11月18日，墨西哥墨西哥城，墨总统辛鲍姆表示不允许美国在墨领土打击贩毒集团，称墨方会对贩毒集 团采取行动。辛鲍姆警告称美国19世纪干预墨西哥时占领了墨西哥一半领土。17日美国总统特朗普表示 美国政府正在"严密监控"来自墨西哥的毒品走私通道，并表示为了打击毒品犯罪"什么都愿意做"。对此 辛鲍姆表示愿利用美方提供的情报打击贩毒集团，但不允许美军在墨领土行动。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the recent military actions taken by the U.S. against alleged drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean, resulting in casualties and international criticism [1][2][3] - U.S. Defense Secretary Hegseth announced the strike on a vessel involved in drug smuggling, leading to the death of three individuals [1] - Since September, over 10 vessels have been sunk and more than 60 alleged drug traffickers have been killed in similar operations [2] Group 2 - The United Nations has urged the U.S. to cease its military actions in the Caribbean and Pacific, labeling the strikes as extrajudicial killings without legal justification [3] - The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights emphasized the need for an independent investigation into these incidents [3] - There is ongoing political contention in the U.S. regarding the legality of these military actions, with some lawmakers accusing the Trump administration of overstepping its authority [2]

最新：特朗普证实已授权中情局在委内瑞拉开展行动 中新网10月16日电 据美国全国广播公司(NBC)、《纽约时报》报道，当地时间15日，美国总统特朗普表 示，美方确定将考虑开展陆地行动对贩毒集团进行地面打击，并证实已授权中情局在委内瑞拉开展行 动。 据报道，一名记者在白宫问特朗普："你为什么授权中央情报局进入委内瑞拉？" "我授权有两个原因，"特朗普回答。"第一，他们把监狱里的囚犯都转移到美国去了。"特朗普补充说， 另一个原因是毒品贩运。"我们(美国)有很多毒品来自委内瑞拉，"特朗普说。 目前，中情局拒绝对此发表评论。 早些时候，据美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)报道，特朗普14日表示，美国军方在委内瑞拉海岸附近的国际 水域再次击沉一艘"贩毒船"，造成船上6人死亡。 特朗普称，情报证实，事发时被击沉船只在委内瑞拉海岸附近"贩运毒品"，并与"非法毒品恐怖主义网 络"有联系。特朗普称该船"隶属于指定恐怖组织"，但没有指出任何组织的名字，也没有提供证据支持 这一说法。 报道称，这至少是美国第五次宣布此类袭击。此次袭击可能进一步加剧美国与委内瑞拉之间的紧张关 系。 编辑：董文博 近期，美国以"打击贩毒集团"为由在委内瑞拉附 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military actions taken by the Trump administration against drug trafficking boats off the coast of Venezuela, highlighting the escalation of U.S. military presence in Latin America and the implications of these actions on international relations and domestic politics [2][3][4][6]. Group 1: Military Actions - On October 14, the U.S. military sank another drug trafficking boat near the coast of Venezuela, marking the fifth such action since September, with a total of five boats destroyed and 27 alleged drug traffickers killed [2][3]. - The Trump administration claims that the targeted boats were involved in drug trafficking and linked to "illegal drug terrorism networks," although specific affiliations to drug cartels were not disclosed [3]. Group 2: U.S. Military Strategy - The U.S. Department of Defense announced the formation of a "Drug Interdiction Task Force" under the Southern Command to oversee military operations in Latin America, emphasizing a proactive approach to combat drug trafficking [5]. - The task force will be led by the Marine Corps' Second Expeditionary Brigade, which is equipped for rapid overseas deployment and aims to enhance anti-drug efforts in the Western Hemisphere [5]. Group 3: Political Reactions - The Trump administration's military actions have faced criticism from several Democratic lawmakers, who argue that the use of military force against drug cartels lacks credible legal justification and evidence [3]. - Venezuelan representatives have condemned the U.S. actions as "illegal killings," asserting that they do not constitute self-defense [5].

委内瑞拉总统马杜罗多次指责美国意图通过军事威胁在委搞政权更迭，并在拉美进行军事扩张。 责编：卢思宇、姚凯红 特朗普在帖文中称，情报证实，事发时被击沉船只在委内瑞拉海岸附近贩运毒品，并与"非法毒品恐怖 主义网络"有联系。他将死者称为"毒品恐怖分子"，但未说明他们属于哪个贩毒集团。 本月初，特朗普政府向国会递交备忘录，称美国与被美认定为恐怖组织的贩毒集团"正处于非国际武装 冲突之中"。备忘录未具体说明涉及哪些贩毒集团，也未说明如何将个人目标认定为贩毒集团成员。多 名美国国会民主党人指责特朗普政府使用军队打击贩毒集团是滥用权力，且未提供"任何可信的法律依 据、证据或情报"。 新华社华盛顿10月14日电（记者徐剑梅）美国总统特朗普14日在社交媒体发文说，美国军方当天在委内 瑞拉海岸附近的国际水域再次击沉一艘"贩毒船"，船上6人死亡。 这是9月以来，特朗普政府第五次宣布在委内瑞拉外海国际水域针对"贩毒船"采取军事行动，迄今宣称 摧毁5艘所谓"运毒船"并打死27名"毒贩"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela, particularly in light of recent military actions by the U.S. against drug trafficking vessels originating from Venezuela, which has drawn criticism from Russia for threatening regional security [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - On September 2, the U.S. military attacked a drug trafficking vessel from Venezuela, resulting in the deaths of 11 individuals [1]. - The U.S. has deployed multiple warships in the Caribbean near Venezuela under the pretext of combating drug trafficking, which has heightened tensions between the two nations [3]. Group 2: Russian Response - Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova accused the U.S. of openly pressuring Venezuela and stated that the situation is being exaggerated, creating a threat to regional security [3]. - Zakharova emphasized that the actions of the West against countries pursuing independent policies are absolutely unacceptable [1][3]. Group 3: Venezuelan Government's Position - Venezuelan President Maduro condemned the U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, claiming it is an extreme pressure tactic aimed at overthrowing the Venezuelan government, while asserting that Venezuela is committed to combating drug trafficking [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the U.S. government is escalating its military actions against drug trafficking organizations, indicating a significant shift in strategy by opting for direct military strikes rather than interception [1][3]. - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio stated that intercepting drug boats has proven ineffective, as drug cartels are willing to accept a 2% loss of their cargo, thus advocating for the destruction of these vessels instead [3]. - The recent military strike against a suspected drug trafficking vessel linked to the Venezuelan gang "Aragua Train" resulted in the death of 11 members, marking an unprecedented level of military engagement in drug enforcement [4]. Group 2 - The U.S. has deployed multiple naval vessels in the Caribbean near Venezuela under the pretext of combating drug trafficking, which has heightened tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela [3][4]. - Venezuelan President Maduro criticized the U.S. military presence, claiming it is an absurd attempt to exert extreme pressure on Venezuela under the guise of drug enforcement, while asserting that Venezuela is committed to fighting drug trafficking [4].

Core Viewpoint - The situation in Venezuela is escalating due to the U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, which President Maduro perceives as a significant threat to national sovereignty and security [2][3]. Military Deployment - Maduro claims that eight U.S. Navy ships, armed with 1,200 missiles, are currently positioned near Venezuela, marking the largest threat seen in the continent in a century [2]. - The U.S. has deployed two Aegis destroyers and additional naval vessels in the region, with plans to further increase military presence, including three amphibious assault ships and over 4,000 sailors and Marines [2][3]. Drug Trafficking Allegations - The U.S. government is intensifying its naval forces to combat drug trafficking from Latin American cartels, with Maduro being accused of leading a drug trafficking organization [3]. - Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil argues that the narrative of Venezuela as a primary route for cocaine trafficking is misleading, as 87% of Colombian cocaine exits through the Pacific, with only about 5% attempting to pass through Venezuela [3]. Political Context - Maduro's government faces accusations of electoral fraud, leading to a lack of recognition from the U.S. regarding his presidency [4]. - The opposition in Venezuela has been urging the U.S. and other nations to apply pressure on Maduro, with some leaders expressing support for U.S. military actions against his government [4]. International Relations - Maduro has indicated that his government maintains communication channels with the Trump administration, while also condemning the military deployment as a threat to a sovereign nation [4][5]. - He warns that any military action by the U.S. would result in significant consequences for the Trump administration, labeling it as a failed policy of regime change [5].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has ordered an amphibious task force to the South Caribbean to support President Trump's efforts against Latin American drug trafficking organizations [1] Group 1: Military Deployment - Three ships, "San Antonio," "Iwo Jima," and "Fort Lauderdale," will carry approximately 4,500 U.S. military personnel, including 2,200 Marines, expected to arrive near Venezuela by the 24th [1] - The specific mission details have not been disclosed, but the deployment targets groups classified as "transnational drug terrorist organizations" [1] Group 2: Drug Trafficking Strategy - The Trump administration has designated the Sinaloa drug cartel in Mexico and Venezuela's "Aragua Train" gang as global terrorist organizations since February [1] - The fight against drug trafficking is viewed as a crucial part of immigration control and southern border security strategy [1] Group 3: Official Confirmation - On August 19, the White House spokesperson confirmed the deployment of three ships carrying 4,000 soldiers to the Caribbean waters near Venezuela [1]

Core Points - The article discusses a secret executive order signed by President Trump authorizing military actions against drug cartels in Latin America, including Mexico [1][3] - Mexican President AMLO firmly stated that the U.S. will not send troops to Mexico, emphasizing that any military intervention is unacceptable [1][3] - The Mexican Foreign Ministry reiterated its stance against U.S. military involvement in Mexico, highlighting the importance of national sovereignty and cooperation based on mutual respect [3] Summary by Sections - **U.S. Actions**: The executive order provides a basis for military actions against drug cartels on foreign territories, marking a significant escalation in Trump's approach to combating drug trafficking [1][3] - **Mexican Response**: President AMLO and the Mexican Foreign Ministry have clearly rejected the idea of U.S. military presence, asserting that Mexico will handle its own security issues [3] - **Characterization of Drug Cartels**: U.S. Secretary of State Rubio has classified drug cartels as armed terrorist organizations, suggesting a shift in how the U.S. perceives and plans to address these groups [3]