（来源：光明日报） 光明图片/视觉中国 上海市徐汇区人民法院知识产权审判庭副庭 转自：光明日报 长于是（右）接受法律咨询。资料图片 上海国际商事法庭成立后，公开开庭审理并 当庭宣判一起国际货物买卖合同纠纷案。龚史伟摄/光明图片 光明图片/视觉中国 【法眼观】 "双方在合同中约定的临时仲裁条款有效，对当事人具有法律约束力。"日前，上海海事法院的一纸裁 定，给两家企业"临时仲裁协议是否有效"的争议画上了句号。 该案是《上海市推进国际商事仲裁中心建设条例》实施后上海首例确认临时仲裁协议效力的案件， 为商事海事纠纷解决提供了更多元的路径，给企业通过临时仲裁解决纠纷吃了颗"定心丸"。 近年来，上海法院为经济社会高质量发展和企业"走出去"提供了有力的司法保障。近日，最高人民 法院新闻局组织开展的"四中全会精神在基层·法院见闻"集中采访活动走进上海，从船舶码头到创新园 区，感受上海法院服务高质量发展的成绩成效。 打造国际商事海事争端解决优选地 "这协议到底作不作数？我们能不能按照约定通过仲裁解决纠纷？" 注册在上海自贸试验区和临港新片区的两家公司，签订《国际进口货物运输协议》，但因货物到港 后的运输费、报关费等产生分歧。2 ...

Core Insights - The integration of technology in court systems is transforming judicial processes, enabling real-time participation and automatic documentation during trials [1][3] - Digital management systems are significantly improving operational efficiency in courts, with incident handling rates increasing from 30% to 85% and operational efficiency rising by 150% [2] - The digital transformation in judiciary is not just a technological upgrade but a deep practice of the principle of justice for the people, enhancing fairness and efficiency in legal proceedings [3] Group 1: Operational Management - The shift from a reactive to a proactive operational management approach is facilitated by digital tools that allow for automatic alerts and quick resolutions of issues [2] - The establishment of a unified management system, including a centralized operation center and real-time monitoring platforms, has led to substantial improvements in court operations [2] Group 2: Technological Empowerment - The use of intelligent assistants and knowledge service platforms is providing judges with essential support, allowing them to focus on core judicial responsibilities [3] - The digital court system is evolving to accommodate various trial formats, including local hearings, internet trials, and remote interrogations, all integrated into a single platform [4] Group 3: Smart Courtrooms - The implementation of a cloud-based architecture in smart courtrooms ensures data security while optimizing resource utilization [4] - The smart courtroom system has successfully conducted over 530 trials with a satisfaction rate exceeding 95%, showcasing its effectiveness and user acceptance [4]

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court reported that during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, a total of 189.745 million cases were accepted by courts nationwide [1] - The court emphasized its commitment to uphold the leadership of the Party in judicial work and to serve the overall situation and the people through high-quality adjudication [1] Group 1: National Security and Social Stability - The court has implemented a comprehensive national security strategy, strictly enforcing criminal policies to combat organized crime, telecom fraud, and online violence, concluding 5.231 million criminal cases [1][2] Group 2: High-Quality Development - The judiciary is focused on creating a legal business environment to support economic development, adapting to major strategies like the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the construction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [2] - A total of 2.34 million intellectual property cases were concluded, promoting innovation and regulating abuse of power [2] Group 3: Social Welfare and Public Interest - The courts resolved 23.466 million cases related to education, employment, elderly care, and healthcare, addressing significant public concerns such as high bride prices and false advertising [2] - Efforts are being made to resolve execution difficulties and ensure timely fulfillment of court judgments [2] Group 4: Judicial Reform and Management - The judiciary is enhancing trial management in line with judicial principles, promoting the construction of digital courts, and improving the quality and credibility of judicial services [3] - The courts will continue to fulfill their legal responsibilities and provide robust judicial support for economic and social development during the "15th Five-Year Plan" period [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the document emphasizes the need for strict and fair judicial practices to promote social justice and enhance people's welfare, while also deepening judicial system reforms to support China's modernization and national rejuvenation efforts [1] - The document outlines the importance of strengthening financial trial work by strictly punishing financial crimes such as market manipulation, insider trading, and money laundering, while also improving the judicial rules for emerging financial disputes [1][2] - It highlights the necessity of creating a law-based business environment by enforcing laws against economic crimes and corruption, ensuring equal treatment for all forms of economic property rights, and preventing administrative interference in economic disputes [2] Group 2 - The document stresses the enhancement of intellectual property trial work, particularly in protecting technological innovations and trade secrets, and improving the appellate mechanisms for intellectual property cases [2][3] - It calls for the establishment of a unified case handling system across courts, promoting digital court construction, and ensuring the security of judicial data while enhancing the application of digital and intelligent judicial practices [3] - The document emphasizes the importance of building a professional court team, improving the training system for judges, and maintaining strict internal supervision to combat judicial corruption [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the judicial work in the new era to build a fair, efficient, and authoritative socialist judicial system in China [1][2]. Group 1: Overall Requirements - The judicial work should be guided by Xi Jinping's Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, focusing on promoting social fairness and justice, enhancing people's well-being, and deepening judicial system reforms [3]. Group 2: Strengthening Party Leadership in Judicial Work - The article stresses the need for strict adherence to the Party's policies and decisions regarding judicial work, ensuring effective implementation at all levels [4]. - It highlights the importance of political education within the judiciary, reinforcing the confidence in the socialist judicial system [4][5]. Group 3: Ensuring Strict and Fair Justice - The need to maintain national security and social stability is emphasized, with a focus on punishing serious crimes that threaten public safety [6]. - The article discusses the importance of creating a law-based business environment by strictly punishing economic crimes and protecting property rights [7]. Group 4: Strengthening Judicial Protection in Various Areas - The article outlines the need for enhanced judicial protection in intellectual property, ecological environment, and people's livelihoods, ensuring justice in these critical areas [8][9]. - It emphasizes the importance of protecting minors' rights and interests through specialized judicial measures [10]. Group 5: Deepening Judicial System Reform - The article calls for the implementation of a judicial responsibility system, optimizing the evaluation of judicial quality and efficiency [14][15]. - It highlights the need for a transparent judicial process, ensuring the public has access to judicial information while protecting sensitive data [16]. Group 6: Strengthening Support for Judicial Work - The article discusses the importance of building a digital court system to enhance judicial efficiency and data management [17]. - It emphasizes the need for a well-trained judicial workforce, focusing on the professional development of judges and court staff [18].