北京时间10月3日上午，OpenAI通过官方新闻账号对马斯克最新以诉讼为幌子的骚扰策略作出回应。 OpenAI表示，不需要也不想要任何人的商业机密。OpenAI将保护员工，不会被马斯克试图欺凌他们的 行为所吓倒。 OpenAI还在官网发布了对马斯克商业机密诉讼的辩护书和驳回动议。在辩护书中，OpenAI表示，此案 旨在制造舆论，以恐吓和威胁那些行使权利离开并到AI行业其他地方工作的员工，并试图阻止更多人 离开xAI。OpenAI强烈反对这种策略，并将自始至终地支持其员工。 图片来源： OpenAI官方网站 图片来源：OpenAI官方新闻账号@OpenAI Newsroom 此前，马斯克旗下AI公司xAI曾对OpenAI发起多个诉讼，包括指控OpenAI诱导前xAI员工窃取并分享 xAI的商业机密，违反了相关法律。 OpenAI与马斯克的"恩怨"由来已久，OpenAI也曾多次对马斯克的诉讼实施反击。 8月，据新华社报道，马斯克旗下的xAI和社交媒体平台X8月25日起诉苹果公司和开放人工智能研究中 心（OpenAI），指控这两家公司联手实施"反竞争"计划，维持在智能手机和生成式人工智能市场的垄 断地位。 诉讼书指 ...

美国企业家马斯克旗下的人工智能初创公司xAI和社交媒体平台X于25日起诉苹果公司和开放人工智能 研究中心（OpenAI），指控这两家公司联手实施"反竞争"计划，维持在智能手机和生成式人工智能市 场的垄断地位。 诉讼书指出，苹果与OpenAI的"排他性协议"使ChatGPT成为iPhone唯一内置的生成式人工智能聊天机器 人，相关竞争对手难以扩大规模和进行创新。"原告提起本诉讼，旨在制止被告的反竞争行为， 并追讨 数十亿美元的经济损失。" OpenAI一位发言人在声明中回应，这一最新诉讼"与马斯克先生持续的骚扰行为模式一致"。 来源：新华社 责编：陈丽湘 诉讼书还称，苹果在其应用商店中降低竞争产品的优先级，拖延相关审核流程，给予OpenAI特殊待 遇。 马斯克本月早些时候在社交媒体X平台上称，苹果的行为让除OpenAI之外的任何人工智能公司都无法在 苹果应用商店排名第一。苹果公司发言人曾对此表示，其应用商店设计"公平且无偏见"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk's xAI and social media platform X have filed a lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI, accusing them of engaging in anti-competitive practices to maintain monopoly positions in the smartphone and generative AI markets [1] Group 1: Allegations and Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that an "exclusive agreement" between Apple and OpenAI has made ChatGPT the only built-in generative AI chatbot on iPhones, hindering competitors' ability to scale and innovate [1] - The plaintiffs aim to stop the defendants' anti-competitive behavior and seek damages amounting to billions of dollars [1] - The lawsuit also alleges that Apple has lowered the priority of competing products in its app store and delayed review processes, providing OpenAI with special treatment [1] Group 2: Responses and Reactions - Elon Musk stated earlier that Apple's actions prevent any AI company other than OpenAI from achieving top rankings in the Apple App Store [1] - An Apple spokesperson claimed that the app store is designed to be "fair and unbiased" [1] - A representative from OpenAI responded that the lawsuit aligns with Musk's ongoing pattern of harassment [1]

Group 1: Legal Actions and Market Dynamics - Elon Musk's companies xAI and X have filed a lawsuit against Apple and OpenAI, accusing them of anti-competitive behavior aimed at suppressing competition in the AI sector [1] - The lawsuit claims that Apple and OpenAI conspired to maintain their monopoly in the smartphone and generative AI markets [1] Group 2: Funding and Financial Developments - AI toy company Haivivi has completed a Series A financing round of 200 million yuan, led by multiple investors including CICC Capital and Sequoia China, with funds allocated for product development, talent acquisition, and market expansion [2] - Intel has expressed concerns regarding Trump's stockholding plan, which poses business risks, as the company announced layoffs and the cancellation of overseas projects [2] - Intel is facing a potential conversion of $10.9 billion in federal subsidies into equity to support the semiconductor industry [2] Group 3: Product Launches and Industry Growth - NVIDIA has launched its Jetson AGX Thor robot chip module, priced at $3,499, aimed at enabling customers to create robot prototypes [2] - The humanoid robot industry in China is projected to exceed 10,000 units sold this year, reflecting a 125% year-on-year growth, indicating a significant market potential [3] - The overall installation rate of Advanced Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in passenger vehicles reached 64.4% in the first half of 2025, with a notable increase in the installation rate for new energy vehicles [5]

Core Viewpoint - Google has agreed to pay a fine of AUD 55 million (approximately USD 35.8 million) in Australia due to anti-competitive practices related to its search application on Android devices [1][2] Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Issues - The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) found that Google paid two major telecom companies to pre-install its search application, thereby harming competition [1] - A recent court ruling indicated that both Google and Apple have abused their market dominance in app stores, confirming anti-competitive behavior [1] - Google has acknowledged that its agreements with Telstra and Optus significantly impacted competition in the search engine market and has ceased entering into similar agreements [1] Group 2: Company Response and Future Actions - Google expressed satisfaction in resolving ACCC's concerns, which pertained to provisions in business agreements that are no longer applicable [2] - The company is committed to providing more flexibility for Android device manufacturers to pre-install browsers and search applications, while maintaining features that foster innovation and competition with Apple [2]

Core Viewpoint - Opera has filed a complaint with Brazil's antitrust agency CADE, accusing Microsoft of anti-competitive practices in promoting its Edge browser, which has negatively impacted Opera's market position as the third most popular PC browser in Brazil [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against Microsoft - Opera claims that Microsoft has employed various "manipulative design strategies" to persuade Windows users to adopt Edge, effectively blocking competition by pre-installing Edge and creating barriers for users to download other browsers [3][8]. - Specific tactics include forcing Edge to open links from Microsoft applications like Outlook and Teams, regardless of user settings for default browsers, and promoting Edge prominently in Bing search results while downplaying Chrome's download link [8][10]. Group 2: Impact on Opera - The competitive landscape has shifted since Microsoft transitioned Edge to the Chromium engine, diminishing Opera's performance advantage, which previously allowed it to attract a loyal user base due to its speed and unique features [6][12]. - Microsoft's strategies have limited Opera's visibility and accessibility, making it increasingly difficult for the browser to reach potential users, thereby exacerbating its challenges in a market dominated by larger players like Chrome and Edge [12][14].

Core Viewpoint - Brazil's antitrust regulator, CADE, has suggested a ruling against Apple, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior within its iOS ecosystem [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - CADE's statement was released on June 30, indicating that it found evidence of abuse by Apple [1] - The investigation was prompted by complaints from companies like MercadoLibre in 2022, alleging that Apple restricted the distribution of digital goods and in-app purchases [1] - CADE recommends imposing fines and behavioral remedies to address the identified anti-competitive issues [1]

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI executives are discussing allegations of anti-competitive behavior by its primary supporter, Microsoft, during their collaboration [1] Group 1: Allegations and Actions - OpenAI may seek federal regulatory review of its contract terms with Microsoft to determine potential violations of antitrust laws [1] - The company is considering launching public advocacy efforts related to these allegations [1]

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI executives discussed allegations of anti-competitive behavior by Microsoft during their collaboration [1] Group 1 - The discussions regarding Microsoft's alleged anti-competitive practices occurred while OpenAI was working with the company [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Court of Appeals has denied Apple's request to pause the enforcement of a ruling that requires the company to allow App Store developers to direct users to purchase in-app goods online without paying a commission [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The San Francisco Federal Appeals Court's decision is a setback for Apple in its long-standing dispute with Epic Games regarding the App Store's dominance in the smartphone software market [1]. - Apple is appealing the April ruling that found the company engaged in anti-competitive behavior, which led to a 2021 injunction against the company [1][3]. - The Appeals Court stated that after reviewing relevant factors, it deemed that a stay of enforcement was not appropriate [1]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The April ruling has weakened Apple's substantial revenue from the App Store by prohibiting the company from charging commissions on transactions outside the App Store [1]. - Apple is now allowing developers to direct users to complete in-app purchases online but requires them to pay a 27% revenue share to Apple [2]. Group 3: Developer Response - Several developers, including Epic, Amazon, and Spotify, have modified their applications to allow customers to bypass Apple's payment system [2]. - Epic Games has accused Apple of contempt for violating the 2021 injunction, which has led to further legal scrutiny [3].