网络非法外之地，我们尊重并接受社会各界监督与建议，但也坚决打击一切恶意捏造、抹黑诋毁的行为。 据长安汽车不实信息举报中心公众号，长安汽车表示，如发现有损害长安汽车及旗下品牌声誉的线索，我们欢迎大家通过公众号"长安汽车不实信息举报 中心"积极反馈。经核实有效后，将依据价值给予最高100万元奖励。 每经编辑｜张锦河 2月13日，长安汽车法务部发文称，近期，长安汽车就自媒体"武当云中客"、"小明同学看车"涉嫌网络侵权的行为，向法院提起诉讼，现已立案受理。 有网友回忆，此前曾刷到过两个账号发布的相关内容，其中部分表述与长安汽车官方信息存在明显偏差。有业内人士推测，其被起诉的具体原因，大概率 是发布了未经核实的车型质量缺陷、虚假宣传等不实言论，误导消费者的同时，损害了长安汽车的品牌形象。 每日经济新闻综合长安汽车法务部、大河报 据悉，两大自媒体被起诉的核心原因，是涉嫌发布恶意捏造、抹黑诋毁长安汽车及旗下品牌声誉的内容，违反网络传播相关规定，构成侵权。 据大河报，不少关注汽车领域的网友发现，近期"武当云中客""小明同学看车"的部分内容已无法正常查看，此前这两个账号常发布汽车测评、车型解读类 内容，在汽车爱好者群体中拥有一 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of "胖东来" suing online defamer highlights the necessity of legal action against malicious online behavior to protect corporate reputation and maintain a healthy business environment [1] Group 1: Incident Overview - In March 2025, online influencer 柴怼怼 made defamatory remarks about "胖东来," claiming their jade products were of poor quality and overpriced, which quickly gained traction online [2][3] - The defamatory video attracted significant attention, leading to a surge in 柴怼怼's viewership and follower count [3] Group 2: Response from "胖东来" - In response to the malicious attacks, "胖东来" attempted to clarify its position by disclosing the sourcing, quality control processes, and pricing logic of its jade products [4] - Despite these efforts, misinformation continued to spread, damaging the company's reputation [4] Group 3: Legal Action - "胖东来" and its representative initiated a civil lawsuit against 柴怼怼 to hold them accountable for the defamatory statements, aiming to protect their brand integrity [7] - The court issued a preliminary ruling requiring 柴怼怼 to delete the defamatory video and cease further defamatory content [8] Group 4: Court Findings - The court found that 柴怼怼's statements were false and malicious, with the video accumulating over 7 million views, leading to significant public distrust towards "胖东来" [12] - The court ordered 柴怼怼 to stop the infringement, delete the video, publicly apologize, and pay damages totaling 2.6 million yuan [12] Group 5: Legal Implications - The case represents a significant step in addressing online defamation, with the court emphasizing the need to respect legitimate business operations while punishing malicious slander [14]

Core Viewpoint - The phenomenon of sharing children's photos online raises significant concerns regarding portrait infringement, privacy breaches, and personal safety, prompting discussions on the protection of minors in the digital age [1] Group 1: Infringement Issues - A 17-year-old girl has been suffering from photo theft, where impostors use her images to create fake accounts, charging fees to access her friends' circle [2] - A clothing company unlawfully used 19 images of a minor for promotional purposes without obtaining necessary permissions, and despite a court ruling, the company continues to exploit these images [4] - A case in Guangzhou involved a defendant using a minor's real name and image to harass and defame them online, severely disrupting the minor's normal life and studies [6] Group 2: Regulatory Measures - The Cyberspace Administration of China and eight other departments have introduced a classification method for online information that may affect minors' mental health, effective from March 1, 2026, addressing issues like the misuse of minors' images [6] - Platforms are encouraged to enhance their content governance systems, establish special protection mechanisms for minors, and improve user privacy protection [7] Group 3: Parental Guidance - Parents are advised to adopt a "protect before sharing" mindset, carefully reviewing content before posting, and limiting the dissemination of their children's images [7] - In cases of infringement, parents should document evidence and report to platforms or pursue legal action to ensure accountability [7]

Core Viewpoint - The company has issued a formal statement regarding the protection of its and its employees' legal rights, addressing ongoing defamatory actions and false statements made by certain infringing parties on internet platforms [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Responses - The company has initiated comprehensive legal protection procedures, including evidence collection, investigation of leads, and legal accountability, in response to serious infringements that have harmed its corporate reputation and the personal rights of its employees [1][4]. - For infringers who acknowledge their illegal actions and voluntarily delete harmful content and apologize, the company has handled these cases cautiously [1][4]. - Legal actions have been initiated against particularly egregious infringers, with some individuals already subjected to administrative detention by law enforcement [1][4]. Group 2: Warnings and Future Actions - The company warns that the internet is not a lawless space, and any actions that infringe upon others' legal rights may violate civil, administrative, and even criminal laws [2][5]. - The company will intensify its efforts to hold infringing parties accountable for all legal responsibilities, including civil, administrative, and criminal liabilities, without leniency [2][5]. - A call is made to the public to maintain a civilized and lawful online environment, emphasizing that all individuals and organizations must be responsible for their online statements [2][5]. Group 3: Commitment to Rights Protection - The company remains committed to defending the legal rights of itself and its employees, stating that it will continue to pursue legal actions against all forms of online infringement [2][5]. - The company respects citizens' rights to free speech but firmly opposes any form of online infringement [2][5].

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court ruled in favor of Dongfang Zhenxuan in a defamation case against Zhang, requiring him to publicly apologize and pay 200,000 yuan for spreading false information about the company [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court found that Zhang, using the ID "Shuoshuren Tutu," had been making defamatory statements about Dongfang Zhenxuan on various social media platforms since 2024 [1]. - The court emphasized that Zhang continued to post videos and conduct live streams during the trial, attempting to profit from the situation by discussing the lawsuit [1]. - Zhang is required to post a public apology on platforms like Douyin and WeChat Video for at least seven days and has already taken down the infringing content [2]. Group 2: Industry Context - The case highlights a growing trend in the e-commerce industry where creating sensational content to attract public attention can lead to the spread of harmful and defamatory information [1]. - Previous cases involving Dongfang Zhenxuan indicate a pattern of legal action against online defamation, with another individual, Cui, being ordered to apologize and pay 36,000 yuan for similar offenses [3]. - The court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the impact of exaggerated and misleading content on social media, urging for a more responsible online discourse [2].

Core Viewpoint - BYD has successfully defended its brand reputation through legal action against malicious online attacks, highlighting the importance of protecting corporate integrity in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle industry [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Outcomes - Recently, BYD won a lawsuit against social media accounts "Long Ge Talks Electric Cars" and "Full Charge New Energy," which were found guilty of spreading false information that harmed BYD's brand reputation, resulting in a compensation of 2 million yuan [1]. - This is not the first instance of BYD using legal means to protect its rights; previous cases include a ruling against "Wang Wukong Talks Cars," which resulted in a compensation of 313,800 yuan, and "Long Zhu - Collect Cars," which was ordered to pay 2,018,700 yuan for defamation [3][4]. Group 2: Industry Context and Implications - The malicious defamation incidents involving accounts like "Long Ge Talks Electric Cars" and "Wang Wukong Talks Cars" are indicative of a broader issue within the electric vehicle sector, where leading companies face frequent online attacks [6]. - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has taken action against accounts that distort facts and maliciously defame car companies, emphasizing the need for a clearer regulatory environment to protect corporate reputations [6]. - Analysts suggest that BYD's legal victories not only safeguard its brand but also set a precedent for the industry, establishing a boundary for online discourse and promoting a healthier competitive landscape in the electric vehicle market [7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy involving a village official selling millet online and being accused by Xiaomi of "associating with Lei's marketing" has sparked significant public interest. Xiaomi clarified that their complaint was not against the use of the term "millet" or the sale of millet products, but rather against the malicious imitation and defamation of their executives [1][10]. Group 1: Xiaomi's Response - Xiaomi's spokesperson emphasized that the claims made in the viral video were completely false and a distortion of facts, clarifying that the complaint was aimed at protecting the company's reputation and not at restricting the use of the term "millet" [1][2]. - The company has a history of supporting agricultural initiatives and rural revitalization, having donated to schools and farms in various provinces including Guizhou, Yunnan, Hunan, Hebei, and Xinjiang [1][2]. Group 2: Legal and Social Implications - The company called for a collective effort against false online information and actions that provoke public sentiment, aiming to create a healthier online discourse [2][3]. - The involved village official, known as "Xiao Feng," later issued an apology, acknowledging that his video had caused an impact on Xiaomi and wasted social resources, and committed to regulating his online behavior in the future [6][10]. Group 3: Details of the Complaint - The complaint against the village official included allegations of using exaggerated expressions and imitating Xiaomi's executives in a misleading manner, which could confuse the public and damage the company's image [4][19]. - Legal experts indicated that if the video used Lei Jun's name or likeness, it could potentially infringe on his rights, including name and reputation [19].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving an intern winning a graphics card during a business trip has led to widespread misinformation, mistakenly implicating the well-known gaming company "Zilong Games" in the controversy [2][3]. Group 1: Incident Background - An intern named Xiao Jin won a GeForce RTX 5060 graphics card valued at approximately 3000 yuan during a business trip but faced pressure from colleagues to hand it over to the company [2]. - The situation escalated as misinformation spread online, incorrectly identifying the company involved as "Zilong Games," resulting in significant negative attention and accusations directed at the company [2][3]. Group 2: Zilong Games' Official Response - Zilong Games issued a formal statement clarifying that there is no connection between the company and the incident, confirming that none of its subsidiaries participated in the event where the graphics card was won [3]. - The company highlighted the negative impact of the false information, which has led to reputational damage and disruptions in its recruitment process, and announced legal actions against those spreading misinformation [3][4]. Group 3: Call for Rational Discourse - Zilong Games urged the public to approach online information critically and to cease the dissemination of false information and malicious attacks, emphasizing the need for a healthy online environment [4].

Core Viewpoint - BYD has won a legal case against "Wang Wukong Says Car" and related accounts for online defamation, resulting in a court order for public apology and compensation totaling 313,800 yuan [1] Group 1: Legal Outcome - The court ruled that the defendants made derogatory statements about BYD's Fangchengbao brand vehicles, damaging the brand's reputation [1] - The defendants are required to publicly apologize to BYD in the People's Court Newspaper [1] - The total compensation awarded to BYD amounts to 313,800 yuan [1]

网信办：近期，有网络账号利用AI技术仿冒公众人物形象，在直播、短视频等环节发布营销信息，误导网民，涉嫌虚假宣传和网络侵权，严重破坏网络生态，造成不良影响。下一步，对利用AI仿冒公众人物开展直播营销问题保持高压严管态势，对恶意营销账号，发现一批、处置一批、曝光一批。 https://t.co/KFzoxKhaQB ...