Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing demand for employee retraining due to the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) across various sectors in the UAE [1] - By 2027, it is projected that 44% of the global workforce will face the risk of skill obsolescence [1] - The usage rate of generative AI in human resources has surged from 19% in 2023 to 61% [1] Industry Trends - Employers are placing greater emphasis on the combination of technical and soft skills, with digital literacy, adaptability, leadership, and multilingual abilities being particularly crucial [1] - In the UAE, resumes that emphasize AI proficiency, sustainability awareness, and problem-solving skills are becoming more competitive [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of leadership styles in the context of technological change and workforce management, emphasizing that effective leaders should balance both hard and compassionate approaches to employee management [3][7]. Group 1: Leadership Styles - Leaders can be categorized into two types: empathetic and indifferent, with the best leaders embodying both traits [3]. - Empathetic leaders consider the impact of job losses on employees, while indifferent leaders focus on the inevitability of technological disruption and the need for employees to adapt [4]. Group 2: Investment in Employees - Retraining existing employees is often more cost-effective than hiring new ones, with costs for replacing an employee potentially reaching 3 to 4.5 times their salary [4]. - Investing in employee retraining boosts morale and engagement, as employees feel valued when companies prioritize their development [5]. - Organizational knowledge is a priceless asset, and experienced employees can provide insights that are crucial for solving future challenges [6]. Group 3: Balancing Management Approaches - Effective leaders view employees as valuable resources that require investment to drive company growth, rather than as interchangeable parts [7]. - The article argues against the false dichotomy of hard versus soft management styles, advocating for a combination of both to achieve great leadership [7].