三年前，外国游客来华，最怕的不是语言，而是"卡壳"。 签证麻烦、支付受限、退税排队。现在呢？落地刷外卡进地铁，商场"即买即退"10分钟到账。入境消费的核爆点，从来不是风景，而是摩擦力。 《外国人在中国买买买，背后是一场消费基建革命》 ——免签只是入场券，真正留住钱包的是那套"不见外"的系统能力 消费体验，是国家竞争力的毛细血管。毛细血管通了，血液才会流向每一个角落。这场基建革命，才刚刚开始。 （唐加文，笔名金观平；本文成稿后，经AI审阅校对） 数据很硬：2025年入境外国人同比增长26.4%，免签入境占比超七成；离境退税商品销售额同比增长95.9%，办理退税人数暴增305%。这不是自然 反弹，而是制度重构。免签扩至48国、过境免签口岸增至65个，只是流量闸门；真正变现的是"大额刷卡、小额扫码、现金兜底"的支付闭环，是 跨城退税互认的系统协同。每一个"省心"背后，都是跨部门的精密配合。 为什么此刻爆发？因为体验链打通了。过去入境游像一根筷子——景点再好，支付、退税、交通任一断点，体验就散。现在更像一套餐具，环环 相扣。清晨排队买煎饼，夜晚看沉浸式舞剧，非遗项目预订量同比增长300%。他们买走的不只是商品，而是一 ...

（来源：中国政府采购报） 转自：中国政府采购报 【聚焦评审专家管理】 编者按：评审专家作为政府采购公平公正的"守门人"，其专业素养、职业操守与履职效能直接关系到采 购质量、资金效益乃至营商环境。近年来，从中央到地方，各级政府密集出台新规，对评审专家管理进 行系统性升级。本版特设专栏，深入探讨当前评审专家管理体系改革的深层逻辑、实践挑战与未来方 向，剖析如何构建一支"专业精通、行为规范、监督有效"的现代化评审专家队伍。 探讨评审专家制度结构性失灵缘由及重构路径 ■ 宋军 近年来，因评审专家履职不当而引发的采购风险时有发生。笔者认为，这暴露了从顶层设计到末端执 行、从权力约束到责任归属的系统性失灵。因此，有必要超越对个体操守的质疑，直指制度本身。本文 试图探索评审专家制度结构性失灵缘由及重构路径，以期为相关部门完善评审专家管理制度提供参考。 制度异化：从"专业守门人"到"权责失衡的第三方" 评审专家制度设计的初衷，是引入专业、独立的第三方力量，以弥补"谁采购、谁负责"可能导致的"谁 采购、谁独断"和专业性不足的缺陷。然而，这一制度在运行中发生了双重异化，形成了典型的制度悖 论。 一是过程"黑箱"。虽然全流程电子化 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese real estate market is transitioning from a "high leverage, high turnover, high growth" model to a phase of "stock optimization" and "institutional restructuring" due to unprecedented structural challenges, including negative population growth and declining housing demand [1][3]. Group 1: Population Structure Changes - The birth rate in China has drastically declined, with 2023 recording only 9.02 million births, a birth rate of 6.39‰, down over 50% from 2016 [3][4]. - The core home-buying demographic (ages 25-39) is shrinking, with predictions indicating that by 2030, the annual birth rate may drop below 7 million, leading to sustained population decline [3][8]. - The demand for housing is shifting from "availability" to "quality," as the total housing demand decreases while the need for quality housing increases [9][10]. Group 2: Urbanization Process - China's urbanization rate is nearing its peak, with a current rate of 67%, indicating a shift from "incremental development" to "stock renewal" [12]. - The government is promoting high-quality urban renewal, with various innovative models being explored, such as comprehensive area updates and functional transformation [13]. - The residential quality standards are undergoing a revolution, with new regulations emphasizing safety, comfort, and sustainability [14]. Group 3: Institutional Challenges - The pre-sale system in real estate has led to significant issues, including unclear responsibilities and inadequate maintenance of common areas, reflecting systemic risks in the market [16][17]. - The public area allocation disputes and the binding of property management to developers have resulted in low service quality and operational inefficiencies [16][17]. Group 4: Land System Reform - International experiences suggest that flexible land use policies can better balance housing supply and demand, contrasting with the rigid controls seen in the U.S. [18][20]. - China's collective land system reform is exploring new models to activate "sleeping assets," with local innovations facing challenges in rights clarification and market circulation [22][23]. Group 5: Conclusion and Outlook - The future of the Chinese real estate market will be characterized by "decreasing total volume and differentiated structure," necessitating a shift from developers to comprehensive operators [24]. - Companies that respect demographic trends and focus on long-term operations will thrive, as the market increasingly values quality over quantity in housing [26].