lle 《开手直销 四 《波茨坦公告 O 7 《正告高市：军 VVAIII 今年是中国人民抗日战争胜利80周年，是台湾光复80周年。台湾回归中国是二战胜利成果和战后国际秩序的重要组成部分。《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》 《日本投降书》等一系列具有国际法效力的文件都确认了中国对台湾的主权。然而日本首相高市早苗无视包括《开罗宣言》在内的国际法文件，甚至妄图煽 炒所谓"台湾地位未定论"，至今拒绝收回涉台错误言论，这是错上加错。错上加错的背后，折射出高市内心深处错误的历史观和根深蒂固的军国主义执念。 包括中国在内的亚洲乃至世界人民永远不会忘记日本法西斯制造的惨重灾难，绝不允许日本军国主义幽灵再次为祸人间。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Japanese government's stance on Taiwan is seen as ambiguous and evasive, failing to acknowledge historical agreements that affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Position on Taiwan - Japan's Prime Minister and Foreign Minister have reiterated the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" while avoiding discussions on key documents that affirm Taiwan's return to China [1]. - The spokesperson criticized Japan for not addressing the Cairo Declaration and other international legal documents that establish China's sovereignty over Taiwan [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and International Obligations - The Cairo Declaration, along with other international legal documents, is highlighted as a significant outcome of the anti-fascist war and a crucial part of the post-war international order [1]. - Japan's failure to comply with these documents is framed as a violation of international law obligations and a prerequisite for Japan's acceptance in the international community post-war [1]. Group 3: Japan's Security Policy Changes - Japan has been adjusting its security policies, increasing defense budgets, and attempting to modify its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," which raises concerns about a resurgence of militarism [2]. - The spokesperson emphasized that certain factions in Japan are trying to evade historical accountability for wartime actions and are attempting to rewrite history to absolve themselves of past aggressions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have faced significant criticism both domestically and internationally, with assertions that they undermine international law and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [1][3]. Group 1: Legal and Historical Context - The "San Francisco Peace Treaty" is deemed illegal and invalid as it disregards China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which was affirmed by prior agreements such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [3]. - The signing of the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" violated the principles established in the United Nations Declaration, indicating that it should not have addressed China's territorial issues without China's involvement [3]. Group 2: Political Implications - Takaichi's comments challenge the political foundation established by four key political documents between China and Japan, suggesting a departure from previously agreed-upon principles [3]. - The remarks are viewed as a threat to the post-war international order and the political basis of Sino-Japanese relations, with calls for adherence to international law and mutual respect [3][6]. Group 3: Reactions from Experts - Various experts, including legal scholars and political figures, have condemned Takaichi's statements as dangerous and a violation of international law, emphasizing the need for Japan to recognize Taiwan as an inseparable part of China [5][6][10]. - The comments have been characterized as not only a misinterpretation of historical facts but also a potential threat to peace and stability in international relations [6][9].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that Japan's historical claims regarding Taiwan are incorrect and based on a misunderstanding or distortion of history [2] - The spokesperson from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning, asserts that Japan's unconditional surrender in 1945 included a commitment to return Taiwan to China, thus affirming China's sovereignty over Taiwan [2] - Mao Ning highlights that the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 did not change China's international legal status, and the PRC fully exercises sovereignty over Taiwan [2] Group 2 - The article mentions that the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement recognized the PRC as the only legitimate government of China, reinforcing the notion of a single China [2] - Mao Ning stresses that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China's territory, a fact that should not be distorted or altered [2]