Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's strong condemnation of the United States' unilateral and illegal actions regarding Venezuela, highlighting the need for adherence to international law and peaceful resolution of disputes [3][4]. Group 1: China's Position on U.S. Actions - China expresses deep shock and strong condemnation of the U.S. sanctions and military threats against Venezuela, which have raised significant concerns in the international community [3]. - The Chinese representative calls for the U.S. to respect the overwhelming international calls to stop infringing on Venezuela's sovereignty and to return to dialogue and negotiation for political solutions [4]. - China supports the UN Security Council's primary responsibility in maintaining international peace and security and encourages efforts that promote dialogue and de-escalation [4][5]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - The article references historical lessons, stating that military means are not a solution and that the abuse of force leads to greater crises, citing past U.S. military actions in Iraq and Iran as examples [4][5]. - It asserts that Venezuela, as an independent sovereign nation, has the right to defend its sovereignty and dignity, and that Latin American and Caribbean countries play a crucial role in maintaining global peace and development [5]. Group 3: Call for Respect and Cooperation - China urges the U.S. to stop its bullying tactics and to develop relations with regional countries based on mutual respect, equality, and non-interference in internal affairs [5]. - The article concludes with China's commitment to work with regional countries and the international community to strengthen cooperation and uphold fairness and justice in maintaining peace and stability in Latin America and the Caribbean [5].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's military actions against Venezuela have faced ongoing international opposition, with six countries expressing concerns about the dangerous precedent it sets for regional peace and security [1][2]. Group 1: International Response - Six countries, including Colombia, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Uruguay, and Spain, issued a joint statement opposing unilateral military actions against Venezuela, emphasizing the need for dialogue and negotiation to resolve the crisis peacefully [2]. - The statement highlighted that such military actions violate international law and the fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter, advocating for a peaceful resolution led by the Venezuelan people without external interference [2]. Group 2: U.S. Position - President Trump threatened Venezuela's interim president, stating that failure to comply with U.S. demands would result in severe consequences, potentially more significant than those faced by Maduro [3]. - Trump indicated that Venezuela might not be the last country subject to U.S. intervention, underscoring a broader strategy of U.S. involvement in the region [4]. Group 3: Venezuela's Military Readiness - Venezuela's Defense Ministry announced a state of full military readiness, with the military prepared to use all available forces to defend the nation against perceived imperialist aggression and to ensure national freedom, independence, and sovereignty [5]. - The Venezuelan government condemned the U.S. for allegedly kidnapping President Maduro and for the violent actions against its security personnel and civilians [5].

Group 1 - The establishment of the International Mediation Institute marks a historic breakthrough in international dispute resolution, providing a new platform for resolving disputes between nations, as well as between nations and foreign investors [2] - The mediation approach respects the parties' intentions and allows for win-win solutions through neutral third-party assistance, which is particularly valuable in resolving complex international conflicts [2][4] - The current global landscape, characterized by intertwined conflicts and a demand for peaceful dispute resolution, highlights the urgency for dialogue and mediation as alternatives to unilateral sanctions and traditional judicial mechanisms [3][5] Group 2 - The International Mediation Institute aims to promote harmonious international relations and offers a flexible, economical, and efficient alternative to existing dispute resolution methods, complementing litigation and arbitration [4] - Hong Kong has been chosen as the headquarters for the International Mediation Institute, reflecting international recognition of its legal system and its role as a successful example of peaceful dispute resolution [4] - The mission of the International Mediation Institute is to foster dialogue and cooperation among nations, moving beyond zero-sum thinking to promote friendly resolutions to disputes [5]