Workflow
反竞争行为
icon
Search documents
巴西反垄断机构建议裁定苹果iOS生态系统存在反竞争行为
news flash· 2025-07-01 02:22
巴西反垄断监管机构经济保护和管理委员会(CADE)6月30日发布声明,建议对苹果公司做出裁决,指控 后者iOS生态系统中存在反竞争行为。此前,拉美地区电商平台MercadoLibre等公司于2022年提出投 诉,称苹果涉嫌限制数字商品分销和应用内购买。CADE表示,调查发现苹果公司存在滥用行为,建议 采取罚款和行为补救措施解决已发现的反竞争问题。(智通财经) ...
报道:OpenAI 高管已讨论指控微软存在反竞争行为
news flash· 2025-06-16 20:43
据知情人士透露,OpenAI 的高管已讨论指控其主要支持者微软在合作期间存在反竞争行为。OpenAI的 行动可能包括寻求联邦监管机构审查其与微软的合同条款,以查明是否存在违反反垄断法的行为,并开 展公众宣传活动。(华尔街日报) ...
据华尔街日报:OpenAI的高管在合作期间曾讨论指控微软(MSFT.O)存在反竞争行为。
news flash· 2025-06-16 20:07
据华尔街日报:OpenAI的高管在合作期间曾讨论指控微软(MSFT.O)存在反竞争行为。 ...
苹果(AAPL.US)败诉 美国上诉法院拒绝暂停App Store整改命令
智通财经网· 2025-06-05 00:54
苹果寻求暂停这一命令,同时对法官4月份的裁决提出上诉,该裁决要求苹果必须遵守法官在发现该公 司从事违反加州法律的反竞争行为后发布的2021年禁令。 智通财经APP获悉,美国上诉法院驳回苹果(AAPL.US)暂停执行App Store整改命令的请求。该命令要求 苹果允许App Store开发者引导用户到网络上购买应用内商品,而无需支付佣金。 旧金山联邦上诉法院周三作出这项裁决,这是苹果与《堡垒之夜》开发商Epic Games就其App Store主导 智能手机软件市场的长期争端中遭遇的最新挫折。 苹果向上诉法院辩称,美国加州奥克兰地区法官Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers的裁决给该公司造成了"严重 的、不可挽回的损害"。这家iPhone制造商还辩称,Gonzalez Rogers错误地认定该公司没有遵守其 2021 年的禁令。 包括 Epic、亚马逊和Spotify在内的多家开发商已经修改了他们的应用程序,以允许客户绕过苹果的支 付方式。 为了响应2021年的禁令,苹果允许开发者引导用户到网络上完成应用内购买交易,但要求开发者向苹果 支付27%的营收分成。 Epic指责苹果公司藐视2021年的禁令,最 ...
Amazon price rules anti-competitive: German regulator
TechXplore· 2025-06-02 16:02
Core Viewpoint - Amazon's pricing rules are deemed an abuse of market power by Germany's competition watchdog, potentially leading to demands for changes in its business practices in Germany, which is Europe's largest economy [3][4]. Group 1: Market Position - Amazon accounts for approximately 60% of online retail revenue in Germany, highlighting its dominant position in the market [3][5]. - The Federal Cartel Office has raised concerns about Amazon's influence on pricing, particularly as it competes directly with other marketplace retailers on its platform [4][6]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The German regulator has initiated an investigation into Amazon's pricing rules, which began in November 2022, focusing on the implications of price caps imposed on third-party sellers [6]. - Amazon has the opportunity to respond to the regulator's preliminary ruling, indicating ongoing discussions regarding its business practices [5]. Group 3: Company Response - Amazon disputes the findings of the cartel office, asserting that its pricing rules benefit customers by ensuring competitive pricing, availability, and delivery speed [5][6]. - The company faces additional allegations of anti-competitive behavior from US regulators, further complicating its regulatory landscape [6].