利率分歧

Search documents
过度装修?美联储罕见发文否认:没有VIP餐厅、没有VIP电梯、没有新水景
华尔街见闻· 2025-07-13 12:13
Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the Federal Reserve's $2.5 billion headquarters renovation project has escalated into a confrontation between Trump and Powell, with the Federal Reserve defending the project against accusations of luxury spending by the White House [1][6]. Group 1: Renovation Project Details - The Federal Reserve has denied claims of including a "VIP restaurant," stating that the Eccles building's meeting rooms are being renovated for dining meetings [4]. - There is no "VIP elevator"; existing elevators are being repaired, including one serving historical meeting rooms, with improvements for accessibility [4]. - The alleged new water feature has been canceled, and only the existing fountain is being restored, while the so-called "garden terrace" refers to the ground lawn in front of the Eccles building [4]. Group 2: Cost Increase Explanation - The Federal Reserve outlined that various factors contributed to the cost increase, including modifications to the original design after discussions with review agencies, discrepancies in actual costs for materials, equipment, and labor, and unforeseen circumstances such as asbestos discovery [5][6]. - The project involves a comprehensive renovation of two historical buildings that have not been updated since the 1930s, including the removal of asbestos and lead contamination, replacement of outdated electrical and plumbing systems, and compliance with modern safety standards [6]. Group 3: Political Implications - The renovation controversy is viewed as a tool for the Trump administration to exert pressure on Powell, with White House advisors intensifying scrutiny over Powell's management of the project [7]. - The White House budget director, Russell Vought, has indicated plans to investigate the renovation project, aiming to uncover any evidence of mismanagement or discrepancies in Powell's testimony to Congress [7]. - This strategy is reminiscent of tactics used by the Nixon administration in 1972 to undermine the credibility of the Federal Reserve [7].