以下文章来源于锦缎 ，作者耀华 锦缎 . 上市公司研究平台，专注价值发现、创造与传播 将投中网设为"星标⭐"，第一时间收获最新推送 日本恰似一面棱镜，折射出提振内需的可靠范本。 作者丨 耀华 来源丨 锦锻 全球经济博弈的硝烟中，关税争端与贸易壁垒的喧嚣背后，一个更深刻的命题正浮出水面 —— 如何锻造经济的 " 内生韧性 " ？ 当外循环的不确定性如达摩克利斯之剑高悬，激活内需不仅是熨平风险的缓冲带，更是重构增长引擎的密钥。 从工业革命时期英国纺织业的国内消费扩张，到大萧条时代罗斯福新政的公共工程计划，历史的刻度反复印证着一个铁律——无论是繁荣周期的顺势而 上，还是低迷时刻的逆水行舟，提振内需始终是穿越经济迷雾的罗盘。 邻国日本，这个曾以 " 贸易立国 " 崛起、又在泡沫破裂后负重前行的东亚经济体，恰似一面棱镜，折射出提振内需的可靠范本：其经济产业结构、发 展周期与我国存在相似性，且同样历经贸易摩擦与外部压力冲击。 今天我们就以日本为参考，来总结和复盘下提升内需的思路、手段、政策都有哪些，哪些优势值得我们借鉴，又有哪些教训我们需要规避。 国民收入倍增计划 日本提振内需的计划不仅仅限于广场协议之后，上世纪 60 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of enhancing domestic demand as a key strategy for economic resilience amidst external uncertainties, drawing lessons from Japan's historical experiences in boosting domestic consumption [4]. Group 1: Japan's Domestic Demand Enhancement Plans - The "National Income Doubling Plan" initiated by Prime Minister Ikeda in 1960 aimed to increase production investment and enhance public capital through various means [7][8]. - Between 1961 and 1970, Japan's national income grew at an average annual rate of 11.5%, with per capita consumption expenditure growing at a compound annual growth rate of 9.4% [9][10]. - The plan faced challenges such as inflation, but it highlighted the importance of linking income distribution to domestic demand [10]. Group 2: Real Estate Boom and Its Consequences - The real estate boom in the 1970s initially stimulated domestic demand, with land prices peaking at a year-on-year increase of 30.9% in 1973 [12]. - However, the high real estate prices eventually reduced consumer willingness to spend, leading to a decline in domestic demand contribution from 9.9% to 3.3% [13]. Group 3: The Maekawa Report and Policy Shifts - The Maekawa Report, developed in the late 1970s, aimed to adjust the economic structure towards enhancing domestic demand after the Plaza Accord [15]. - It emphasized reducing working hours to increase consumer time demand, alongside urban redevelopment and housing policies [16]. Group 4: Abenomics and Its Impact - Abenomics, introduced in the early 2010s, focused on aggressive monetary easing, flexible fiscal policies, and structural reforms, with mixed results in boosting domestic demand [25][26]. - The negative interest rate policy and quantitative easing (QQE) aimed to stimulate lending and capital investment but did not effectively translate into increased consumer spending [28][29]. - Abenomics faced criticism for failing to address the underlying issues of low financial asset ownership among Japanese households, which limited the effectiveness of capital market stimulation [28][30]. Group 5: Lessons Learned and Future Directions - Japan's experience suggests that enhancing domestic demand requires a multifaceted approach, including public investment, capital market stimulation, and direct consumer support [32][33]. - The article concludes that successful domestic demand enhancement strategies must consider consumer confidence and income distribution reforms, as well as targeted subsidies [39][40].