Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy involving a village official selling millet online and being accused by Xiaomi of "associating with Lei's marketing" has sparked significant public interest. Xiaomi clarified that their complaint was not against the use of the term "millet" or the sale of millet products, but rather against the malicious imitation and defamation of their executives [1][10]. Group 1: Xiaomi's Response - Xiaomi's spokesperson emphasized that the claims made in the viral video were completely false and a distortion of facts, clarifying that the complaint was aimed at protecting the company's reputation and not at restricting the use of the term "millet" [1][2]. - The company has a history of supporting agricultural initiatives and rural revitalization, having donated to schools and farms in various provinces including Guizhou, Yunnan, Hunan, Hebei, and Xinjiang [1][2]. Group 2: Legal and Social Implications - The company called for a collective effort against false online information and actions that provoke public sentiment, aiming to create a healthier online discourse [2][3]. - The involved village official, known as "Xiao Feng," later issued an apology, acknowledging that his video had caused an impact on Xiaomi and wasted social resources, and committed to regulating his online behavior in the future [6][10]. Group 3: Details of the Complaint - The complaint against the village official included allegations of using exaggerated expressions and imitating Xiaomi's executives in a misleading manner, which could confuse the public and damage the company's image [4][19]. - Legal experts indicated that if the video used Lei Jun's name or likeness, it could potentially infringe on his rights, including name and reputation [19].

Core Viewpoint - The dispute between two major lithium battery material companies, Yongtai Technology and Tianci Materials, has escalated, with both parties filing lawsuits against each other over alleged defamation and infringement of commercial secrets [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions - Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary, Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials, have filed civil lawsuits against Tianci Materials for defamation, seeking compensation of 57.5193 million yuan and 1 yuan respectively [1]. - Tianci Materials has also initiated legal proceedings against Yongtai Technology and others, claiming that they illegally obtained and used its proprietary technology in their production processes [2]. Group 2: Allegations and Counterclaims - Yongtai Technology accuses Tianci Materials of spreading misleading information about its alleged infringement of commercial secrets over the past two years, which has severely damaged its reputation and caused significant financial losses [1]. - Tianci Materials claims that Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary used illegally obtained technology in their 134,000-ton liquid lithium salt project, and is seeking 887 million yuan in damages along with public apologies from the defendants [2]. Group 3: Project Status - Yongtai Technology's 134,000-ton liquid lithium salt project has completed equipment installation and is in trial production, although the company currently only produces solid lithium hexafluorophosphate and has not yet started selling the liquid lithium salt products involved in the dispute [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Liu Genghong's alleged borrowing of 7 million TWD (approximately 1.68 million RMB) and the subsequent clarification issued by his studio regarding the situation [1]. Group 1 - Liu Genghong was reported to have borrowed 7 million TWD and failed to repay it for 9 years, which led to public scrutiny [1]. - The studio clarified that Liu Genghong was not the actual borrower but acted as a guarantor for a friend who borrowed the money, and he repaid the loan when the friend was unable to do so [1]. - The studio stated that there are no ongoing disputes or lawsuits involving Liu Genghong related to this matter, and they reserve the right to take legal action against those spreading false information [1]. Group 2 - The studio advised the public to think carefully when acting as guarantors for others, highlighting the risks and responsibilities involved to avoid unnecessary disputes [2]. Group 3 - Liu Genghong is a well-known singer, actor, and fitness influencer, gaining significant popularity in 2022 with a fitness routine that attracted over 70 million fans [5].