据了解，自2024年启动"贵法智库丛书"编撰以来，省高院联合人民法院出版社，组织全省法院精干力 量，围绕司法实践中的重点难点问题开展系统调研、反复论证，历经两年形成首批研究成果。丛书由 《执源治理实践与探索》《数字法院建设实践与展望》和"贵州法院类案审判要件指南"三大板块组成， 注重理论与实践结合，突出问题导向和实践指向。 其中，《执源治理实践与探索》聚焦"有效解决执行难"，系统梳理贵州在全国率先探索执源治理的制度 创新；《数字法院建设实践与展望》围绕司法数字化转型，探讨大数据、人工智能等新技术在司法领域 的应用场景，总结电子卷宗"单套制"、政法协同办案等创新实践；"贵州法院类案审判要件指南"聚焦常 见罪名与案由，已于2025年完成20项，并将按三年规划分批次出版，旨在为一线法官提供精准实用的裁 判指引。 近年来，贵州法院系统将"公正与效率"贯穿工作全过程，深入实施"一体两翼三大工程"，审判质量指标 连续两年全面达标，服判息诉率保持在98.55%的高位。此次丛书出版，是对相关创新实践的系统梳理 和集中呈现。 转自：贵州日报 本报讯（记者 陈景雄 实习生 王子乐）1月20日，贵州省高级人民法院召开"贵法智库丛书 ...

据介绍，近年来，人民法院持续优化网上诉讼服务，以四级法院实现"一张网"办案办公为契机，迭代"人民法院在线服务"，升级人民法院调解平台，做 到"诉讼掌上办、调解不用跑"。 （来源：经济日报） 转自：经济日报 平均每分钟近百件案件实现"掌上立"，近三成立案申请在非工作时间和非工作日提交。记者1月30日从最高人民法院获悉，2025年，全国法院在线调解案件 835.2万件，诉讼服务满意率达90.4%，较2024年增加7.2个百分点。 最高人民法院审判委员会委员、立案庭庭长钱晓晨表示，以数字法院建设为牵引，全面深化信息技术与多元解纷融合应用，推进科技赋能向基层延伸，持续 深化人民法院调解平台"进乡村、进社区、进网格"，全国1万多家人民法庭在线对接23.4万家基层治理单位，较2024年增加4082家，通过"云上"指导、联合 调处，把解纷服务送到群众"家门口"。 同日，最高法等20家单位发布《关于深化"总对总"多元化纠纷解决机制改革的意见》，为健全完善覆盖全面、优势互补、有机衔接、分层递进、线上线下的 多元解纷格局，提供了制度保障。 数据显示，2025年，"总对总"合作单位在法院指导下调解案件98.5万件，其中，依托法院调 ...

南都讯记者刘嫚发自北京 1月30日，最高人民法院审判委员会委员、立案庭庭长钱晓晨在最高人民法院 发布会上介绍，2025年，依托"人民法院在线服务"，平均每分钟近百件案件实现"掌上立"，近三成立案 申请在非工作时间和非工作日提交；全国法院在线调解案件835.2万件。 此外，钱晓晨介绍，人民法院坚持规则引领与平台支撑同向发力，制定《人民法院诉讼服务标准化工作 指引》，将立案、调解等48项服务功能、137个诉讼服务节点纳入平台进行标准化管理。全面畅通满意 度评价渠道，健全评价、反馈、整改、监督、提升全流程闭环工作机制，充分运用评价结果促推提升诉 讼服务质效。2025年，全国法院诉讼服务满意率达90.4%，较2024年增加7.2个百分点，人民群众获得感 更加充实、更有保障、更可持续。 （文章来源：南方都市报） 在持续优化网上诉讼服务方面，钱晓晨称，以四级法院实现"一张网"办案办公为契机，迭代"人民法院 在线服务"，升级人民法院调解平台，做到"诉讼掌上办、调解不用跑"。2025年，依托"人民法院在线服 务"，平均每分钟近百件案件实现"掌上立"，近三成立案申请在非工作时间和非工作日提交；全国法院 在线调解案件835.2万 ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a digital court system in E'tuoke Banner enhances the judicial environment, promoting efficient and convenient judicial services that support high-quality economic and social development [2] Group 1: Online Filing and Accessibility - The online filing system allows businesses to complete applications, document submissions, and fee payments without leaving their premises, significantly reducing time and costs [3] - Cross-regional filing services are implemented to facilitate businesses operating in multiple areas, ensuring proximity in filing and comprehensive handling [3] - A green channel for enterprise-related disputes prioritizes small and micro enterprises, ensuring their cases are processed swiftly [3] Group 2: Smart Court Trials - Remote video trials and asynchronous hearings are promoted, enabling participants to engage via mobile or computer, with automatic generation of trial records [4] - The "no clerk" trial model utilizes AI for real-time transcription, enhancing trial efficiency and reducing the burden on participants [4] Group 3: Diverse Mediation - A multi-channel dispute resolution system is established, integrating judges, professional mediators, and industry experts to address common business-related disputes [5] - The online mediation platform allows parties to participate in mediation anytime and anywhere, effectively resolving conflicts while conserving judicial resources [5] Group 4: Extended Digital Services - Continuous improvement of the digital court system includes 24-hour self-service centers and electronic delivery, aiming to reduce the processing time for enterprise-related cases [6] - A creditworthiness whitelist for enterprises is established to enhance the efficiency of case handling [6] - The launch of an electronic guarantee platform for litigation preservation simplifies processes and improves asset preservation efficiency [6]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Shanghai International Commercial Court and the recent ruling on the validity of temporary arbitration agreements signify a significant step in enhancing the legal framework for international commercial disputes in Shanghai, providing businesses with more options for resolving disputes and fostering a favorable business environment [9][10][12]. Group 1: Legal Developments - The Shanghai Maritime Court confirmed the validity of a temporary arbitration agreement in a case involving two companies, marking the first such ruling since the implementation of the Shanghai regulations on international commercial arbitration [9][10]. - The recent amendments to the arbitration law clarify and improve the temporary arbitration system, specifically for foreign-related maritime disputes and those arising in free trade zones [10][11]. - The Shanghai Maritime Court's ruling respects the autonomy of the parties involved and enhances the options available for resolving maritime disputes, particularly in free trade zones, which is expected to attract foreign investment [11][12]. Group 2: Judicial Efficiency - In the first three quarters of the year, the Shanghai Maritime Court accepted 544 maritime cases based on party agreements, indicating a strong trend in foreign-related jurisdiction [12]. - The Shanghai International Commercial Court, established in December 2024, aims to centralize the handling of foreign-related commercial cases, integrating arbitration and mediation resources to create a one-stop dispute resolution platform [12]. - The average case processing time for foreign-related commercial and arbitration judicial reviews was reported to be only 54.9 days, showcasing the efficiency of the judicial system in Shanghai [12]. Group 3: Intellectual Property and AI - A recent ruling in Shanghai clarified that AI-generated prompts do not qualify for copyright protection, addressing a new legal challenge posed by the rise of AI technologies [13][14]. - The Shanghai courts have been actively increasing judicial support in key areas such as AI, handling over 70,000 cases related to the digital economy and platform economy in recent years [14]. - The implementation of punitive damages for intellectual property infringement has led to a significant increase in compensation amounts, with 2024 seeing a total of 1.814 billion yuan awarded, reflecting a 17% year-on-year increase [15]. Group 4: Digital Innovations in Judiciary - The Shanghai courts have developed over 1,800 digital applications to assist judges in case management, enhancing efficiency and accuracy in handling cases [16][18]. - A specific application targeting fraudulent divorce cases has been implemented to help identify potential debt evasion, showcasing the integration of digital tools in judicial processes [16][17]. - The digital transformation has led to a reduction in case processing times, with some cases being resolved in as little as 45 days, compared to the previous average of 90 days [17][18].

Core Insights - The integration of technology in court systems is transforming judicial processes, enabling real-time participation and automatic documentation during trials [1][3] - Digital management systems are significantly improving operational efficiency in courts, with incident handling rates increasing from 30% to 85% and operational efficiency rising by 150% [2] - The digital transformation in judiciary is not just a technological upgrade but a deep practice of the principle of justice for the people, enhancing fairness and efficiency in legal proceedings [3] Group 1: Operational Management - The shift from a reactive to a proactive operational management approach is facilitated by digital tools that allow for automatic alerts and quick resolutions of issues [2] - The establishment of a unified management system, including a centralized operation center and real-time monitoring platforms, has led to substantial improvements in court operations [2] Group 2: Technological Empowerment - The use of intelligent assistants and knowledge service platforms is providing judges with essential support, allowing them to focus on core judicial responsibilities [3] - The digital court system is evolving to accommodate various trial formats, including local hearings, internet trials, and remote interrogations, all integrated into a single platform [4] Group 3: Smart Courtrooms - The implementation of a cloud-based architecture in smart courtrooms ensures data security while optimizing resource utilization [4] - The smart courtroom system has successfully conducted over 530 trials with a satisfaction rate exceeding 95%, showcasing its effectiveness and user acceptance [4]

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court reported that during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, a total of 189.745 million cases were accepted by courts nationwide [1] - The court emphasized its commitment to uphold the leadership of the Party in judicial work and to serve the overall situation and the people through high-quality adjudication [1] Group 1: National Security and Social Stability - The court has implemented a comprehensive national security strategy, strictly enforcing criminal policies to combat organized crime, telecom fraud, and online violence, concluding 5.231 million criminal cases [1][2] Group 2: High-Quality Development - The judiciary is focused on creating a legal business environment to support economic development, adapting to major strategies like the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [2] - A total of 2.34 million intellectual property cases were concluded, promoting innovation and regulating abuse of power [2] Group 3: Social Welfare and Public Interest - The courts resolved 23.466 million cases related to education, employment, elderly care, and healthcare, addressing significant public concerns such as high bride prices and false advertising [2] - Efforts are being made to resolve execution difficulties and ensure timely fulfillment of court judgments [2] Group 4: Judicial Reform and Management - The judiciary is enhancing trial management in line with judicial principles, promoting the construction of digital courts, and improving the quality and credibility of judicial services [3] - The courts will continue to fulfill their legal responsibilities and provide robust judicial support for economic and social development during the "15th Five-Year Plan" period [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the document emphasizes the need for strict and fair judicial practices to promote social justice and enhance people's welfare, while also deepening judicial system reforms to support China's modernization and national rejuvenation efforts [1] - The document outlines the importance of strengthening financial trial work by strictly punishing financial crimes such as market manipulation, insider trading, and money laundering, while also improving the judicial rules for emerging financial disputes [1][2] - It highlights the necessity of creating a law-based business environment by enforcing laws against economic crimes and corruption, ensuring equal treatment for all forms of economic property rights, and preventing administrative interference in economic disputes [2] Group 2 - The document stresses the enhancement of intellectual property trial work, particularly in protecting technological innovations and trade secrets, and improving the appellate mechanisms for intellectual property cases [2][3] - It calls for the establishment of a unified case handling system across courts, promoting digital court construction, and ensuring the security of judicial data while enhancing the application of digital and intelligent judicial practices [3] - The document emphasizes the importance of building a professional court team, improving the training system for judges, and maintaining strict internal supervision to combat judicial corruption [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the judicial work in the new era to build a fair, efficient, and authoritative socialist judicial system in China [1][2]. Group 1: Overall Requirements - The judicial work should be guided by Xi Jinping's Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, focusing on promoting social fairness and justice, enhancing people's well-being, and deepening judicial system reforms [3]. Group 2: Strengthening Party Leadership in Judicial Work - The article stresses the need for strict adherence to the Party's policies and decisions regarding judicial work, ensuring effective implementation at all levels [4]. - It highlights the importance of political education within the judiciary, reinforcing the confidence in the socialist judicial system [4][5]. Group 3: Ensuring Strict and Fair Justice - The need to maintain national security and social stability is emphasized, with a focus on punishing serious crimes that threaten public safety [6]. - The article discusses the importance of creating a law-based business environment by strictly punishing economic crimes and protecting property rights [7]. Group 4: Strengthening Judicial Protection in Various Areas - The article outlines the need for enhanced judicial protection in intellectual property, ecological environment, and people's livelihoods, ensuring justice in these critical areas [8][9]. - It emphasizes the importance of protecting minors' rights and interests through specialized judicial measures [10]. Group 5: Deepening Judicial System Reform - The article calls for the implementation of a judicial responsibility system, optimizing the evaluation of judicial quality and efficiency [14][15]. - It highlights the need for a transparent judicial process, ensuring the public has access to judicial information while protecting sensitive data [16]. Group 6: Strengthening Support for Judicial Work - The article discusses the importance of building a digital court system to enhance judicial efficiency and data management [17]. - It emphasizes the need for a well-trained judicial workforce, focusing on the professional development of judges and court staff [18].