Workflow
对等关税制度
icon
Search documents
对等关税命运难测:美上诉法院关键审判开启庭辩 法官质疑特朗普授权
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-07-31 22:06
Core Points - The fate of the reciprocal tariffs remains uncertain as a court case questions the legal basis for President Trump's significant tariff actions [1] - The case "VOS Selections v. Trump" is pivotal, with judges expressing skepticism about the authority granted to the president under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [1][3] - If the Trump administration loses the case, it may have to seek congressional authorization for its tariff strategy, which could significantly impact its trade agenda [1] Legal Context - The judges are particularly focused on the absence of the term "tariff" in the IEEPA, which mentions "foreign exchange, payments, and currency" [3] - The argument presented by the Department of Justice claims that Congress has granted the president the power to regulate imports during a national emergency, which includes imposing tariffs [4] Market Implications - If the Trump administration wins, it would gain substantial new powers to impose and relax tariffs on foreign entities, setting a precedent for future presidents [5] - Conversely, a loss could lead to a murky future for Trump's tariff policies, with potential international disputes arising from countries seeking to revoke agreements made under the current tariff regime [5]
特朗普据悉拟出台两步走关税计划,政府内部仍争论不休!
Jin Shi Shu Ju· 2025-03-25 13:20
Group 1 - The Trump administration is considering a two-step tariff strategy, which includes imposing emergency tariffs before completing investigations on trade partners [1][2] - The proposed plan aims to establish a solid legal framework for reciprocal tariffs while generating funds for Trump's planned tax cuts [1][2] - The administration is discussing the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act or a lesser-known provision of the 1930 Tariff Act, which could impose tariffs as high as 50% on trade partners [1][2] Group 2 - Trump has promised to announce new tariff policies on April 2, referred to as "Liberation Day," leading countries to lobby for exemptions [2][4] - The internal debate within the administration reflects differing views on the purpose of tariffs, with some officials focusing on revenue generation for tax cuts rather than using tariffs as negotiation tools [2][3] - The U.S. Trade Representative is increasingly taking on a legal planning role, advocating for investigations of trade partners before imposing tariffs, which may take up to six months [3] Group 3 - The White House is committed to creating a fair competitive environment for U.S. businesses and workers, with plans to advance the tariff strategy on April 2 [4] - The upcoming tariff policy is seen as an evolution of Trump's previous proposals to impose tariffs on U.S. exporters, which have been inconsistent and often reversed under corporate pressure [4] - Since taking office, Trump has imposed a uniform 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, with threats of retaliatory tariffs on French wine and other products following the EU's response to U.S. metal tariffs [4]