Workflow
房屋质量问题
icon
Search documents
比房价上涨更让购房者担心的是,房屋质量问题频现,购房者能否逃脱?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-13 18:42
Core Insights - The article highlights the increasing concern among homebuyers regarding housing quality issues, surpassing concerns about price fluctuations [1] - A significant percentage of new homeowners, over 68%, reported discovering various quality problems upon receiving their properties, marking a 12% increase from the previous year [1] Group 1: Common Housing Quality Issues - The most common housing quality issues include water leakage (32.7% of complaints), wall cracks (21.5%), uneven flooring (12.8%), and poor sealing of doors and windows (9.6%) [3][4] - Other notable issues include blocked or leaking pipes (8.2%), unsafe electrical designs (5.4%), and discrepancies between actual and contractual areas (2.8%) [4] Group 2: Homebuyer Rights and Remedies - Homebuyers can resolve quality issues through direct negotiation with developers, which successfully resolves about 45% of disputes [4][8] - If negotiations fail, buyers can seek mediation through property management or relevant authorities, with a success rate of approximately 30% [8] - Complaints can also be filed with consumer associations, which have a 65% success rate in resolving property-related complaints [9] - Legal action is a last resort, with a 72.3% success rate for homebuyers in court cases related to housing quality disputes [11] Group 3: Preventive Measures for Homebuyers - Selecting a reputable developer is crucial, as about 15% of developers are under scrutiny for quality issues [13] - Careful review of contracts is essential, ensuring clarity on quality standards, warranty terms, and dispute resolution processes [14] - Conducting thorough inspections during the handover process can help identify issues early, as 35% of buyers skip this critical step [15] - Following up on remediation efforts is vital, as 25% of buyers do not persistently track the resolution of reported issues [16][17] - Homebuyers may also consider purchasing quality insurance, which has a compensation success rate of 83% [18]
上海知名豪宅强制补缴近百万元“面积差价”,业主拒绝收房,称“开发商擅自违规变更设计规划”
Hua Xia Shi Bao· 2025-07-26 04:00
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights significant disputes between homeowners and the developer of the Haide No. 1 project in Shanghai, focusing on unauthorized design changes, discrepancies in measured and predicted areas, and various quality issues leading to homeowners refusing to accept their properties [2][3][4]. Group 1: Project Background - The Haide No. 1 project was originally developed by Gree Real Estate Co., which has since been rebranded as Zhuhai Huafa Group after transferring its real estate business [2][3]. - The project launched 163 units in February 2023 with an average price of 129,800 yuan per square meter and a subscription rate of 392% [3]. Group 2: Discrepancies in Area Measurements - Homeowners reported being forced to pay significant fees due to discrepancies between actual and predicted areas, with some facing additional charges of up to 600,000 yuan [4][5]. - The discrepancies were attributed to changes in the building's external outline and internal wall thickness, leading to an increase in measured areas [4][5]. Group 3: Quality and Compliance Issues - Homeowners expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of construction, citing issues such as rough interior finishes and design flaws that hinder functionality [7][10]. - The project reportedly failed to meet contractual agreements regarding public area standards and overall quality, further solidifying homeowners' refusal to accept the properties [7][12]. Group 4: Developer's Response - The developer, Shanghai Haikong Baolian Real Estate Co., claimed that the project adhered to all relevant regulations and standards throughout its design and construction [15][16]. - Despite ongoing communication, many key issues remain unresolved, and the developer has been criticized for a lack of genuine engagement with homeowners [16][17]. Group 5: Legal Actions and Future Steps - Some homeowners are considering legal action due to the developer's alleged breaches of contract and quality issues, with suggestions to pursue civil lawsuits or file complaints with relevant authorities [17].