本文来自微信公众号"大象新闻" 1月21日晚，德云社官方微博发布"关于依法维护我司及员工合法权益的严正声明"，内容如下： 在此，我司严正警告所有仍在实施或可能实施类似侵权行为的组织或个人：互联网绝非法外之地，任何利用网络侵害他人合法权益之行为，均可能同时触 犯民事、行政乃至刑事法律规定。对于经警示仍拒不停止实施侵权行为、删除侵权信息、消除影响的侵权主体，我司将不再予以宽限，坚决依法采取法律 手段追究其民事、行政乃至刑事法律责任，依法捍卫我司及全体员工的合法权益，维权到底。 近期，我司发现部分侵权主体在互联网平台持续针对我司及员工，实施捏造虚假事实、散布侮辱性言论、恶意诽谤等侵权行为。该行为已严重侵害我司的 企业商誉及相关人员的名誉权，破坏清朗网络生态环境，已对我司及相关人员的正常工作和生活秩序造成了实质性干扰。对此，我司法务部门已启动全面 维权程序，严格依据相关法律法规，开展证据固定、线索核查及法律追责工作。现将阶段性进展及我司严正立场声明如下： 针对部分及时认识到自身行为违法性质的侵权者，在其主动删除侵权内容、消除影响并公开致歉后，我司已审慎处理；对于情节恶劣的部分侵权者，我司 已依法启动相关法律程序，其中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court ruled in favor of Dongfang Zhenxuan in a defamation case against Zhang, requiring him to publicly apologize and pay 200,000 yuan for spreading false information about the company [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court found that Zhang, using the ID "Shuoshuren Tutu," had been making defamatory statements about Dongfang Zhenxuan on various social media platforms since 2024 [1]. - The court emphasized that Zhang continued to post videos and conduct live streams during the trial, attempting to profit from the situation by discussing the lawsuit [1]. - Zhang is required to post a public apology on platforms like Douyin and WeChat Video for at least seven days and has already taken down the infringing content [2]. Group 2: Industry Context - The case highlights a growing trend in the e-commerce industry where creating sensational content to attract public attention can lead to the spread of harmful and defamatory information [1]. - Previous cases involving Dongfang Zhenxuan indicate a pattern of legal action against online defamation, with another individual, Cui, being ordered to apologize and pay 36,000 yuan for similar offenses [3]. - The court's ruling reflects a broader concern about the impact of exaggerated and misleading content on social media, urging for a more responsible online discourse [2].

Core Viewpoint - BYD has successfully defended its brand reputation through legal action against malicious online attacks, highlighting the importance of protecting corporate integrity in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle industry [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Outcomes - Recently, BYD won a lawsuit against social media accounts "Long Ge Talks Electric Cars" and "Full Charge New Energy," which were found guilty of spreading false information that harmed BYD's brand reputation, resulting in a compensation of 2 million yuan [1]. - This is not the first instance of BYD using legal means to protect its rights; previous cases include a ruling against "Wang Wukong Talks Cars," which resulted in a compensation of 313,800 yuan, and "Long Zhu - Collect Cars," which was ordered to pay 2,018,700 yuan for defamation [3][4]. Group 2: Industry Context and Implications - The malicious defamation incidents involving accounts like "Long Ge Talks Electric Cars" and "Wang Wukong Talks Cars" are indicative of a broader issue within the electric vehicle sector, where leading companies face frequent online attacks [6]. - The Central Cyberspace Administration of China has taken action against accounts that distort facts and maliciously defame car companies, emphasizing the need for a clearer regulatory environment to protect corporate reputations [6]. - Analysts suggest that BYD's legal victories not only safeguard its brand but also set a precedent for the industry, establishing a boundary for online discourse and promoting a healthier competitive landscape in the electric vehicle market [7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy involving a village official selling millet online and being accused by Xiaomi of "associating with Lei's marketing" has sparked significant public interest. Xiaomi clarified that their complaint was not against the use of the term "millet" or the sale of millet products, but rather against the malicious imitation and defamation of their executives [1][10]. Group 1: Xiaomi's Response - Xiaomi's spokesperson emphasized that the claims made in the viral video were completely false and a distortion of facts, clarifying that the complaint was aimed at protecting the company's reputation and not at restricting the use of the term "millet" [1][2]. - The company has a history of supporting agricultural initiatives and rural revitalization, having donated to schools and farms in various provinces including Guizhou, Yunnan, Hunan, Hebei, and Xinjiang [1][2]. Group 2: Legal and Social Implications - The company called for a collective effort against false online information and actions that provoke public sentiment, aiming to create a healthier online discourse [2][3]. - The involved village official, known as "Xiao Feng," later issued an apology, acknowledging that his video had caused an impact on Xiaomi and wasted social resources, and committed to regulating his online behavior in the future [6][10]. Group 3: Details of the Complaint - The complaint against the village official included allegations of using exaggerated expressions and imitating Xiaomi's executives in a misleading manner, which could confuse the public and damage the company's image [4][19]. - Legal experts indicated that if the video used Lei Jun's name or likeness, it could potentially infringe on his rights, including name and reputation [19].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving an intern winning a graphics card during a business trip has led to widespread misinformation, mistakenly implicating the well-known gaming company "Zilong Games" in the controversy [2][3]. Group 1: Incident Background - An intern named Xiao Jin won a GeForce RTX 5060 graphics card valued at approximately 3000 yuan during a business trip but faced pressure from colleagues to hand it over to the company [2]. - The situation escalated as misinformation spread online, incorrectly identifying the company involved as "Zilong Games," resulting in significant negative attention and accusations directed at the company [2][3]. Group 2: Zilong Games' Official Response - Zilong Games issued a formal statement clarifying that there is no connection between the company and the incident, confirming that none of its subsidiaries participated in the event where the graphics card was won [3]. - The company highlighted the negative impact of the false information, which has led to reputational damage and disruptions in its recruitment process, and announced legal actions against those spreading misinformation [3][4]. Group 3: Call for Rational Discourse - Zilong Games urged the public to approach online information critically and to cease the dissemination of false information and malicious attacks, emphasizing the need for a healthy online environment [4].

Core Viewpoint - BYD has won a legal case against "Wang Wukong Says Car" and related accounts for online defamation, resulting in a court order for public apology and compensation totaling 313,800 yuan [1] Group 1: Legal Outcome - The court ruled that the defendants made derogatory statements about BYD's Fangchengbao brand vehicles, damaging the brand's reputation [1] - The defendants are required to publicly apologize to BYD in the People's Court Newspaper [1] - The total compensation awarded to BYD amounts to 313,800 yuan [1]

网信办：近期，有网络账号利用AI技术仿冒公众人物形象，在直播、短视频等环节发布营销信息，误导网民，涉嫌虚假宣传和网络侵权，严重破坏网络生态，造成不良影响。下一步，对利用AI仿冒公众人物开展直播营销问题保持高压严管态势，对恶意营销账号，发现一批、处置一批、曝光一批。 https://t.co/KFzoxKhaQB ...

Core Viewpoint - The company is actively pursuing legal actions against malicious online activities and false statements that harm its reputation and the online environment [1] Group 1: Legal Actions and Monitoring - Since 2025, the company’s legal department has completed legal assessments on 16,465 pieces of online sentiment data, focusing on monitoring 231 online accounts [1] - The company has filed civil lawsuits against 92 malicious infringement accounts to hold the infringers legally accountable, with some cases already in court [1] - The company has initiated a total of 35 lawsuits to assist car owners who have been unjustly attacked online, indicating a commitment to protecting its customers [1] Group 2: Commitment to Brand Protection - The company adopts a "zero tolerance" approach towards online infringement and will enhance sentiment monitoring to ensure accountability [1] - The legal department will utilize legal means to combat all forms of infringement, aiming to protect brand reputation and user reputation [1] - The company emphasizes that the online space is not lawless and that freedom of speech has its limits, urging respect for facts and rational discourse [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a case where a video blogger, Mr. Deng, criticized a hospital for high medical fees, leading to a lawsuit from the hospital for defamation and seeking an apology and compensation [1] Group 1 - Mr. Deng has a significant online following, with over 100,000 fans, and he used his platform to express dissatisfaction with his medical experience [1] - The hospital claims that Mr. Deng's videos have harmed its reputation, prompting legal action against him [1] - The lawsuit highlights ongoing tensions between healthcare providers and patients regarding transparency and perceived fairness in medical billing [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company is actively combating malicious online defamation and misinformation during a significant transformation in the automotive industry, emphasizing the importance of fair competition and legal protection of its reputation [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Actions - The company adheres to compliant operations and utilizes legal means to protect its rights and reputation against malicious infringement [2]. - Recent legal actions have resulted in a court ruling against an account that maliciously attacked the company, leading to a compensation of 200,000 yuan and a requirement for public apology [3]. - Multiple accounts have been identified for spreading defamatory content, and legal actions have led to the deletion of harmful posts and public apologies from the operators [4]. Group 2: Industry Context - The automotive industry is undergoing a profound transformation, where healthy competition should drive technological advancement, but some media outlets exploit the situation to spread false information [2]. - The actions taken by the company are part of a broader initiative to maintain market order and support industry upgrades amidst challenges posed by misinformation [2].