Group 1 - The article discusses the importance of etiquette in historical dramas, emphasizing that it significantly impacts the audience's perception and immersion in the story [3][10][65] - The author argues that many contemporary historical dramas lack a genuine representation of ancient customs and behaviors, leading to a loss of authenticity [9][62][98] - The piece highlights that proper etiquette reflects a character's social status and identity, which is crucial for audience engagement [14][15][66] Group 2 - The article provides examples of how historical figures were portrayed in earlier dramas, showcasing their unique walking styles and gestures that conveyed their status [18][22][24] - It contrasts past productions with modern ones, noting that many current dramas fail to capture the subtleties of character behavior, resulting in a less believable portrayal of historical figures [36][62][97] - The author emphasizes that attention to detail in character portrayal, including body language and small gestures, is essential for creating a believable historical narrative [50][55][90] Group 3 - The article concludes that the decline in the quality of historical dramas is due to a lack of commitment from both actors and directors to authentically represent the characters and their contexts [89][100][102] - It suggests that a return to rigorous training and a focus on character depth could enhance the quality of future productions [92][94][96] - The author expresses disappointment in the current state of historical dramas, indicating that the industry has shifted towards a "fast-food" model rather than producing quality content [98][101]