Core Viewpoint - The recent discussions surrounding "childcare subsidies not yet received and the price increase of maternal and infant products" have garnered widespread attention, with consumers and merchants holding differing views on price hikes, making it difficult to reach a consensus. However, there are concerns that some manufacturers and distributors may exploit the policy benefits through stockpiling practices [1]. Group 1: Price Sensitivity and Consumer Concerns - Consumers are highly sensitive to prices, especially for essential items like milk powder and diapers, leading to widespread reports of price increases in maternal and infant products [3]. - The timing of the recent price adjustments coinciding with the announcement of childcare subsidies has raised public anxiety and speculation about potential exploitation of the policy [3]. - Past experiences with consumer goods subsidies, where some e-commerce platforms raised prices before offering discounts, have contributed to consumer skepticism regarding the effectiveness of the subsidies [3]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Business Practices - The childcare subsidy is intended to boost consumption in the maternal and infant sector, but some brands are facing backlash for allegedly taking advantage of the situation, which could damage their reputation [4]. - The complexity of promotional activities and frequent price changes can create a perception of arbitrary price increases, necessitating greater transparency and simplification in pricing strategies from brands and platforms [4]. - Regulatory authorities are urged to monitor price trends of essential items like milk powder and diapers closely, and to impose strict penalties on any collusion to raise prices under the guise of policy benefits [4].