法院认为，被告人易庚华持刀故意剥夺他人生命，其行为已构成故意杀人罪。被告人犯罪手段残忍，犯 罪后果和罪行严重，应当依法予以严惩。鉴于公诉机关未能提供现场勘查笔录、尸体检验报告等证据， 量刑证据存在瑕疵。综合考量被告人犯罪的事实、犯罪的性质、情节和对社会的危害程度，对被告人易 庚华判处死刑，可不必立即执行。法院遂依法作出上述判决。 被害人家属、被告人家属、人大代表、政协委员及各界群众旁听了宣判。 央视网消息：据湛江市中级人民法院网站消息，2025年12月23日，广东省湛江市中级人民法院一审 公开宣判被告人易庚华故意杀人案，以故意杀人罪判处易庚华死刑,缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终 身。 经审理查明，1992年12月22日上午，被告人易庚华与被害人李某平（殁年9岁）的父亲李某祥因工资纠 纷发生争执。当天下午，易庚华到李某平就读的小学，将李某平从学校带离至雷州市北和镇某甘蔗园 内，持刀捅刺致其死亡后潜逃。后易庚华被公安机关抓获归案。 ...

2025年12月20日，四川省成都市中级人民法院一审公开宣判被告人梁某滢故意杀人一案，对被告人梁某 滢以故意杀人罪判处死刑，缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终身。 法院经审理查明：被告人梁某滢在成都市郫都区某小区居住期间，经常无故与家人吵闹、摔打物品、对 同小区其他住户进行敲门滋扰，住户曾因此与其发生争执而报警，民警处置后要求梁某滢家人对其严格 管理。2024年6月9日，梁某滢再次在上述小区对其他住户进行敲门滋扰，在敲击被害人王某雅家房门 时，王某雅通过"猫眼"看到梁某滢在其家门口吐痰，遂通过其母联系小区保安到场处理。小区保安到场 劝离时，王某雅打开房门质问梁某滢，二人随即发生争吵，进而在进门处抓扯、打斗。其间，梁某滢使 用随身携带的刀具捅刺、切划王某雅左胸部、头面部等处，王某雅拿起门厅鞋柜上一中空摆件击打梁某 滢头面部，保安上前制止无果。打斗中，王某雅受伤倒地，保安拨打电话报警，王某雅经抢救无效死 亡。经鉴定，王某雅系被他人用单刃锐器刺击左胸部导致左肺破裂致急性大失血死亡；梁某滢右侧鼻骨 及上颌骨额突骨折构成轻伤二级；梁某滢患有精神分裂症，对其2024年6月9日的违法行为评定为部分刑 事责任能力。 四川省成都市中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chengdu Intermediate People's Court sentenced Liang Mouying to death with a two-year reprieve for intentional homicide, emphasizing the severity of the crime and the need for legal punishment despite the defendant's partial criminal responsibility due to mental illness [1][8]. Summary by Sections Case Background - Liang Mouying frequently disturbed other residents in the community, leading to previous police interventions. On June 9, 2024, after disturbing Wang Mouya, a confrontation ensued, resulting in Liang fatally stabbing Wang [2][5]. Court Findings - The court established that Liang's actions constituted a violation of Wang's right to residential peace. The altercation escalated to violence, with Liang using a knife, leading to Wang's death. The court ruled that Liang's actions amounted to intentional homicide and did not qualify as self-defense [5][6]. Mental Health Considerations - Evidence indicated that Liang suffered from schizophrenia, which affected his criminal responsibility. The court acknowledged this condition, leading to a lighter sentence despite the severity of the crime [6][7]. Sentencing Rationale - The court applied the legal framework for sentencing, determining that Liang's actions warranted a death sentence with a two-year reprieve due to his mental health status at the time of the crime. This decision reflects the balance between the nature of the crime and the defendant's mental condition [8].

转自：法治日报 关于被告人梁某滢故意杀人案的说明 一、关于被告人梁某滢行为定性的问题 被告人梁某滢多次对同小区其他住户进行敲门滋扰，本案中又无故在王某雅家外敲门、吐痰，侵害了王 某雅住宅安宁权。王某雅在母亲提醒并电话通知保安到场的情况下开门质问，梁某滢对此不满，与王某 雅发生争吵，进而在进门处抓扯打斗。冲突中梁某滢持刀捅刺，造成王某雅死亡，其行为已构成故意杀 人罪。 三、关于被告人梁某滢作案时系限制刑事责任能力人的问题 被告人梁某滢所住小区多名住户的证言和微信群聊天记录、梁某滢2024年1月至案发时的电话和微信记 录、2024年2月梁某滢父亲拨打120电话录音均证实，梁某滢作案前存在精神异常。2023年8月因梁某滢 敲门滋扰其他住户，双方报警后，民警的出警记录证实，梁某滢的行为异于常人，可能存在精神问题， 民警要求其父母严格管理。王某雅母亲案发当天与王某雅的微信聊天记录及案发后的证言反映，其也认 为梁某滢精神异常，提醒王某雅不要开门。公安机关依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》等相关规定， 委托鉴定机构对梁某滢进行了法医精神病学鉴定。本案鉴定机构经法定机关审核取得《司法鉴定许可 证》，鉴定人员均取得法医精神病执业 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case involves a planned murder for insurance fraud, where the husband, Li, was sentenced to death for the intentional killing of his wife, Li Huan, who fell overboard during a cruise [1][16]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On June 1, 2021, the Dalian Public Security Bureau requested the Dalian Procuratorate to intervene in the case of Li's suspected intentional murder [2]. - The incident occurred on May 5, 2021, when Li Huan fell overboard from a passenger ship near Yantai, leading to her death [4]. - Li displayed unusual behavior after the incident, repeatedly urging police to issue a death certificate instead of showing typical grief [4][10]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - Initial evidence was insufficient for arrest, prompting prosecutors to visit the crime scene for further investigation [4]. - Surveillance footage revealed a lack of intimacy between Li and Li Huan, contradicting the expected behavior of a married couple [6][10]. - Li Huan's family was unaware of her marriage to Li, raising suspicions about their relationship [10]. Group 3: Evidence of Fraud - Li had a history of financial troubles, with debts exceeding 500,000 yuan, and had purchased multiple life insurance policies on Li Huan's life, totaling potential payouts of 12.3 million yuan [14][15]. - Evidence indicated that Li had forged Li Huan's identity to acquire these insurance policies, with the beneficiary being himself [14]. - Following Li Huan's death, Li attempted to claim insurance benefits, but was unable to provide necessary documentation [16]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings - The Dalian Procuratorate formally charged Li with intentional murder and attempted insurance fraud, leading to his conviction and death sentence [18]. - The court found that Li's actions constituted a serious violation of life rights and attempted to defraud insurance companies [18].

Core Points - The criminal Zhou Liren was executed for the poisoning case at Xiangtan University, where he intentionally poisoned his roommates, resulting in one death [1][2] - Zhou Liren had a background in a field related to the toxic substance colchicine, which he used to commit the crime [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Incident Overview** - Zhou Liren, a master's student at Xiangtan University, had conflicts with his roommates, leading to his decision to poison them [1] - He purchased colchicine and secretly added it to a shared food item, resulting in the death of Zhang [1][2] - **Legal Proceedings** - The court found Zhou guilty of intentional homicide, emphasizing his premeditated actions and the severe consequences of his crime [2] - The court highlighted Zhou's attempt to conceal evidence and delay medical treatment for the victim, which contributed to the fatal outcome [2]

Core Points - The article discusses the sentencing of Ye Dezhi, who was convicted of intentional homicide and sentenced to death for killing three individuals, including a child, due to delusions of being harmed by others [1][2]. Summary by Sections Case Details - Ye Dezhi was found guilty of intentionally killing three victims: Wei (69 years old), Ye (36 years old), and He (1 year and 11 months old) on the night of March 27, 2025 [1]. - The incident occurred when Ye Dezhi, armed with two kitchen knives, attacked the victims outside a residence after failing to find another individual he intended to confront [1][2]. Mental Health Assessment - Ye Dezhi was diagnosed with schizophrenia, which limited his criminal responsibility at the time of the crime [1][2]. - Despite his mental health condition, the court determined that he had a clear understanding of the illegality of his actions and the consequences, leading to a severe sentence [1]. Court's Rationale - The court emphasized the brutality of the crime, the clarity of the evidence, and the severe consequences of Ye Dezhi's actions, which warranted a death sentence without leniency [1].