Group 1 - The core issue in the administrative penalty case was the appropriateness of the fine amount imposed on the company for exceeding pollution discharge limits due to a malfunctioning leachate treatment system [1] - The original fine of 107,000 yuan was deemed excessive after considering the duration of the violation, the company's proactive remediation efforts, and the social harm caused, leading to a reduction of the fine to 50,000 yuan [1] - This case is part of a recent release by the Ministry of Justice, which includes five typical cases demonstrating the efficiency of administrative review in supervising administrative actions and promoting fair enforcement [1] Group 2 - The administrative review process allows for direct new administrative actions when facts are unclear or evidence is insufficient, reducing the burden on applicants [2] - An example case involved a worker's compensation claim where the administrative review body determined that the applicant was indeed on a reasonable route for work-related injury, thus facilitating timely relief for the injured party [2]

Group 1 - The Ministry of Justice released five typical cases to implement the newly revised Administrative Review Law, highlighting the role of administrative review in supervising administrative actions effectively [1] - In a case involving a company contesting an administrative penalty from an environmental agency, the review body adjusted the penalty to align with the principles of tolerance and education, indicating a shift towards more reasonable enforcement [1] - Administrative agencies must base their actions on accurate facts and appropriate legal frameworks, as demonstrated in a case where a housing authority failed to apply the correct legal basis, leading to a correction by the review body [1] Group 2 - The necessity of basing administrative actions and reviews on factual evidence and legal standards is emphasized, as seen in a case where a labor bureau denied a worker's injury claim, which was later overturned by the review body [2] - The review body recognized the worker's situation as a work-related injury, ensuring timely relief and demonstrating the effectiveness of the workers' compensation system [2]