Core Viewpoint - The announcement from the Bengbu Market Supervision Administration reveals the results of food safety inspections, indicating that out of 188 batches tested, 179 were compliant while 9 were found to be non-compliant, highlighting ongoing food safety concerns in the region [2][11]. Summary by Categories Inspection Results - A total of 188 batches of various food products were sampled, including convenience foods, sugar, starch products, canned goods, beverages, condiments, and more [2]. - Among these, 179 batches were found to be compliant with national food safety standards, while 9 batches were deemed non-compliant [2]. Non-Compliant Products - Specific non-compliant products include: - Chopsticks used at Jin Feng Restaurant and Hot Spicy Era Hotpot, both found to contain anionic synthetic detergents exceeding safety standards [3][4]. - Star Anise sold at Century Hualian Supermarket, with sulfur dioxide residue exceeding the limit [5]. - Small Tai Mango sold at Jingyou Fresh Supermarket, containing pyraclostrobin above the permissible level [6]. - Yam sold at Meiyijia Supermarket and Yimufang Tian Fresh Supermarket, both containing excessive levels of mefenoxam and manganese mefenoxam [7][8]. - Fish sold at Sifang Lake Aquatic Store and Bullfrog at Qunli Street Farmers Market, both containing enrofloxacin above the safety threshold [9][10]. - Yangmei sold at Happy Purchase Supermarket, found to contain sodium saccharin, which is prohibited [11]. Regulatory Actions - The local market supervision authorities have mandated the responsible parties to trace the distribution of the non-compliant products, recall them, and take corrective actions to mitigate risks [11].

2025.07. 09 据南方都市报，近日，有网友发布视频称，其线下购买了娃哈哈营养快线，"开盖后喝了一口发现有蛆， 到店里又开一瓶也有蛆虫"，相关消息引发热议。 7月8日，娃哈哈相关人士表示，"产品在生产环节高温杀菌后不可能出现活物，技术人员初步判定是商家 仓储环境和条件有问题，虫子会顺着螺纹瓶盖钻进去，目前还在等监管部门的后续检测报告。" 推荐阅读 "黄金平替"，单日大跌6%！ 涉事网友称"到店里开了一瓶营养快线发现也有蛆虫"。 该网友在社交平台发布视频称，其到线下商店买了一瓶娃哈哈营养快线，"开盖后喝了一口竟发现有蛆， 随后回到店里又开了一瓶营养快线发现瓶口也有蛆虫。"南都记者注意到，目前该网友主页的相关视频已 查询不到。 另据奔流新闻报道，7月8日从云南曲靖市市场监督管理局了解到，目前此事已经解决，消费者和商家已 达成和解。 微信编辑 | 龙王 ...

仅有39岁的蒋凡，进入了阿里的权力核心。 2025 年6 月26 日，阿里在其年报中披露，阿里巴巴合伙人委员会成员更迭，电商事业群CEO 蒋凡首次入列。 一、来时与归去：国企VS民企 从马云到张勇，再到蔡吴搭档，以及冉冉升起的新星蒋凡，作为民企的阿里，在接班人的选择与交接上，充分开放，能者上位。 与阿里同处一城的娃哈哈，其路径却与阿里迥异——这家国资占据第一大股东的巨头，权力更迭在家族内部流动——从宗庆后到宗馥莉。 如何做好接班，是事关企业前途的关键命题，对于股权复杂的娃哈哈，尤为如此。 娃哈哈的特殊之处在于，其所有权和经营权分离，国资虽然身为第一大股东，但对于经营和接班，似乎并无足够的话语权。 虽然同处杭州，但某种程度上，阿里与娃哈哈不同源、不同路、不同命。 阿里是民企，由马云等人创立，通过风投机构获得发展资金，而后借势时代红利，跻身全球互联网巨头。 与阿里不同，虽然宗庆后是娃哈哈的精神图腾，但其实，娃哈哈并非原汁原味的民营企业。 从其改制历史来看，娃哈哈是从全民所有制，过渡改制到混合所有制。从经营体系来看，由于至今仍为第一大股东的国资充分放权，所以公司发展基本上 由宗庆后家族主导。 如何在权力交接中，既能 ...

Core Points - The transition of leadership at Wahaha has been marked by significant turmoil following the death of former chairman Zong Qinghou, with Zong Fu Li now at the helm [1][2] - The company is facing operational challenges, including forced employee relocations and production line shutdowns, which have raised concerns about its management and future direction [16][19] - The ambiguity surrounding Wahaha's status as a state-owned or private enterprise has led to ongoing debates about governance and asset management [4][11] Group 1: Leadership Transition - Zong Fu Li officially took over as the legal representative and chairman of Wahaha, indicating a complete leadership change [1] - The company has experienced a rapid decline in public trust and sales following a series of controversies surrounding Zong Fu Li's management style and decisions [2][22] - The leadership transition has been characterized by a stark contrast in management styles between Zong Fu Li and her predecessor, leading to employee dissatisfaction and operational disruptions [21][25] Group 2: Operational Challenges - Many production lines have been shut down since the Spring Festival, affecting approximately 1,500 employees and leading to significant income reductions for workers [16][19] - Employees have expressed confusion and frustration over the company's direction, questioning whether they are working for Wahaha or for Zong Fu Li personally [4][19] - The company has faced criticism for outsourcing production while its own lines remain inactive, raising quality concerns among consumers [16][19] Group 3: Corporate Structure and Governance - Wahaha's ownership structure is complex, with significant stakes held by both state-owned and private entities, leading to confusion about its classification as a state-owned or private enterprise [4][5] - The recent trademark transfer of the "Wahaha" brand has sparked debates about potential state asset losses, with legal implications still under scrutiny [11][13] - The historical context of Wahaha's establishment and its ties to state support complicate its current governance and operational strategies [6][7]

盛夏来临，冰茶市场持续升温。新老玩家推陈出新，主打"减糖"概念的冰茶饮品成为今夏新的饮品明 星。 亿欧智库在《2025中国瓶装冰红茶饮料行业白皮书》中指出，2023年，全球冰红茶市场规模达到533亿 美元，预计未来将以6.7%的年复合增长率保持良好的增长，并在2033年突破千亿规模，增长势头强 劲。 图片来源：亿欧智库《2025中国瓶装冰红茶饮料行业白皮书》 《白皮书》显示，71.4%的消费者将"减糖/无糖"标签作为选购冰红茶的主要依据，82.9%的用户明确偏 好减糖配方。 图片来源：亿欧智库《2025中国瓶装冰红茶饮料行业白皮书》 经营社区便利店经营十余年的张姐对此深有感触："以前年轻人买冰茶图便宜，现在他们更看重真材实 料和好口感。"以"健康化"为卖点的新锐品牌和产品正在快速重构新的行业生态。 冰茶进化史：从传统到健康化的变革之路 冰茶的起源可追溯至美国20世纪初的瓶装茶饮。国内则是在1993年，旭日升冰茶开创了国内冰茶品类的 先河；1996年，康师傅和统一相继推出冰红茶产品，凭借经典的柠檬风味和精准的市场定位，迅速占领 消费者心智。"那时候冰红茶就是夏天的代名词，谁在乎糖分？"外卖员李伟回忆道。随着公众 ...

夏日午后38℃的热浪舔舐着柏油路面，推开便利店玻璃门的瞬间，冷气裹挟着冷藏柜的凉意扑面而来，26岁的程序员王磊推开便利店大门，冷气裹挟着冷藏 柜的凉意扑面而来。他在琳琅满目的饮料前驻足片刻，拿起一瓶冰茶饮料："现在国家都提倡减糖了，这款糖少，喝起来没负担。" 盛夏来临，冰茶赛道的火药味比气温更灼人。元气森林凭借"减糖冰茶"持续霸榜消费者最爱，农夫山泉则直接以"冰茶"命名的新品强势入局。新老势力对 决，百亿冰茶市场争夺战打响！ 亿欧智库在《2025中国瓶装冰红茶饮料行业白皮书》中指出，2023年，全球冰红茶市场规模达到533亿美元，预计未来将以6.7%的年复合增长率保持良好的 增长，并在2033年突破千亿规模，增长势头强劲。 图片来源：亿欧智库《2025中国瓶装冰红茶饮料行业白皮书》 近年来，冰茶品类在饮品市场快速走红，成为夏季消费的新焦点。《白皮书》显示，71.4%的消费者将"减糖/无糖"标签作为选购冰红茶的主要依据，82.9% 的用户明确偏好减糖配方。 图片来源：亿欧智库《2025中国瓶装冰红茶饮料行业白皮书》 近年来，以"健康化"为卖点的新锐品牌和产品正在快速重构新的行业生态。经营社区便利店经营十余年的张 ...

编辑/出品 | 东针（未经允许，禁止转载） 娃哈哈在宗馥莉的掌舵下，经历了诸多变化与挑战，其发展轨迹备受关注。距离宗庆后这位传奇企业家 离世仅仅一年多，娃哈哈仿佛就换了一副模样，从产品质量争议到员工维权风波，从内部管理动荡到品 牌战略失误，一系列危机接踵而至，让人不禁感叹它与宗庆后时代相比，已面目全非。 宗庆后时代的娃哈哈，凭借着敏锐的市场洞察力、稳健的经营策略和强大的品牌影响力，成为了中国饮 料行业的领军者。 宗庆后本人更是以其独特的领导风格和坚韧不拔的精神，带领娃哈哈走过了一个又一个辉煌的阶段。但 随着宗庆后的离去，娃哈哈迎来了新的掌舵人——宗馥莉。这位有着"海归"背景的年轻企业家，一上任 便对宗庆后留下的"遗产"进行大刀阔斧的调整甚至颠覆。 她试图引入现代企业制度，推动娃哈哈的创新与变革，以适应快速变化的市场环境。但这一系列举措却 遭遇了来自内部的强势反弹，新旧观念的碰撞、利益格局的调整，让娃哈哈陷入了前所未有的复杂局 面。 在一系列铺天盖地的舆情中，商标转让事件成为了关键节点。商标作为企业的核心资产之一，其转让背 后涉及复杂的利益分配问题。不同利益方在商标归属、使用权限等方面存在着不同的诉求，这使得商 ...

Core Viewpoint - Wahaha is facing significant internal turmoil and allegations of profit transfer to external entities controlled by its executives, leading to concerns about its operational integrity and governance structure [1][3][4]. Group 1: Company Operations and Governance - Allegations have emerged that Wahaha's profits have been shifted to external companies controlled by its executives, rendering Wahaha nearly an "empty shell" [1][3]. - The company has reportedly shut down factories and transferred many operations to Hongsheng Group, raising concerns about the rights of state-owned shareholders [3][4]. - Since the takeover by Zong Fuli, there have been multiple controversies, including employee rights violations and labor disputes with subcontractors [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Despite the controversies, Wahaha is projected to achieve revenues exceeding 70 billion yuan in 2024, representing a growth of approximately 36.7% compared to 2023 [3][4]. - The asset proportion of Wahaha Group within the entire Wahaha system is only 15.67% as of the end of 2022, indicating a diminished role of state-owned assets in actual operations [6]. Group 3: Shareholding Structure and Disputes - Wahaha transitioned from 100% state-owned to a mixed ownership structure in 1999, with state ownership at 46%, Zong Qinghou's family holding 29.4%, and employee shareholding at 24.6% [4][6]. - There are ongoing disputes regarding the low-priced buyback of employee shares, with many employees claiming their rights have been infringed [7][10]. - The ownership and legal status of the Wahaha trademark remain contentious, with failed attempts to transfer the brand to Hongsheng Group [9][10]. Group 4: Future Prospects and Challenges - Zong Fuli has expressed intentions to pursue an IPO for Wahaha, which would require resolving complex shareholding and trademark issues [12][20]. - The company faces challenges in meeting the A-share listing requirements, particularly regarding the number of shareholders exceeding 200 due to the extensive employee shareholding [20][22]. - The need for a clear governance structure and resolution of historical issues is critical for Wahaha's future success and brand value preservation [22][23].

该报道还指出，目前的娃哈哈关停工厂、频繁代工后，不少娃哈哈的业务已经被转移到宏胜集团。现在的娃哈哈深陷国资股东权益被"悬空"等利益纠葛。此外，娃 哈哈在宗馥莉上台后，还陆续出现了员工权益被侵犯、代工厂劳资纠纷等一系列争议。 自接手娃哈哈以来，宗馥莉进行了一场大刀阔斧的变革。人事上一大批公司元老被换，生产端的代工厂停产，同时推行多元化投资布局，在健康、新能源等赛道 广泛出手。在改革的同时，娃哈哈2024年营收超过700亿，相比2023 年有大约36.7%的增长。 一边是业绩蒸蒸日上，一边却是企业的风波不断。宗庆后过世后的娃哈哈，为何总是伴随着各种纠纷和争议？媒体所指的股权争议，是否真的是宗馥莉在搞什么 暗箱操作呢？ 娃哈哈治理结构错综复杂 娃哈哈股权再现争议，该如何解决？ 上个月娃哈哈纯净水被曝由今麦郎代工的风波尚未平息。娃哈哈又在最近又迎来了一个大瓜。据《经济参考报》报道，有娃哈哈集团前高管称，娃哈哈产品的利 润已转移至娃哈哈集团高管掌控的体外企业，娃哈哈集团几成"空壳"。 需要说明的是，娃哈哈虽然是一家头部饮料企业，但作为非上市公司，我们能看到的企业数据资料实在太少了，以至于包括这篇报道在内的诸多猜测、质疑 ...

因此，围绕娃哈哈的争议需要回到这个原点，最是品牌不可辜负。也就是说，真正的问题，是如何维护 娃哈哈这个品牌的发展不受伤害，怎么进一步推动这个品牌的价值成长。 回头来看，如今娃哈哈饱受争议的体外运转模式，可以追溯到当年那场惊心动魄的品牌保卫战。 上世纪末，娃哈哈引进外资达能，合资公司并没有拿到娃哈哈的商标，而只拿到了许可使用权。也就是 说，娃哈哈的品牌还牢牢地掌握在娃哈哈集团手里。正因为如此，宗庆后才能在合资公司之外，建立一 系列由国有企业和职工持股的非合资公司，成功绕开外资控制，产品沿用娃哈哈商标，逐渐发展壮大； 也正因为如此，即便达能发起针对宗庆后和非合资公司的全面诉讼，最终也全面败诉。 这种"曲线救国"模式使娃哈哈品牌免遭吞噬，当然也埋下治理隐患。历史总是惊人地相似：宗庆后为保 品牌创建体外公司，这种体外运转的模式，在后来继续惯性分裂，甚至发展壮大，成为今天种种争议的 源头。比如，截至2022年底，国资控股的娃哈哈集团仅占整个"娃哈哈系"资产的15.67%，营业收入仅占 2.74%，净利润仅占0.39%，大量利润沉淀在与国资无关的渠道中。 但站在另一个维度，试想一下，如果没有这种体外运转的模式，娃哈哈能否 ...