上下班途中受伤、居家办公期间遭遇伤害……近年来，这些场景是否算作工伤，屡屡引发争议。近日， 人力资源社会保障部发布了《关于执行〈工伤保险条例〉若干问题的意见(三)》(以下简称《意见 (三)》)，对此前工伤认定中的"模糊地带"作出明确的判断依据，既适配数字时代用工变革，也为参保人 筑牢权益保障网。 工伤保险是世界上最早建立的社会保险制度之一，也是世界上建立国家最多的社会保险险种。我国的 《工伤保险条例》于2004年开始施行，人社部分别在2013年、2016年发布了两份"执行意见"。目前，工 伤保险参保人数已达3.04亿人，每年有200多万职工获得保障。受行业领域差异、案件类型多样等因素 影响，工伤中的"三工"要素(工作时间、工作场所、工作原因)如何妥善认定，对维护职工和用人单位合 法权益均有重要意义。 在3亿多参保人中，农民工参保9000多万人，是预防工伤事故和职业病危害的重点保障人群。此前， 在"违法分包转包""个人挂靠"情形的工伤认定申请中，很多农民工的合法权益不能得到及时维护。尽管 有关规定已明确违法分包转包的用工单位、被挂靠单位应承担工伤保险责任，但部分地区仍以劳动关系 不明为由拒绝受理。《意见(三)》 ...

法官认为，本案中，颜某在工作中受到伤害，已被认定为工伤，苏州某人力公司作为工伤认定中的 用人单位，未在上述规定的30天时限内提交工伤认定申请，也未遇特殊情况申请延长，在此期间发生符 合本条例规定的工伤待遇等有关费用由人力公司负担，一审法院认定该公司支付颜某工伤申报之前发生 的医疗费用并无不当。 此外，法官认为，商业保险不能代替工伤保险，且两种保险所涉法律关系也不一致，上述人力公司 主张于本案中从颜某工伤保险待遇赔偿款项中扣除商业保险理赔款的请求并无法律依据，于是苏州中院 二审驳回上诉，维持原判。 法官说法 超龄劳动者是指超过国家法定退休年龄后，选择继续或再次工作的人员。随着人口老龄化程度加深 及我国就业结构变化，这类特殊群体的规模越来越大，相关权益保障面临新的难题。近日，江苏省苏州 市中级人民法院审结了一起劳动争议纠纷，依法判决支持了超龄劳动者因用人单位未及时申报工伤而产 生的5万余元待遇差额，明确了超龄劳动者在参保期间应享有同等工伤保险待遇，确保"银发"劳动者劳 有所依。 颜某与浙江一家外服企业签订劳动合同，从事导购工作，由苏州某人力公司为颜某缴纳社会保险。 2024年1月，颜某在工作中受伤，当时已56周岁 ...

Group 1 - The core issue in the administrative penalty case was the appropriateness of the fine amount imposed on the company for exceeding pollution discharge limits due to a malfunctioning leachate treatment system [1] - The original fine of 107,000 yuan was deemed excessive after considering the duration of the violation, the company's proactive remediation efforts, and the social harm caused, leading to a reduction of the fine to 50,000 yuan [1] - This case is part of a recent release by the Ministry of Justice, which includes five typical cases demonstrating the efficiency of administrative review in supervising administrative actions and promoting fair enforcement [1] Group 2 - The administrative review process allows for direct new administrative actions when facts are unclear or evidence is insufficient, reducing the burden on applicants [2] - An example case involved a worker's compensation claim where the administrative review body determined that the applicant was indeed on a reasonable route for work-related injury, thus facilitating timely relief for the injured party [2]

Group 1 - The Ministry of Justice released five typical cases to implement the newly revised Administrative Review Law, highlighting the role of administrative review in supervising administrative actions effectively [1] - In a case involving a company contesting an administrative penalty from an environmental agency, the review body adjusted the penalty to align with the principles of tolerance and education, indicating a shift towards more reasonable enforcement [1] - Administrative agencies must base their actions on accurate facts and appropriate legal frameworks, as demonstrated in a case where a housing authority failed to apply the correct legal basis, leading to a correction by the review body [1] Group 2 - The necessity of basing administrative actions and reviews on factual evidence and legal standards is emphasized, as seen in a case where a labor bureau denied a worker's injury claim, which was later overturned by the review body [2] - The review body recognized the worker's situation as a work-related injury, ensuring timely relief and demonstrating the effectiveness of the workers' compensation system [2]