近日山东一村支书称在网上卖农作物小米，被小米公司法务以"关联雷氏营销"为由投诉下架视频，引起热议。12月12日下午，@小米公司发言人 发布澄 清说明，回应所谓"小米公司不让卖小米"一事，主要内容如下： 关于近日某社交媒体账号发布视频 ，歪曲事实、恶意造谣所谓"小米公司不让卖小米"一事，向大家特别澄清说明： "相关视频内容，完全失实，是彻头彻尾的歪曲与污蔑。此前，我司对该账号部分内容的投诉，针对的是其恶意模仿、捏造污蔑，对我司及我司高管名誉 的侵害行为，并非针对"小米"二字或"小米"农产品的正常使用。将投诉行为曲解为"不让用'小米'二字"，是偷换概念，以"助农"议题为名，行污蔑造谣、 博取流量之实。 长期以来，小米一直积极支农、助农，通过各种方式助力乡村振兴，履行社会责任。目前，小米已在贵州、云南、湖南、河北、新疆等多地捐赠支持乡村 学校及农场发展。以"小米图书馆"为例，2019年起，小米公益基金会向新疆、云南、贵州等地捐赠建立7所小米图书馆，并持续捐赠资金，支持开展乡村 文化及教育振兴。 运用法律武器，坚决维护自身合法权益，是每个人、每个机构的正当权利。感谢大家对小米的关注和支持，我们也呼吁大家一起，坚决对虚 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving an intern winning a graphics card during a business trip has led to widespread misinformation, mistakenly implicating the well-known gaming company "Zilong Games" in the controversy [2][3]. Group 1: Incident Background - An intern named Xiao Jin won a GeForce RTX 5060 graphics card valued at approximately 3000 yuan during a business trip but faced pressure from colleagues to hand it over to the company [2]. - The situation escalated as misinformation spread online, incorrectly identifying the company involved as "Zilong Games," resulting in significant negative attention and accusations directed at the company [2][3]. Group 2: Zilong Games' Official Response - Zilong Games issued a formal statement clarifying that there is no connection between the company and the incident, confirming that none of its subsidiaries participated in the event where the graphics card was won [3]. - The company highlighted the negative impact of the false information, which has led to reputational damage and disruptions in its recruitment process, and announced legal actions against those spreading misinformation [3][4]. Group 3: Call for Rational Discourse - Zilong Games urged the public to approach online information critically and to cease the dissemination of false information and malicious attacks, emphasizing the need for a healthy online environment [4].

Core Viewpoint - BYD has won a legal case against "Wang Wukong Says Car" and related accounts for online defamation, resulting in a court order for public apology and compensation totaling 313,800 yuan [1] Group 1: Legal Outcome - The court ruled that the defendants made derogatory statements about BYD's Fangchengbao brand vehicles, damaging the brand's reputation [1] - The defendants are required to publicly apologize to BYD in the People's Court Newspaper [1] - The total compensation awarded to BYD amounts to 313,800 yuan [1]

网信办：近期，有网络账号利用AI技术仿冒公众人物形象，在直播、短视频等环节发布营销信息，误导网民，涉嫌虚假宣传和网络侵权，严重破坏网络生态，造成不良影响。下一步，对利用AI仿冒公众人物开展直播营销问题保持高压严管态势，对恶意营销账号，发现一批、处置一批、曝光一批。 https://t.co/KFzoxKhaQB ...

Core Viewpoint - The company is actively pursuing legal actions against malicious online activities and false statements that harm its reputation and the online environment [1] Group 1: Legal Actions and Monitoring - Since 2025, the company’s legal department has completed legal assessments on 16,465 pieces of online sentiment data, focusing on monitoring 231 online accounts [1] - The company has filed civil lawsuits against 92 malicious infringement accounts to hold the infringers legally accountable, with some cases already in court [1] - The company has initiated a total of 35 lawsuits to assist car owners who have been unjustly attacked online, indicating a commitment to protecting its customers [1] Group 2: Commitment to Brand Protection - The company adopts a "zero tolerance" approach towards online infringement and will enhance sentiment monitoring to ensure accountability [1] - The legal department will utilize legal means to combat all forms of infringement, aiming to protect brand reputation and user reputation [1] - The company emphasizes that the online space is not lawless and that freedom of speech has its limits, urging respect for facts and rational discourse [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a case where a video blogger, Mr. Deng, criticized a hospital for high medical fees, leading to a lawsuit from the hospital for defamation and seeking an apology and compensation [1] Group 1 - Mr. Deng has a significant online following, with over 100,000 fans, and he used his platform to express dissatisfaction with his medical experience [1] - The hospital claims that Mr. Deng's videos have harmed its reputation, prompting legal action against him [1] - The lawsuit highlights ongoing tensions between healthcare providers and patients regarding transparency and perceived fairness in medical billing [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company is actively combating malicious online defamation and misinformation during a significant transformation in the automotive industry, emphasizing the importance of fair competition and legal protection of its reputation [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Actions - The company adheres to compliant operations and utilizes legal means to protect its rights and reputation against malicious infringement [2]. - Recent legal actions have resulted in a court ruling against an account that maliciously attacked the company, leading to a compensation of 200,000 yuan and a requirement for public apology [3]. - Multiple accounts have been identified for spreading defamatory content, and legal actions have led to the deletion of harmful posts and public apologies from the operators [4]. Group 2: Industry Context - The automotive industry is undergoing a profound transformation, where healthy competition should drive technological advancement, but some media outlets exploit the situation to spread false information [2]. - The actions taken by the company are part of a broader initiative to maintain market order and support industry upgrades amidst challenges posed by misinformation [2].

Core Viewpoint - The company, BYD, is actively combating organized malicious attacks and defamation from online black media and public relations, which have severely harmed its reputation and disrupted market order [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions Against Defamation - BYD has taken legal action against various online accounts for defamation, resulting in court rulings that include public apologies and financial compensation. For instance, the account "周浩然Sean" was ordered to pay 100,000 yuan for defamation [1]. - Another account, "AutoBiBiBi," was similarly found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay 100,000 yuan [1]. - The accounts "淘电池taodianchi" and "尹哥讲电车" were judged to have engaged in unfair competition, leading to a compensation of 60,000 yuan [1]. - An account spreading false information about BYD's financial status was penalized by law enforcement for disseminating false information [1]. Group 2: Ongoing Investigations and Rewards - The account "葡萄碎XXX" was administratively detained for spreading false information about vehicle explosions [2]. - The account "假XXX" is under investigation for continuously publishing defamatory content against BYD [2]. - The company has initiated legal proceedings against malicious self-media that have caused significant negative impact [2]. - BYD is offering rewards ranging from 50,000 to 5 million yuan for credible leads on black public relations activities, with a contact provided for submissions [2]. Group 3: Commitment to Legal Rights - BYD emphasizes its commitment to respecting societal suggestions and supervision while asserting that the internet is not a lawless space, and it will continue to use legal means to protect its rights against any form of insult, defamation, or infringement [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court upheld the first-instance ruling in the case of online infringement involving Dongfang Zhenxuan and a user named Cui, requiring Cui to publicly apologize and compensate Dongfang Zhenxuan 36,000 yuan [1][6]. Group 1: Court Ruling Details - The court ruled that Cui's statements were false and infringed upon Dongfang Zhenxuan's reputation, leading to a negative impact on its business operations [2][3]. - Cui is required to post a public apology on his Douyin accounts "东坡妹妹" and "Lily," maintaining the apology for at least 168 hours [3][6]. - The court found that the first-instance ruling was factually clear and legally correct, thus rejecting Cui's appeal [6][8]. Group 2: Background of the Case - The case originated from Cui's false claims regarding Dongfang Zhenxuan's financial dealings with the Guizhou provincial government, alleging that the company charged a seven-figure promotional fee [2][8]. - The false statements made by Cui garnered over 4.3 million views and more than 8,000 likes, significantly misleading the public [2][3]. - Dongfang Zhenxuan had previously issued a statement clarifying that it never requested promotional fees from the government or any businesses [2][3]. Group 3: Company Response and Future Actions - Dongfang Zhenxuan expressed its commitment to using legal means to protect its rights against malicious rumors and defamation [3][6]. - The company thanked its supporters for their ongoing concern and support throughout the legal proceedings [4][6].

Core Viewpoint - Oriental Selection has successfully defended its legal rights against online defamation, with a court ruling in its favor regarding a case involving false accusations made by an individual named Cui [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On May 23, the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court upheld the original ruling in the defamation case against Cui, rejecting his appeal and confirming the first-instance judgment [1] - The final ruling requires Cui to publicly apologize on his Douyin account and pay Oriental Selection 36,000 yuan in damages [1] Group 2: Company Response - Oriental Selection has stated its commitment to using legal means to protect its rights against malicious rumors and online defamation [1] - The company clarified that it has never charged the Guizhou provincial government any promotional fees during its cultural tourism live-streaming events, countering Cui's claims of receiving seven-digit fees [1] Group 3: Ongoing Issues - Despite the court ruling, Cui continued to disseminate defamatory videos and false statements about Oriental Selection [1] - Oriental Selection has reiterated its policy of not charging placement fees to businesses or merchants [1]