据法新社12月21日报道，以色列安全内阁批准在被占领的约旦河西岸新建19个定居点。该国极右翼财政 部长21日表示，此举旨在阻止巴勒斯坦建国。 根据以财政部长比撒列·斯莫特里赫办公室的一份声明，这一决定使过去三年获批的定居点总数达到69 个。 声明称："财政部长比撒列·斯莫特里赫和国防部长伊斯雷尔·卡茨提出的在朱迪亚－撒马利亚区宣布并正 式设立19个新定居点的提案已获内阁批准。" 斯莫特里赫是定居点扩张的积极倡导者，他本人也是一名定居者。他在声明中说："我们正在切实阻止 巴勒斯坦国家的建立。"（参考消息） 就在几天前，联合国指出，以色列在约旦河西岸的定居点扩张已达到至少自2017年以来的最高水平，所 有这些定居点均被国际法认定为非法。 ...

埃及总统府当天发表声明说，两国领导人就加沙地带最新局势交换了意见，双方一致认为，各方应致力 于推动启动全面政治进程，建立一个以1967年边界为基础、以东耶路撒冷为首都、拥有独立主权的巴勒 斯坦国。 埃及总统塞西12日同法国总统马克龙通电话，双方重申支持建立独立的巴勒斯坦国。 自加沙停火第一阶段协议10月生效以来，以色列与巴勒斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动（哈马斯）冲突不断，互指 对方违反停火协议。以色列方面无限期推迟开放位于加沙地带南部与埃及交界处、对人道援助至关重要 的拉法口岸。以方12月3日发表声明称，将在几天内重新开放拉法口岸，但仅限单向通行，允许巴勒斯 坦人离开加沙前往埃及。 （文章来源：新华社） 塞西强调，各方应共同维护停火协议，当务之急是保障人道主义援助物资顺利进入加沙地带，并立即着 手开展地区重建工作。他重申埃及坚决反对以色列一切侵犯行为，呼吁国际社会加大施压以制止以色列 相关行动。 声明还说，马克龙高度赞赏埃及为维护地区稳定、特别是为巩固加沙停火所作出的努力。 ...

默茨在记者会上重申德国对以色列的支持，但同时表示，德方对巴勒斯坦建国"持开放态度"，同时 反对以方吞并约旦河西岸。 默茨6日开始对以色列进行为期两天的访问，这是他今年5月就任德国总理以来首次访以。 新华社耶路撒冷12月7日电（记者 路一凡 王卓伦）以色列总理内塔尼亚胡7日与到访的德国总理默 茨会晤后说，加沙停火预计将"很快"进入第二阶段。 内塔尼亚胡在会晤结束后举行的记者会上说，加沙停火第一阶段即将结束，预计将"很快"进入第二 阶段。他将于本月晚些时候与美国总统特朗普会面，讨论如何结束巴勒斯坦伊斯兰抵抗运动（哈马 斯）"在加沙地带的统治"。 ...

Core Insights - The meeting between President Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman revealed significant tensions regarding policy differences, particularly concerning the Abraham Accords and the Palestinian two-state solution [2][3] - Trump expressed frustration over bin Salman's refusal to formally join the Abraham Accords, emphasizing the need for Saudi Arabia's commitment to the Palestinian cause as a prerequisite for participation [2] - The discussions highlighted the impact of public sentiment in Saudi Arabia against Israel, especially following the recent Gaza conflict, which complicates the normalization of relations [2][3] Group 1 - The atmosphere during the private discussions between Trump and bin Salman was described as tense, with major disagreements on policy [2] - Bin Salman insisted that Saudi Arabia would only join the Abraham Accords if there was a credible and time-bound commitment to a two-state solution for Palestinians [2] - Trump reportedly exerted significant pressure on bin Salman to join the accords, leading to feelings of disappointment and frustration from the U.S. side [2] Group 2 - There are speculations that the October 7 attack by Hamas was motivated by fears that the Palestinian statehood issue would be sidelined as more Arab nations joined the Abraham Accords [3] - The attack has been interpreted as a strategic move to deepen divisions between the Arab world and Israel, potentially stalling the progress of the Abraham Accords [3] - The geopolitical landscape has shifted, with Iran and Hezbollah appearing weaker, while the Syrian government has been significantly impacted, affecting the dynamics of resistance against Israeli expansion [3]

Core Viewpoint - Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman emphasized that establishing diplomatic relations with Israel is contingent upon a "clear path" to Palestinian statehood [1] Group 1: Defense Cooperation - The U.S. and Saudi Arabia have reached an agreement on defense cooperation, with Saudi Arabia set to purchase F-35 stealth fighter jets similar to those used by Israel [1] Group 2: Investment and Technology - Saudi Arabia plans to increase its investment in the U.S. to $1 trillion, highlighting a significant demand for computing power and a desire to acquire advanced chips manufactured in the U.S. [1] - A high-profile investment summit between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia is scheduled to take place in Washington on the 19th [1]

Core Points - The UN Security Council passed Resolution 2803, endorsing the US's "20-point plan" to end the Gaza conflict, which includes the establishment of a Peace Council as a transitional governing body for Gaza and the authorization of an international stabilization force [1][3] - The resolution received support from 13 out of 15 Security Council members, with Russia and China abstaining [3][9] - The resolution aims to ensure the demilitarization of Gaza, protect civilians, and facilitate humanitarian corridors, but lacks a clear timeline for Palestinian statehood [6][7] Group 1 - The resolution is seen as a key step in legitimizing the transitional governing body and alleviating concerns for countries considering troop deployment to Gaza [1][3] - The US President Trump described the vote as a historic moment that would bring more peace to the world [3] - The Palestinian Authority welcomed the resolution but emphasized the need for urgent implementation of its terms [3][6] Group 2 - Hamas opposed the resolution, claiming it imposes an international guardianship mechanism on Gaza and reiterating its stance against disarmament [3][8] - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu expressed support for the resolution but maintained opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state [4][5] - The resolution's vague wording on Palestinian statehood has led to ongoing uncertainty regarding its implications [7][9] Group 3 - The resolution's approval followed nearly two weeks of negotiations, during which Arab nations and Palestinian representatives pressured the US to strengthen references to Palestinian self-determination [6][7] - The lack of specific details in the resolution raises concerns about its implementation and the sustainability of the current ceasefire [7][9] - The international stabilization force's role in disarming Hamas remains a significant challenge, with potential troop-contributing countries expressing varying levels of willingness to engage [7][9]

Core Points - The UN Security Council approved a resolution related to Gaza proposed by the United States with 13 votes in favor, 0 against, and 2 abstentions, with China and Russia abstaining [1] - The resolution includes maintaining a ceasefire in Gaza, restoring humanitarian aid, and promoting reconstruction and economic recovery in the region [1] - An institution will be established to oversee the Palestinian Authority's reform plans, creating conditions for Palestinian self-determination and statehood [1] - The Palestinian government welcomed the resolution and confirmed its readiness for full implementation, while Hamas strongly criticized it [1]

Core Points - The UN Security Council approved a resolution drafted by the US, endorsing President Trump's plan to end the Gaza conflict and authorizing the deployment of international stabilization forces [1][2] - The resolution is seen as legitimizing a transitional governance body and aims to facilitate the reconstruction and economic recovery of Gaza [1] - Hamas has stated it will not disarm and views its actions against Israel as legitimate resistance, potentially leading to conflict with the authorized international forces [1] Group 1 - The resolution includes Trump's "20-point plan" as an attachment, which is seen as a potential pathway for Palestinian self-determination [2] - The resolution aims to break Hamas's control and ensure Gaza's prosperity and security [2] - Russia and China abstained from voting, allowing the resolution to pass [2] Group 2 - The resolution mentions the possibility of Palestinian statehood contingent on reforms by the Palestinian Authority and progress in Gaza's reconstruction [3] - The US will promote dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to reach a consensus on a peaceful coexistence [3] - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu reiterated opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state under pressure from right-wing members of his government [3]

Core Points - The UN Security Council is set to vote on a resolution regarding the Gaza Strip, supported by the US and several Islamic countries, which includes a "20-point plan" for a ceasefire and the establishment of a transitional governance body and international forces in Gaza [1] - There are significant disagreements between the US and Israel regarding the plan, particularly concerning the disarmament of Hamas and the establishment of a Palestinian state [1] - Hamas has publicly rejected the proposed resolution, viewing it as an infringement on Palestinian sovereignty and a biased governance scheme favoring Israel [2] Group 1 - The resolution aims to authorize the establishment of a transitional governance body and international stability forces in Gaza [1] - The Israeli government, led by Prime Minister Netanyahu, opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state and insists on the disarmament of Hamas [1] - Hamas has condemned the resolution, asserting it undermines stability in Gaza and infringes on Palestinian rights [2] Group 2 - The US is considering abandoning the demand for Hamas's disarmament in favor of focusing on Gaza's reconstruction, which has caused dissatisfaction among Israeli officials [1] - Netanyahu's administration has consistently maintained its stance against the creation of a Palestinian state in any territory west of the Jordan River [1] - The main obstacle to advancing the peace plan and achieving diplomatic breakthroughs is identified as Netanyahu's position [2]

Core Viewpoint - Hamas issued a memorandum warning against the dangers of a U.S. proposal regarding Gaza, which they believe favors Israel and undermines Palestinian sovereignty [1][2] Group 1: U.S. Proposal and Reactions - The memorandum from Palestinian factions criticizes the U.S. proposal for attempting to impose international governance on Gaza, which includes establishing an international security force and transferring management to a supranational entity [1] - Hamas spokesperson stated that the U.S. proposal does not contribute to stability in Gaza and would replace Israeli occupation with another form of control [2] Group 2: Israeli Position - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu reiterated opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state and emphasized the need for the demilitarization of Gaza and disarmament of Hamas [3] - Israeli Defense Minister Katz mentioned that operations to destroy tunnels in Gaza are progressing well, and the anticipated international security force will be responsible for disarming Hamas [3] Group 3: Palestinian Governance and Rights - The memorandum asserts that any humanitarian aid must be implemented through Palestinian institutions under international supervision to respect Palestinian sovereignty and avoid politicization [1] - It opposes any clauses that would involve disarming Gaza or infringe upon the rights of the Palestinian people to resist, stating that discussions on disarmament should be internal matters linked to ending Israeli occupation and establishing a Palestinian state [1]