据了解，自2024年启动"贵法智库丛书"编撰以来，省高院联合人民法院出版社，组织全省法院精干力 量，围绕司法实践中的重点难点问题开展系统调研、反复论证，历经两年形成首批研究成果。丛书由 《执源治理实践与探索》《数字法院建设实践与展望》和"贵州法院类案审判要件指南"三大板块组成， 注重理论与实践结合，突出问题导向和实践指向。 其中，《执源治理实践与探索》聚焦"有效解决执行难"，系统梳理贵州在全国率先探索执源治理的制度 创新；《数字法院建设实践与展望》围绕司法数字化转型，探讨大数据、人工智能等新技术在司法领域 的应用场景，总结电子卷宗"单套制"、政法协同办案等创新实践；"贵州法院类案审判要件指南"聚焦常 见罪名与案由，已于2025年完成20项，并将按三年规划分批次出版，旨在为一线法官提供精准实用的裁 判指引。 近年来，贵州法院系统将"公正与效率"贯穿工作全过程，深入实施"一体两翼三大工程"，审判质量指标 连续两年全面达标，服判息诉率保持在98.55%的高位。此次丛书出版，是对相关创新实践的系统梳理 和集中呈现。 转自：贵州日报 本报讯（记者 陈景雄 实习生 王子乐）1月20日，贵州省高级人民法院召开"贵法智库丛书 ...

在全面开展交叉执行工作的同时，吉林法院还坚持把"抓前端、治未病"落到实处，由内及外多措并举推 动执源治理，加大财产保全力度，健全完善执前调解工作机制，坚持调解成功与履行到位一体推进，构 建判后督促履行制度，切实解决"只管判不管执"问题。 在推进"终本清仓"过程中，吉林法院严格管理全省终结本次执行程序案件，将有限的司法资源集中于办 理有财产案件。在探索"执破衔接"过程中，吉林法院在化解执行积案的同时，更加强调市场主体的甄别 退出与市场要素的再流动。对于确无救治可能的企业，依法高效进行破产清算，及时出清大批"僵尸企 业"；对于一些有潜力、有前景的企业，通过破产重整、破产和解等方式帮助企业化解危机，尤其是在 处理关联案件与债权人众多、破解烂尾楼难题以及保障房屋买受人合法权益等方面，吉林执行实践进行 了有益尝试并取得了较为成型的经验。 据介绍，吉林省高院执行局聚焦"关联性强、信访集中、长期未结"三类重点案件，通过系统筛查、基层 上报、信访倒查等方式初筛，创新实施"三类清单"分类管理，同步建立承接反馈与进度跟踪机制，形 成"指令—承接—推进—反馈"全链条闭环，确保交叉执行高效协同、落地见效。 （来源：工人日报） 本报讯 ...

Core Viewpoint - The execution process in judicial cases is crucial for achieving fairness and justice, and the execution tribunal plays a key role in resolving disputes and protecting the legal rights of the public [1] Group 1: Execution Case Statistics - From 2022 to the first half of 2025, the Chongchuan Court accepted a total of 817 execution objection cases and 210 execution objection lawsuits, with 822 execution objection cases and 182 execution objection lawsuits concluded [3] - The annual case acceptance numbers show an overall declining trend, indicating the effectiveness of the court's governance work [3] Group 2: Case Structure and Challenges - Disputes in cases are primarily concentrated on issues such as "discrepancy between name and reality" of property rights and conflicts of multiple rights, with the highest proportion of cases involving third parties claiming ownership to exclude execution [3] - New types of objections, such as residential rights and leasing rights, are gradually emerging [3] Group 3: Innovative Mechanisms - To address challenges in execution adjudication, the Chongchuan Court has implemented innovative mechanisms, including the responsibility system and case review mechanism, enhancing business learning to improve the quality and efficiency of execution adjudication [3] - The court has established a pre-examination mechanism for execution disputes to promote substantive resolution of objections and prevent abuse of objections through a warning mechanism [3] Group 4: Judicial Principles and Case Examples - The execution adjudication work emphasizes the principle of good faith and civilized execution, prioritizing the review of cases involving survival rights and promptly lifting improper execution measures [4] - A typical case involved the court supporting the rental rights of two employees living in a property seized during execution, highlighting the need to respect historical welfare housing rights [4] Group 5: Future Directions - The Chongchuan Court plans to continue deepening reforms in execution adjudication mechanisms to address execution difficulties and contribute to the protection of legal rights and the optimization of the legal business environment [4]