炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ "王老吉"商标大战硝烟再起，加多宝集团和广州王老吉大健康产业有限公司双方针对"王老吉"境外商标 问题各执一词。 10月10日，"加多宝凉茶"微信号发布加多宝集团关于海外"王老吉"商标所有权的声明。声明称，加多宝 集团自九十年代从王老吉后人手中取得祖传凉茶秘方及海外王老吉商标使用权，并于2000年代初合法获 得海外王老吉商标所有权，已经在全球60个主要国家和地区注册了王老吉商标。 此前9月30日，加多宝集团还发布公告称，关联公司万捷有限公司（Multi Access Limited）在加拿大联 邦法院及欧盟普通法院的多起诉讼中，均成功捍卫"王老吉"海外系列商标的合法权益。 当天，广州王老吉大健康产业有限公司则发布声明回应，指责加多宝集团就境外商标争议发布的声明严 重背离事实。多宝集团所谓"侵权、假冒、不正当竞争"的表述，是对商标法律定义的误读与误导，其通 过海外离岸关联公司万捷有限公司在全球60余个国家和地区进行恶意注册。 据马上赢零售监测的数据，2025年6月，在全国植物饮料类目中，王老吉占据46.33%市场份额，位列首 位，加多宝以2 ...

作者 | 何子维 编辑 ｜ 宝珠 视觉 | 顾芗 在很多人眼里，娃哈哈姓"宗"，是一个不折不扣的家族企业。 对于今时今日的宗家继承人宗馥莉而言，尽管家族内部麻烦缠身，但区区一个红色商标"娃哈哈"的使用 权，应当在这位女掌舵人的掌控之中。 但随着一桩一桩爆炸式事件的冲击，娃哈哈水面之下的谜团在逐步公开化。人们渐渐意识到 ， 眼下， 宗馥莉似乎在有些被动地与"娃哈哈"挥手作别。 ，， 9月，一份有关娃哈哈的内部通知流传开来，宣告宗馥莉将从2026年起启用新品牌"娃小宗"，替代已有 近40年历史的"娃哈哈"。 事实上，类似"娃小宗"的如"娃小哈""宗小哈"等多个商标的酝酿已有多时。这些类似排列组合的文字， 早在今年初，就被申请注册在了宗馥莉完全控股的宏胜饮料集团有限公司旗下。 | | | VIP | | 商标状态 ▼ | 国际分类 ▼ | 申请日期 ▼ | 注册公告日期 * | Q 点击进行搜索 | 國 导出 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 商标信息 148 | 历史商标信息 36 | | | | | ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the delay in response from Ying's Holdings to the Beijing Stock Exchange's inquiry regarding its public offering application, with a request for an extension of 20 trading days to submit the response by September 4, 2025 [1] - The inquiry includes 13 questions focusing on the clarity of shareholding, stability of actual control, progress and impact of the "Ying's" trademark dispute, effectiveness of internal controls in the distribution model, and authenticity of terminal sales [1][3] Group 2 - Ying's Holdings, established in 2014, operates in the infant food and hygiene products sectors, with its "Ying's" brand leading in baby food sales for three consecutive years [2] - The company faces trademark disputes with another entity, YeeHoO, which specializes in high-end children's clothing and has been part of the Haian Group since 2017, leading to legal proceedings over shared brand names [2][3] Group 3 - Ying's Holdings has been criticized for its heavy marketing expenditures, which have significantly increased alongside its revenue growth, raising concerns about its focus on marketing over research and development [4][5] - From 2022 to 2024, Ying's Holdings reported revenues of 1.296 billion, 1.758 billion, and 1.974 billion yuan, with net profits of 117 million, 220 million, and 211 million yuan, reflecting a decline in profit growth in the latest year [4][5] Group 4 - The company’s sales expenses have also risen sharply, with figures of 454 million, 602 million, and 721 million yuan over the same period, indicating a sales expense ratio consistently above industry averages [5] - In contrast, research and development expenditures were significantly lower, with R&D personnel numbers and costs lagging behind sales expenses, prompting inquiries from the Beijing Stock Exchange regarding the rationale behind these financial allocations [5] Group 5 - The actual control of Ying's Holdings is held by three individuals, with a combined ownership of 52.02%, and they have signed a joint action agreement effective until December 2027 [6] - The Beijing Stock Exchange has requested further clarification on the relationships and agreements among various shareholders, including the rationale behind stock grants and transfers, to ensure transparency and compliance with regulations [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - TianNai Technology (688116) faces a significant setback as the National Intellectual Property Administration declared its "Cnano and logo" trademark invalid, reversing a previous court ruling in its favor [2][9]. Group 1: Trademark Dispute - The trademark dispute between TianNai Technology and Shandong Dazhan Nano Materials Co., Ltd. has been ongoing for several years, with a previous court ruling in 2023 favoring TianNai Technology [2][6]. - The National Intellectual Property Administration's recent ruling has prompted TianNai Technology to prepare for an appeal to the Beijing Intellectual Property Court [4][5]. - TianNai Technology claims that the trademark "Cnano" has established a strong association with its brand and has significant recognition in the industry [7][8]. Group 2: Market Position and Product Offerings - TianNai Technology specializes in the research, production, and application of carbon nanotubes and graphene, with products including carbon nanotube powder and conductive pastes [3]. - According to GGII statistics, TianNai Technology holds the leading market share in carbon nanotube conductive pastes, with shares of 40.3%, 46.7%, and 53.2% from 2022 to 2024, respectively [3]. Group 3: Company Strategy and Impact - The company has established a comprehensive intellectual property defense system and has registered alternative trademarks to mitigate potential impacts from the current dispute [5]. - TianNai Technology asserts that the trademark dispute will not significantly affect its core competitiveness or operational capabilities, regardless of the court's final decision [5].

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI has removed Jony Ive from its partnership section on the website due to trademark dispute issues, with both companies stating that the trademark complaint is "baseless" and will be addressed through legal means [1] Group 1 - OpenAI's action of removing Jony Ive indicates a significant response to the trademark complaint [1] - The companies involved are prepared to legally contest the trademark complaint, suggesting a potential escalation in the dispute [1]

Group 1 - OpenAI has removed Jony Ive from the partnership section of its website due to trademark dispute issues [1]