公里，而印度阵风 配备的欧洲流星导弹，虽然纸面射程为150公里，但实战中往往大打折扣。这意味着，在远程空战中，印度战机还未进入有效射程，就已经暴露在巴方火力 之下。 最终，巴基斯坦宣布击落6架 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the collective action of European leaders in Washington, which appears to be a desperate attempt to assert their influence in the face of diminishing power and autonomy in geopolitical negotiations [2][4][11] - It emphasizes the underlying issues of Europe's strategic autonomy, economic dependence, and moral standing, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine [11][13][21] Group 1: European Leaders' Actions - European leaders, including Macron and Scholz, rushed to Washington to demonstrate unity and assert their voice in the Ukraine crisis, but their presence felt more like a show of desperation than genuine influence [6][11] - The leaders faced humiliating restrictions during their visit, highlighting their diminished status in negotiations with the U.S. [6][9][11] - The collective action was perceived as a façade, with leaders unable to influence the negotiation dynamics or the outcomes of discussions regarding Ukraine [11][13] Group 2: Strategic and Economic Challenges - The article outlines three major challenges facing Europe: the illusion of strategic autonomy, economic reliance on the U.S. for military support, and the erosion of moral authority in the face of realpolitik [11][21] - Europe's military capabilities are severely limited without U.S. support, as evidenced by the failure of European peacekeeping forces without American satellite guidance [9][11] - Economic dependencies, particularly on Russian energy, pose significant risks to European industries, especially as winter approaches [9][19] Group 3: The Need for Autonomy - The article argues for the necessity of military, energy, and political autonomy for Europe to regain its standing and effectively support Ukraine [15][17][21] - It stresses that without substantial investment in military infrastructure and energy independence, Europe will remain vulnerable and unable to assert its interests [16][19][21] - The call for a unified political decision-making mechanism among EU member states is crucial to overcoming internal divisions and enhancing collective strength [18][21] Group 4: Implications for Ukraine - The article suggests that Ukraine's fate is being used as a bargaining chip in European negotiations, undermining the urgency of support for its defense [13][21] - The leaders' inability to secure immediate and concrete support for Ukraine reflects a broader failure to prioritize genuine assistance over political posturing [21] - The ongoing conflict and the negotiations surrounding it highlight the precarious position of Ukraine, which is caught between the interests of European nations and the U.S. [21]