垄断

Search documents
马斯克起诉苹果与OpenAI
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-27 02:38
据报道,马斯克公司的律师表示,苹果和OpenAI的"独家安排使ChatGPT(OpenAI旗下AI产品)成为唯一集成到iPhone中的生成式AI聊天机器人",并"锁 定了市场以维持其垄断地位,阻止像X和xAI这样的创新者参与竞争"。这些指控是在xAI的人工智能聊天机器人Grok发布最新版本后出现的。 报道称,马斯克在X上宣称苹果具有"确凿的垄断违法行为",并补充说苹果"采取的行为使得除OpenAI之外的任何AI公司都不可能登上App Store榜首"。但 苹果公司发言人曾对此表示,其应用商店设计"公平且无偏见"。 马斯克 资料图 据环球网援引外媒27日报道,马斯克旗下人工智能公司xAI和社交媒体平台X当地时间周一在得克萨斯州沃斯堡联邦法院起诉苹果公司和开放人工智能研 究中心(OpenAI),指控这两家公司联手实施"反竞争"计划,维持在智能手机和生成式人工智能市场的垄断地位。马斯克与OpenAI创始人奥尔特曼之间 的持续冲突再一次"闹上法庭"。 马斯克和奥尔特曼 资料图 xAI在诉讼中要求数十亿美元的赔偿金,同时寻求法院禁令,阻止苹果和OpenAI继续其所谓的"非法安排"。 成立不到两年的xAI正与微软支持的O ...
刚刚,马斯克将OpenAI和苹果告上法庭:指控ChatGPT垄断iPhone,自家Grok被打压
机器之心· 2025-08-25 23:38
机器之心报道 机器之心编辑部 通过双方达成的协议,iPhone 用户「没有理由」下载第三方 AI 应用。苹果在启用 Apple Intelligence 时「强迫」他们使用 ChatGPT 作为默认聊天机器人应用。 当地时间周一,马斯克向 OpenAI 和苹果「开炮」了! 据多家外媒报道,马斯克旗下 xAI 一纸讼书,控告它们通过 ChatGPT 和苹果 App Store 进行非法垄断。 在一则推文中,马斯克表示,自家 Grok 有 100 万条评论,评论分高达 4.9,但苹果仍然拒绝在任何排名中将 Grok 列入其中。 xAI 指控 OpenAI 和苹果通过达成协议,将 ChatGPT 内置到 iPhone 中,从而扼杀 AI 行业的竞争。此外,苹果的 App Store 被指控「降低」了竞品聊天机器人和 「超级应用」的优先级,包括 Grok 和 X。 我们搜索发现,在苹果 App Store 最新的免费 App 应用榜单中,「ChatGPT 排在首位,而 xAI 和 X 分别排在了 31 和 36 位。」 正如 xAI 在诉讼书中所言,「苹果和 OpenAI 已经锁定了市场,并得以维持垄断地位,阻止像 ...
专访黄勇:行业“反内卷”需规避垄断风险
经济观察报· 2025-08-24 08:48
黄勇说,不能将"反内卷"简单等同于"反竞争",更不能单纯 通过涨价、去产能的方式"反内卷"。"内卷"有复杂的成因, 需要系统性的措施应对。 作者: 宋笛 封图:图虫创意 近年来,"内卷式"竞争在多个行业持续蔓延,具体表现为价格机制失灵、低创新同质化竞争与劣币驱逐良 币、市场无序扩张等现象,反映出市场有效需求不足、资源配置效率下降与产业结构失衡的系统性问题。 2024年12月召开的中央经济工作会议提出,要"综合整治内卷式竞争,规范地方政府和企业行为",为相 关工作开展提供了政府、商事主体二分的系统治理观。随后,各部委迅速响应,多个行业陆续通过"自上而 下"或"自下而上"的方式着力解决行业内的"内卷式"竞争问题。 其中,各类行业协会和头部企业的行动值得关注。部分行业在协会和头部企业的牵头下,通过座谈、协商 的方式在"价格自律""产能自律"等方面达成协议。 这种行为固然可能在短期调整行业内的产能结构,缓解价格竞争,但往往治标不治本,反而引发了关于反 垄断方面的忧虑。 对外经济贸易大学竞争法中心主任黄勇教授是反垄断领域的知名专家,研究竞争法、经济法已有40多年。 他近期时常收到部分行业协会拟定的"协调成果",其中一些 ...
让·梯若尔:政府应营造有利竞争的环境,而非为了监管而监管
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-02 11:16
Core Viewpoint - The speech by Jean Tirole emphasizes the critical role of markets in driving economic growth and technological advancement, particularly in China since the 1980s [1][3]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - Competition is essential for markets; monopolies raise prices and stifle innovation due to a lack of self-disruption motivation and competitive pressure [3]. - Large enterprises often become conservative due to scale effects, relying on patent barriers and lobbying to maintain market positions [3]. Group 2: Government and Market Relationship - The relationship between market and government is complementary; both are necessary, but government can also "fail" like markets [3][4]. - Government intervention is crucial to prevent illegal monopolies and ensure fair income distribution through antitrust laws, consumer protection, and innovation policies [3][4]. Group 3: Digital Economy and Innovation - The government should create a competitive environment and implement sound competition policies rather than unnecessary regulations [4]. - Encouraging data portability and interoperability can lower switching costs and provide users with more choices, fostering innovation [4]. Group 4: Ecosystem and Collaboration - A neutral competitive ecosystem should be established where all companies can participate fairly, including universities that promote critical thinking [4]. - Innovation thrives in an environment that balances competition and cooperation, supported by infrastructure and data-sharing mechanisms [4]. Group 5: Global Challenges and Multilateralism - Current global challenges such as geopolitical divisions and trade wars hinder cross-border cooperation and knowledge flow [5]. - A commitment to multilateralism and rule-based cooperation is essential for long-term social goals and economic prosperity [5].
TikTok否认收购Tokopedia涉垄断:平台不限制用户的销售和推广行为
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-12 11:04
Core Viewpoint - TikTokNusantara (SG) Pte. Ltd. denies allegations of monopolistic behavior following its acquisition of 75.01% of PT Tokopedia, despite concerns raised by the Indonesian Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) regarding potential market dominance [2][4]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - On January 31, 2024, TikTokNusantara successfully acquired 75.01% of PT Tokopedia, a leading player in Indonesia's e-commerce sector with a large user base and significant market share [2]. - The integration of TikTok and Tokopedia has raised concerns about changes in the competitive landscape of the e-commerce market [2]. Group 2: KPPU Investigation Findings - KPPU's investigation found no significant barriers to market entry or increased entry thresholds for new businesses, but noted significant network effects and potential risks related to bundling and tie-in sales [2][3]. - These factors could negatively impact consumers and other businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, leading to questions about monopolistic practices [2]. Group 3: TikTok's Response - TikTok's legal advisor stated that sales on Tokopedia and ShopTokopedia comply with existing regulations, emphasizing that the platforms collaborate with multiple logistics and payment service providers, ensuring open competition [3]. - TikTok does not engage in bundling or tie-in sales and respects users' freedom to promote products from other e-commerce platforms [3]. - TikTok has committed to cooperating with KPPU's proposals for conditional approvals, including maintaining an open payment and logistics system and submitting regular reports [3]. Group 4: Market Implications - TikTok's response to the monopolistic allegations reflects its respect for market rules and aims to instill confidence in the healthy development of Indonesia's e-commerce market [4]. - The future of TikTok and Tokopedia's collaboration will be closely monitored as regulatory scrutiny and market dynamics evolve [4].
博通,又涉嫌垄断?
半导体行业观察· 2025-05-31 02:21
Core Viewpoint - The current licensing model of VMware is reportedly in violation of European competition regulations, raising concerns about Broadcom's business practices and their impact on cloud service providers in Europe [4][5]. Group 1: Licensing Issues - Broadcom has transitioned many VMware customers to a new licensing framework, which has resulted in significant financial burdens and operational disadvantages for clients [4][5]. - The European Cloud Computing Competition Observatory (ECCO) indicates that VMware's licensing practices may harm both customers and the broader European cloud ecosystem, suggesting that shareholders should question the legality of this model [5]. Group 2: Partner Program Changes - VMware has raised prices after eliminating perpetual licenses and monthly pay-as-you-go pricing, which has been a major concern for its cloud partners and customers [5]. - The ECCO report highlights that Broadcom's recent modifications to its partner program force cloud service providers to choose between acting as service providers or resellers, further diminishing their competitive capabilities [5]. Group 3: Recommendations for Change - CISPE and ECCO have called for Broadcom to implement significant changes to restore fair licensing for cloud service providers, including a six-month notice period for any changes in contract terms or pricing structures [6]. - Smaller cloud service providers should have easier access to higher partnership levels, and there should be more transparent pricing models that reflect actual usage [6].
突破垄断——广州体制的走私“虫洞”
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-05-26 07:47
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transition from a mercantilist trade system dominated by the British East India Company to a more decentralized and spontaneous free trade era characterized by "scatter merchants" in the context of global history [2][3][4]. Group 1: Historical Context - The British government utilized the East India Company to engage in the opium trade, instigating the Opium Wars to control trade with China, leading to the company's eventual dissolution and the end of the Silver Age [2][3]. - The Silver Age was marked by the British Industrial Revolution and free trade, culminating in significant historical events such as the bankruptcy of the East India Company and the destruction of the Old Summer Palace during the Second Opium War [2][3]. Group 2: The Role of "Scatter Merchants" - The book "Mr. Smith Goes to China" by Han Jiexie focuses on the activities of three Scottish merchants named George Smith, whose trade activities in India and China illustrate the rise of the British global empire [2][3]. - These merchants operated during the Qianlong period, and their trade demands prompted the Macartney Mission to China, contributing to the development of a global trade network [3][4]. Group 3: Trade Dynamics - The trade triangle formed between Britain, India, and China involved the exchange of goods such as tea, silver, cotton, and opium, shaping the economic geography of modern Asia [5][6]. - The East India Company collaborated with the Cohong (Thirteen Hongs) to create a trade and financial system known as the "Guangzhou System," which was later disrupted by the activities of the "Smiths" [5][6]. Group 4: Financial Operations - The "Smiths" provided high-risk loans to Chinese merchants at interest rates of 18%-22%, which, while lower than the legal rate of 36%, led to widespread defaults and contributed to the 1779 Guangzhou financial crisis [7][8]. - They utilized the East India Company's financial system to facilitate the flow of silver from India to Guangzhou, supporting the company's tea purchases, with significant amounts of silver injected into the system [6][7]. Group 5: Impact on Trade Policies - The actions of the "Smiths" challenged the monopoly of the East India Company, leading to a shift in British colonial policy towards more liberal trade practices, culminating in the repeal of the company's trading privileges in 1813 [9][10]. - The article highlights the inherent contradictions in the relationship between the "Smiths" and the East India Company, characterized by both dependency and a desire to undermine the company's monopoly [6][9]. Group 6: The Role of Scottish Merchants - Scottish merchants were significantly more active in trade compared to their English counterparts, driven by a historical context of conquest and subjugation, which fostered a spirit of independence and opposition to monopolistic practices [10][11]. - The "Smiths" embodied the ideals of Adam Smith's free trade philosophy, acting as practitioners of these ideas in the context of the global economy [9][10].
广州一二手市场,正在抛弃“贝壳”
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-25 22:11
广州一二手市场"去贝壳化" 最近,广州多个新盘"去贝壳化"后,意外火爆。 "垄断"这一招,贝壳找房app怎么就在广州不合时宜? 只能说,这个城市容不得一点"套路"。 在"去贝壳化"上,越秀地产打响了第一枪。 越秀云悦去年底开盘,在白云首战告捷,靠着自媒体和全民营销助力,直接创下5个月清盘神话。 呐,有图有真相,全盘3栋楼,没有网签的已经寥寥无几了。 | 应号 | 项目名称 | 开发商 | 预售证 | 项目地址 | 任宅已售 套数 | 住宅未售 套數 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 云悦图(自编号3#) | 广州越秀华城房地产开发 | 20240423 | 君云区京嘉街金殿社区怡 | 102 | 3 | | | | 有限公司 | | 新路258号 | | | | S | 云悦园(宫鼎号2#) | 成十九起受华城房地产开发 | 20250013 | 年区 标题在线观点区 日 | 89 | 16 | | | | 有限公司 | | 新路260号 | | | | 3 | 云悦园(自编号1#) | 广州越秀华城房地产开发 | 20240464 | 白 ...
美国人最痛恨的四家企业,为何他们会如此招黑?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-23 11:22
Core Insights - The article discusses four companies that consistently rank high on the "public dislike list" due to various controversies surrounding their business practices and ethical standards [1] Group 1: Meta (formerly Facebook) - Meta is criticized for its handling of user privacy, particularly following the Cambridge Analytica scandal where over 87 million user data was misused, resulting in a $5 billion settlement, the largest corporate fine in U.S. history [3] - A 2022 Pew Research Center survey indicated that 72% of U.S. social media users believe Meta lacks transparency in data collection [3] Group 2: Comcast - Comcast has been named the "worst customer service company" for seven consecutive years, facing complaints about hidden fees and frequent service interruptions [5] - In 2021, the Federal Communications Commission received over 120,000 complaints regarding Comcast's bundled sales and billing disputes [5] - Despite a 40% profit margin in its broadband business reported in 2022, customer satisfaction remains 15 percentage points below the industry average [5] Group 3: Ticketmaster - Ticketmaster controls over 80% of the U.S. market for large event ticketing, following its acquisition of Live Nation [8] - The company charges service fees that can reach up to 75% of the ticket price, generating over $2 billion in service fee revenue in 2021 [8] - Dynamic pricing practices have led to significant price increases shortly after ticket sales begin, prompting investigations from 34 state attorneys general [8] Group 4: Boeing - Boeing's reputation suffered after two fatal 737 MAX crashes in 2018-2019, which resulted in 346 deaths and revealed serious design flaws that were concealed to expedite delivery [10] - Internal documents indicated that engineers had warned about the system risks as early as 2016 [10] - The company reported a net loss of $5 billion in 2022, as its market share was overtaken by Airbus due to a loss of public trust [10] Group 5: Broader Implications - The controversies surrounding these companies highlight the tension between profit motives and public interest, with issues such as data ownership, lack of competition, regulatory lag, and ethical failures being central themes [12] - Public backlash is driving change, as consumers shift towards alternatives that prioritize transparency and ethical practices [12]
打破医药垄断!破局者,来了
城市财经· 2025-03-05 03:39
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the disruption of established pharmaceutical monopolies, particularly focusing on the case of Viagra and the emergence of cost-effective alternatives in the Chinese market, highlighting the impact of competitive pricing and innovative business models on traditional market leaders [1][10]. Section Summaries Introduction - The launch of deepseek, a large model trained with 2048 NVIDIA H800 chips, parallels historical market disruptions, leading to significant declines in stock prices for major players like NVIDIA, suggesting a pattern of vulnerability in perceived monopolies [1]. Origin of Viagra - Viagra, developed from an unexpected discovery in the 1990s, became a commercial success with over $32 billion in sales from 1998 to 2017, establishing a strong market presence during its patent period [2][3]. Challenges to Viagra - Despite the introduction of Cialis in 2002, Viagra maintained its dominance due to similar pricing strategies among leading pharmaceutical companies, which avoided triggering price wars [5][6]. Emergence of Chinese Competitors - Following the expiration of Viagra's patent in China in 2014, local companies introduced generics at 20%-30% lower prices, leading to a significant market shift with products like "惯爱" priced at 3-6 RMB, drastically reducing patient costs [6][7]. Business Strategy of "惯爱" - The success of "惯爱" is attributed to a disruptive pricing strategy that expands market share and reduces costs through economies of scale, creating a positive feedback loop of growth and innovation [7][8]. Production and Supply Chain Advantages - China's position as the largest producer of active pharmaceutical ingredients has lowered production costs, enabling competitive pricing for domestic drugs [8][9]. Technological Advancements in Production - The automation and digitization of production processes in China have enhanced efficiency, allowing companies like "惯爱" to maintain high-quality standards while keeping prices low [9]. Reconstructing Market Dynamics - The integration of online healthcare services with pharmaceutical distribution has transformed the erectile dysfunction drug market, shifting the focus from price competition to a comprehensive service model [10].