Workflow
执破衔接
icon
Search documents
司法护航信用经济建设
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-07 22:52
2025年新纳入失信名单233.98万人次,同时有266.96万人次通过信用修复回归市场。日前,最高人民法院公布 有效解决执行难工作情况。据介绍,以交叉执行为牵引,人民法院的执行质效持续高位运行,执行规范化建 设成效不断显现,着力保障当事人合法权益依法"兑现"。 "信用修复人次连续7个季度超过新纳入失信名单人次,累计1865.18万被执行人迫于失信惩戒压力主动履行义 务。"最高人民法院执行局局长黄文俊表示,人民法院坚持失信惩戒精准化与信用修复常态化,以失信"失 能"分级分类助力信用经济建设。 2025年6月,最高人民法院联合最高人民检察院、公安部出台《关于办理拒不执行判决、裁定刑事案件若干问 题的意见》,严厉打击恶意规避执行、逃避执行的拒执行为。2025年,共计4461人被依法追究拒不执行判 决、裁定罪,显示出司法部门对失信行为保持高压态势。 数据显示,2025年,民事裁判自动履行率61.01%,同比增长2.7个百分点。在执行案件量同比增长15.43%的情 况下,执行到位率达到50.59%,执行完毕率39.29%。执行到位金额约2.2万亿元,连续3年超过2万亿元。 黄文俊介绍,人民法院重点聚焦"骨头案""信访 ...
退渔还耕,2.45万亩盐碱地如何变良田?
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-03 21:52
(来源:新华日报) 海事法院凝聚交叉执行合力,在盐城弶港滩涂现场挂图作战,稳慎推进662张虾棚有序拆除,妥善化解 涉养殖户纠纷。 俞经旻 摄 站在盐城弶港沿海这片滩涂上,执行法官们极目远望,成方连片的高标准农田呈现眼前。农田上麦苗露 出新绿,空气中弥漫着泥土与新苗的芬芳。 就在一年前,这里还是一片片坑坑洼洼的虾塘,养殖户们拒不腾退,亟待推进的盐碱地复垦整治项目阻 碍重重…… 662张拒拆的虾棚 冲突一触即发 上世纪90年代末,省属国企仓某公司在弶港沿海滩涂进行开发,形成约2.45万亩盐碱地。其后部分滩涂 盐碱地陆续发包给养殖户从事鱼虾等水产养殖。 为保障国家粮食安全,贯彻落实高标准农田建设的政策要求,"十四五"期间,弶港仓东片区这块2.45万 亩的滩涂盐碱地需要"退渔还耕",作为全省宜耕后备资源。 "集团把任务交给我们。今年是'十四五'收官之年,任务完成迫在眉睫。前期推进很顺利,没想到最后 卡在养殖户未依约返还的这443亩滩涂上,阻力很大,困难重重。"2025年10月,仓某公司总经理成小锋 回顾该案时说。 根据生效法律文书,养殖户赵某(化名)应向仓某公司交还滩涂443亩,但赵某未依约返还。2024年2 月,仓 ...
“执破衔接”助上市民企160亿元债务100%清偿
中经记者 封莉 北京报道 据了解,除已申请强制执行的债权人外,该公司还拖欠1600余名职工、3800余家材料供应商、4万多名 劳务工债务,公司股价下跌,面临退市风险,2万余名中小股东合法权益受损。 深圳中院在执行中发现,某集团曾是国内装饰装修行业的著名企业,具备较高的品牌价值,有机会通过 破产重整制度重获生机,遂启动"执破衔接"机制。 经批准,深圳中院裁定受理债权人对某集团的重整申请。之后,某集团重整计划草案经债权人会议及出 资人会议表决通过并获深圳中院裁定批准。 在重整计划执行中,某集团面临着极短的"摘星脱帽"窗口期,但其财产被多家法院查封,如果不及时解 封,公司将面临无法顺利"摘星脱帽",甚至导致退市,无法执行重整计划的风险。 通过执行与破产全方位衔接,实现僵尸企业"移得出"、危困企业"治得早"。 封莉/摄影 2026年1月26日,《中国经营报》记者从最高人民法院(以下简称"最高法")获悉,2025年,人民法院 全力开展"终本出清"活动,累计963.82万件终本案件通过执破衔接、恢复执行、被执行人自动履行等退 出终本程序。此外,移送破产案件4.84万件,1.58万家企业实现"出清"。通过执行与破产全方位衔 ...
法院多措并举解决执行难
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-28 19:57
在全面开展交叉执行工作的同时,吉林法院还坚持把"抓前端、治未病"落到实处,由内及外多措并举推 动执源治理,加大财产保全力度,健全完善执前调解工作机制,坚持调解成功与履行到位一体推进,构 建判后督促履行制度,切实解决"只管判不管执"问题。 在推进"终本清仓"过程中,吉林法院严格管理全省终结本次执行程序案件,将有限的司法资源集中于办 理有财产案件。在探索"执破衔接"过程中,吉林法院在化解执行积案的同时,更加强调市场主体的甄别 退出与市场要素的再流动。对于确无救治可能的企业,依法高效进行破产清算,及时出清大批"僵尸企 业";对于一些有潜力、有前景的企业,通过破产重整、破产和解等方式帮助企业化解危机,尤其是在 处理关联案件与债权人众多、破解烂尾楼难题以及保障房屋买受人合法权益等方面,吉林执行实践进行 了有益尝试并取得了较为成型的经验。 据介绍,吉林省高院执行局聚焦"关联性强、信访集中、长期未结"三类重点案件,通过系统筛查、基层 上报、信访倒查等方式初筛,创新实施"三类清单"分类管理,同步建立承接反馈与进度跟踪机制,形 成"指令—承接—推进—反馈"全链条闭环,确保交叉执行高效协同、落地见效。 (来源:工人日报) 本报讯 ...
最高法:以交叉执行为牵引 有效解决执行难
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2026-01-26 02:55
二是立审执"一盘棋"效能有效发挥。 三是交叉执行攻坚克难成效显著。重点聚焦人民群众关注的"骨头案""信访案""疑难案""长期未结案",全面推进交叉执行落地落实。2023年10月以来,全国 法院已交叉执行47.7万件,22.25万件难案积案取得实质进展或者化解,执行到位金额1668.82亿元,基本实现交叉执行全国法院(除西藏部分地区以外)"全覆 盖"。 四是执破衔接激活市场要素动能释放。贯彻落实党的二十届四中全会重大部署,推动司法判决执行与破产制度有机衔接。全力开展"终本出清"活动,累计 963.82万件终本案件通过执破衔接、恢复执行、被执行人自动履行等退出终本程序;此外,移送破产案件4.84万件,1.58万家企业实现"出清"。通过执行与 破产全方位衔接,实现僵尸企业"移得出"、危困企业"治得早",最大程度以法治化方式促推要素市场化配置。 经济观察网据央视新闻客户端消息,今天,最高人民法院召开新闻发布会,介绍"人民法院以交叉执行为牵引、有效解决执行难"的相关情况。 近年来,人民法院持续深化执行改革,稳步推进执行工作规范提升三年专项行动,在以交叉执行为牵引,立审执协调、终本出清、失信惩戒分级分类、队伍 建设协同支 ...
江苏法院为51名工人解决忧“薪”事,入选最高院典型执行案例
Yang Zi Wan Bao Wang· 2026-01-04 14:42
Group 1 - The case highlights the effective use of the "execution and bankruptcy connection" mechanism by the court to resolve wage arrears issues efficiently [2] - A pet food company in Jiangsu, facing internal disputes and unable to pay over 380,000 yuan in wages to 51 workers, was forced to close [1] - The court facilitated the quick disposal of perishable inventory, generating over 80,000 yuan to mitigate losses, while also initiating bankruptcy proceedings to ensure workers received their wages [1][2] Group 2 - The execution court's proactive approach in transitioning from execution to bankruptcy procedures provided a model for handling complex wage arrears cases involving multiple stakeholders [2] - The shareholders of the company, initially uncooperative, ultimately paid the remaining execution funds during the bankruptcy review process, allowing the workers to withdraw their bankruptcy application [1]
最高法典型案例:为处理“执行不能”涉众型欠薪案件提供范本
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-31 04:32
Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has effectively utilized the execution-to-bankruptcy transition mechanism to address "execution inability" cases involving wage arrears, providing a model for handling such cases involving multiple stakeholders [1][3]. Group 1: Case Handling and Mechanisms - The Supreme People's Court has guided local courts to enhance execution supervision through cross-execution, resolving long-standing cases related to wage arrears for migrant workers and labor disputes [1]. - Various local courts have employed unique execution measures, such as leveraging government-court collaboration to resolve execution deadlocks and using cross-execution to efficiently control assets for the benefit of workers [1][3]. - In a specific case involving a pet food company, the court utilized the execution-to-bankruptcy transition mechanism to address wage arrears, leading to the successful collection of wages for 51 workers after the company was unable to pay its debts [2][3]. Group 2: Impact and Significance - The Supreme People's Court emphasized that these typical cases are representative and provide guidance for lower courts, promoting effective wage arrears governance and creating a favorable social atmosphere for protecting workers' rights [3]. - The case exemplifies a proactive approach by the execution court, which not only focused on existing asset liquidation but also initiated bankruptcy proceedings to ensure workers received their due wages [2][3].
最高法:将加大对涉农民工工资等欠薪案件执行力度
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-31 03:25
Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released typical cases of governance on wage arrears, emphasizing the legal protection of workers' wage rights, particularly for migrant workers, and highlighting various effective execution measures taken by local courts [1]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: The court in Chuzhou, Anhui, utilized a government-court linkage mechanism to resolve execution difficulties, successfully freezing receivables from schools to ensure payment of over 1.16 million yuan to 61 workers [2][3][5]. - Case 2: The court in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, implemented a cross-execution mechanism, coordinating with other courts to secure the payment of over 1.39 million yuan to 62 migrant workers within a month [6][7]. - Case 3: The court in Suqian, Jiangsu, effectively managed the liquidation of perishable goods to recover 380,000 yuan owed to 51 workers, transitioning to bankruptcy proceedings to ensure payment [8][9][10]. - Case 4: The court in Jinshan, Shanghai, employed punitive measures against a non-compliant employer, leading to the full payment of wages owed to seven workers through coercive actions [11][12]. - Case 5: The court in Ganzhou, Jiangxi, facilitated a self-disposal process for a packaging company to quickly liquidate assets worth over 1.5 million yuan to pay 61 workers, demonstrating effective conflict resolution [13][14][15]. - Case 6: The court in Guanxian, Shandong, conducted thorough field investigations to uncover rental income, leading to the successful payment of over 600,000 yuan to 34 workers [16]. Group 2: Mechanisms and Strategies - The "government-court linkage" mechanism has proven crucial in executing cases related to wage arrears, enhancing efficiency and pressuring non-compliant parties to fulfill their obligations [5]. - The "cross-execution" mechanism allows for coordinated efforts across different jurisdictions, showcasing the advantages of information sharing and asset control in resolving wage disputes [7]. - The integration of execution and bankruptcy procedures provides a model for addressing complex wage arrears cases, ensuring that workers' rights are prioritized even in challenging circumstances [10]. - The use of punitive measures and collaborative enforcement strategies effectively deters non-compliance and reinforces the legal framework protecting workers' rights [12].
“十五五”部署推动“执破衔接”,提高破产启动意愿仍是挑战| 解读“十五五”
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-11-24 12:06
Core Viewpoint - The integration of judicial enforcement and bankruptcy systems is essential for effectively revitalizing seized and frozen assets, as outlined in the "14th Five-Year Plan" [1][4]. Group 1: Judicial Mechanism and Bankruptcy Integration - The mechanism of integrating judicial enforcement with bankruptcy, known as "executive transfer to bankruptcy," has been in place since 2015 and aims to facilitate the transition of cases from enforcement to bankruptcy proceedings [3][4]. - The increase in court enforcement cases has led to a rise in enterprises facing asset seizures, resulting in significant economic resources being "frozen" and hindering market activity [2][5]. - The "executive transfer to bankruptcy" mechanism has faced challenges, including difficulties in initiating procedures and insufficient rescue functions for market entities [3][6]. Group 2: Challenges and Future Directions - There are several constraints to advancing the integration of judicial enforcement and bankruptcy, such as insufficient institutional supply and difficulties in initiating transfer procedures [6][8]. - The current bankruptcy system is perceived as harsh on debtors, leading to a lack of motivation for both creditors and debtors to initiate bankruptcy proceedings [7][9]. - Recent amendments to the bankruptcy law aim to encourage debtors to enter bankruptcy proceedings, but overall, the bankruptcy framework still requires optimization [9].