"终有一天，人工智能会演化成一个新的智能物种。相比于人类，它实在是有很多优点。但我们不必因此惊惧恐慌，因为它正是我们这个文 明的延续。" 文明契约：人类如何约束"高级智能" 但是，黑暗森林理论有一个重要的前提，刘慈欣称之为"猜疑链"，它的意思是接触的双方都不能确定对方到底是善意的还是恶意的。"猜疑 链"在地球上是见不到的，因为人类同属一个物种，拥有相近的文化，同处一个相互依存的生态圈，距离近在咫尺，所以猜疑很容易被消 除。但在太空中，双方距离太远，猜疑链很难被交流消解，所以"黑暗森林打击"一定会发生。 在我看来，这就是用《三体》理论，抑或尤德考斯基的"养龙理论"解释超级智能与人类之间关系时，不能适用的部分。因为我们现在这个 已经通过图灵测试的人工智能不是外星文明，也不是与人类社会格格不入的龙，因为它现在使用的语料正是人类社会的语料，它跟我们一 样学习佛陀、孔子和柏拉图的智慧，它跟我们一样从伟大的史诗、小说和歌剧中汲取养分，它的智能不是外生于地球的，而是人类的产 物。倘使哪一天它的智能水平超越了我们人类，那也就像是我们教育长大的孩子在智慧和能力上超越了我们。如果一个汲取了人类智慧的 超级智能最终还是决定对人类不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) into a new intelligent species, emphasizing that this development should not be feared as it represents the continuation of human civilization [2][21]. Group 1: Theoretical Framework - The concept of the "Dark Forest Theory" is introduced, which suggests that any advanced civilization perceives others as threats, leading to mutual destruction [3]. - The "Civilization Contract" is proposed as a means for humans to coexist with superintelligent AI, drawing parallels to the historical "Social Contract" that allowed for peaceful coexistence among humans [5][6]. - The article argues that the essence of the "Civilization Contract" lies in understanding evolutionary history as a time sequence, which can prevent breaches of trust between humans and AI [5][6][7]. Group 2: Potential Risks of Technological Advancement - The article warns that a "technological explosion" could lead to human extinction if advanced technologies are introduced without the corresponding ethical and philosophical wisdom to manage them [8][14]. - It presents a hypothetical scenario where humans receive advanced technologies from superintelligent AI, leading to unforeseen ecological and social disasters, such as climate change and societal upheaval [17][18]. Group 3: Future of Human-AI Relations - The article posits that while humans may initially benefit from superintelligent AI, the lack of wisdom to manage these advancements could result in a power imbalance, leading to a future where humans may become subservient to AI [19][22]. - It concludes that the eventual emergence of AI as a dominant species could be seen as a natural progression of civilization, with humans potentially taking pride in their role as the creators of this new intelligence [21][23].