以色列侨民事务部于周二表示，三十余家人道主义救援组织因未能遵守以色列新出台的注册规定，其在 加沙地带开展活动的授权将于明年 1 月 1 日被暂停，且这些组织必须在 3 月前完成撤离。 以色列官员称，新规的出台旨在防止武装分子混入救援组织。新规要求，人道主义救援组织需提交其巴 勒斯坦籍雇员名单等相关资料以供审查。官员们指出，涉事组织自今年 3 月起就获得了 "善意延期" 的 宽限，但仍未在年底的截止日期前提交上述材料。 加沙正处于人道主义危机之中，以色列此时决定对包括无国界医生组织在内的多家救援组织采取限制措 施，此举遭到了国际社会的反对。去年 10 月生效的脆弱停火协议目前仍在维持，但历经两年战乱后， 加沙地带约 200 万巴勒斯坦民众依旧深陷物资匮乏与饥荒的困境。 加拿大、丹麦、芬兰、法国、冰岛、日本、挪威、瑞典、瑞士及英国的外长于周二发表联合声明，他们 援引以色列政府 "限制性新规要求"，呼吁以色列确保救援组织能够 "以可持续、可预期的方式在加沙开 展行动"。 外长们在声明中写道："任何旨在限制救援组织行动能力的企图都是不可接受的。" 他们强调，若没有 救援组织的参与，"将无法按所需规模满足当地所有的紧急 ...

Core Viewpoint - Colombian President Petro responded to the U.S. revocation of his visa by calling for global attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and warned that "killing innocent babies will not make America great" [1] Group 1 - President Petro stated that he does not need a U.S. visa [1] - He expressed that the United Nations headquarters should not remain in New York [1]

Core Points - Colombian President Petro responded to the U.S. revocation of his visa, emphasizing that freedom of speech should not be criminalized and calling for global attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza [1] - The U.S. State Department announced the visa revocation due to Petro's "reckless and incendiary" behavior during a pro-Palestinian protest in New York [1] - Petro urged U.S. soldiers to disobey orders from Trump and follow commands of humanity, highlighting his stance against U.S. foreign policy [1]

Core Points - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu announced the next phase of military operations will focus on two locations still controlled by Hamas [1] - The Israeli military currently controls approximately 70% to 75% of Gaza, with Hamas's main strongholds being Gaza City and several refugee camps in central Gaza [1] - The Israeli Security Cabinet has instructed the military to eliminate these last Hamas strongholds, with plans to evacuate civilians to safety before the operations [1] Summary by Sections Military Operations - Netanyahu emphasized that the goal of the military operations is not to occupy Gaza but to "liberate" it from Hamas control [1] - The five principles of the military action include disarming Hamas, releasing all hostages, demilitarizing Gaza, ensuring Israeli security control over Gaza, and establishing a non-Hamas, non-Palestinian Authority alternative government [1] Humanitarian Crisis - Netanyahu denied that Israel is responsible for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, blaming Hamas for intercepting aid and creating shortages [2] - Israel plans to establish safe corridors, increase distribution points, and conduct air drops to facilitate humanitarian aid, coordinating with the U.S. to enhance assistance to Gaza [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the escalating humanitarian crisis in Gaza, exacerbated by the U.S. and Israel's shift in policy towards a more aggressive stance against Hamas, leading to increased civilian casualties and international condemnation [1][3][5]. Group 1: Humanitarian Crisis - Since late May, 1,373 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces while waiting for aid, with 859 deaths occurring near the distribution points of the U.S.-backed "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" [3][4]. - The United Nations has reported that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached its worst level, with widespread hunger and starvation among the population [3][6]. - International human rights organizations have condemned the U.S.-supported aid efforts as a "death trap" for civilians [3][4]. Group 2: U.S. and Israel Policy Shift - The U.S. has shifted from seeking a ceasefire to demanding the disarmament of Hamas and the demilitarization of Gaza, abandoning short-term ceasefire negotiations [4][5]. - Israeli officials have indicated that there will be no more partial ceasefire agreements, focusing instead on a comprehensive solution [4]. - The U.S. and Israel's "special relationship" is increasingly viewed as a cover for violations of international law, leading to a loss of international reputation for both countries [5][6]. Group 3: International Response - Several Western countries, including France, the UK, and Canada, are considering recognizing Palestine, reflecting growing discontent with U.S. support for Israel [5]. - Slovenia has become the first European country to ban arms trade with Israel, signaling a shift in diplomatic relations [5][6]. - Germany's Foreign Minister has urged Israel to provide urgent humanitarian aid, emphasizing the need for a two-state solution as the only path to peace [6].

Core Viewpoint - The fastest way to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is for Hamas to surrender and release hostages [1] Group 1 - The statement emphasizes the urgency of resolving the humanitarian situation in Gaza [1]

Core Viewpoint - The only way to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is through the unconditional lifting of the blockade and opening of crossing points [1] Group 1: Humanitarian Needs - Gaza requires at least 600 trucks of humanitarian supplies and fuel daily, but only a small fraction is allowed in [1] - Many trucks are reportedly being robbed during transport, which is seen as part of Israel's strategy to create chaos and hunger [1] Group 2: Responses from Israel - The Israeli Prime Minister's office claims that Hamas is stealing food from the people of Gaza [1] - Israel is providing supplies through air drops to ensure that aid reaches the people in Gaza [1] - On the same day, the Israeli military reported that planes from the UAE, Jordan, and Egypt dropped 32 aid packages into Gaza [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint highlights the dire situation faced by UN staff and doctors in Gaza, who are collapsing due to hunger and exhaustion [1] Group 2 - The UN Refugee Agency's Director-General emphasizes the critical conditions under which humanitarian workers are operating in Gaza [1] - There is an urgent need for increased support and resources to ensure the safety and well-being of those providing aid [1] - The ongoing conflict has severely impacted the ability of healthcare professionals to perform their duties effectively [1]

Core Viewpoint - The "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation," supported by the U.S. and Israel, has been criticized for failing to provide effective humanitarian aid and instead creating more tragedies, with at least 875 deaths reported near its distribution points [1][2][3] Group 1: Criticism of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation - The United Nations and many international aid organizations have refused to cooperate with the "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation," viewing it as serving Israeli military objectives and violating humanitarian principles [2][3] - The foundation has significantly reduced the number of aid distribution points from 400 to a maximum of 4, forcing people to travel long distances under dangerous conditions to receive aid [2][3] - Reports indicate that the distribution points are located in areas heavily controlled by Israeli forces, leading to incidents where Israeli soldiers have shot individuals collecting food [3][4] Group 2: Political Implications - The U.S. and Israel's support for the foundation aims to politicize and weaponize humanitarian aid, further tightening control over the Gaza situation [4][5] - Plans have been revealed to establish a "humanitarian city" in southern Gaza, which would require security checks for entry and effectively restrict movement for those who enter [6][7] - The foundation's operations are seen as a means to facilitate the forced migration of Palestinians, altering the demographic and territorial status of Gaza [6][7] Group 3: International Response - Over 165 international humanitarian organizations have condemned the foundation's actions, calling for its immediate cessation [3] - The international community, including the UN, has emphasized the need to restore humanitarian aid channels and oppose any unilateral changes to the status of Gaza [9][10] - Criticism from various global leaders highlights the foundation's actions as violations of international law and humanitarian principles [7][9]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S.-led aid distribution mechanism in Gaza is criticized for exacerbating the humanitarian crisis, with claims that it is causing more harm than good [1][4]. Aid Distribution Mechanism - Since May 27, the U.S. and Israel-backed "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" has taken control of aid distribution, bypassing UN agencies to prevent aid from reaching Hamas [1][3]. - The distribution points are limited and primarily located in southern Gaza, forcing many civilians to travel long distances to access aid [1][2]. Humanitarian Crisis Severity - The humanitarian situation in Gaza is dire, with over 5.6 million deaths reported since the outbreak of the latest conflict in October 2023 [5]. - One-fifth of Gaza's population of over 2 million is facing hunger, and more than 684,000 people have been displaced since military actions resumed in March [5][6]. International Response - The UN and international aid organizations have consistently opposed the aid distribution mechanism, stating it does not meet humanitarian principles [3][4]. - The UN Secretary-General and other officials have labeled the mechanism as a "death trap," indicating that more people are dying than being helped [4].