Core Viewpoint - The implementation of a duty performance checklist for street and town officials aims to alleviate their burdens and improve work efficiency, clarifying responsibilities and enhancing coordination with higher-level departments [12][15][28] Group 1: Background and Context - Since February 2024, a total of 38,000 towns and streets across the country have initiated the compilation of duty performance checklists, completing them by June of the same year [12] - Street and town officials have expressed feelings of increased workload due to numerous tasks assigned by higher authorities, often beyond their capabilities [1][4] Group 2: Challenges Faced by Local Officials - Local officials struggle with responsibilities such as waste management and safety inspections, which they feel are beyond their professional capacity [4][6] - The complexity of coordinating between various departments for tasks like safety checks and environmental regulations adds to their burden [6][9] Group 3: Implementation of Duty Performance Checklists - The duty performance checklist helps clarify what tasks are appropriate for street and town officials, what they should assist with, and what is beyond their capacity [13][15] - The checklist aims to delineate responsibilities between local officials and higher authorities, ensuring that tasks are assigned appropriately [15][18] Group 4: Impact on Local Governance - The checklist has led to improved efficiency in handling local issues, such as waste management and shared bicycle regulations, by allowing specialized departments to take on responsibilities previously assigned to local officials [20][25] - The establishment of these checklists has also streamlined the process of addressing community complaints, significantly reducing response times [25][26] Group 5: Future Directions - The government plans to continue refining the duty performance checklist system to further reduce burdens on local officials and enhance governance capabilities [28] - Recent regulations emphasize that responsibilities should not be arbitrarily assigned to local officials without proper authorization, reinforcing the importance of the checklist in maintaining clear lines of accountability [28]

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of a duty performance checklist for street and township offices aims to alleviate the burden on local officials and improve work efficiency by clearly defining responsibilities and tasks [10][12][26] Group 1: Background and Challenges - Local officials have been facing increasing workloads due to numerous tasks assigned by higher authorities, leading to significant pressure and challenges in fulfilling these responsibilities [5][7] - Many street and township offices lack the professional capacity to handle certain tasks, resulting in a reliance on volunteers and ad-hoc solutions [3][5] - The complexity of coordinating responsibilities among various departments has made it difficult for local officials to manage their duties effectively [5][10] Group 2: Implementation of Duty Performance Checklist - Since February 2024, a total of 38,000 street and township offices have developed duty performance checklists, which were completed by June 2024 [10][26] - The checklist process involves identifying what tasks are appropriate for local offices, what they should assist with, and what responsibilities should be handled by higher authorities [10][12] - The checklist aims to clarify the responsibilities of local offices and the corresponding duties of higher departments, thereby reducing confusion and inefficiency [12][14] Group 3: Outcomes and Benefits - The establishment of the checklist has led to improved coordination between local offices and higher authorities, allowing for more efficient handling of community issues [16][22] - Specific examples include the successful management of beach waste in Dalian and the regulation of shared bicycles in Shanghai, demonstrating the effectiveness of centralized coordination [16][20] - The checklist also facilitates a more focused approach to local governance, enabling officials to prioritize essential services and community needs [18][20] Group 4: Future Directions - The government plans to further refine the duty performance checklist system to ensure long-term effectiveness and support for local governance [24][26] - Recent regulations emphasize that responsibilities should not be arbitrarily transferred to local offices without proper authorization, reinforcing the need for clear delineation of duties [26]

Core Points - The article discusses the implementation of a duty list in Jiangsu Province to clarify responsibilities for grassroots officials, aiming to reduce their workload and enhance service to the community [1][2][3][4] - The initiative is part of a broader effort to streamline operations and improve efficiency in local governance, allowing officials to focus on essential tasks [2][3][4] Group 1: Implementation of Duty List - The duty list categorizes tasks into basic duties, cooperative duties, and tasks to be returned to higher authorities, helping officials understand their responsibilities better [2][3] - In Xuejia Town, the basic duties were reduced to 18 items, while 69 items were returned to higher authorities, significantly lightening the burden on local officials [2][3] Group 2: Impact on Local Governance - The new system has shifted the focus of local officials from merely responding to tasks to actively serving the community, improving their motivation and efficiency [3][4] - The initiative has led to a more organized approach in handling local issues, with the town's disciplinary committee monitoring the implementation of the duty list to ensure accountability [3][4] Group 3: Challenges and Adjustments - Despite the clarity provided by the duty list, issues such as departmental fragmentation and lack of communication still exist, requiring ongoing adjustments and supervision [3][4] - The local government is committed to addressing these challenges by enhancing inter-departmental coordination and ensuring that the duty list is effectively executed [4]