每经编辑｜程鹏 近日，内蒙古呼和浩特市赛罕区呼伦贝尔南路祥瑞家园小区发生一起严重电梯人为破坏事件。小区内50部电梯中，有23部电梯的钢绳被人恶意切割，所幸 电梯检修人员在日常巡检中及时发现隐患，未造成人员伤亡。 10月23日，内蒙古呼和浩特市公安局赛罕区分局微信公号发布警情通报：10月21日，赛罕区公安机关接群众报警称："祥瑞家园小区电梯疑遭人破坏出现 故障"，公安机关当即立案侦查，现已对涉嫌损坏电梯缆绳的犯罪嫌疑人毛某某（男，37岁）、高某某（女，37岁）依法予以刑事拘留，案件进一步侦办 中。目前，受损电梯已停用抢修，今日陆续恢复运行。 10月23日，红星新闻记者从涉事小区业主了解到，电梯被损坏时，小区刚换了新的物业公司（物管）。原物业公司在10月20日给业主发布了一封公开信 称，在相关部门要求下，物业被要求更换小区所有单元门、维修监控设施设备、补交之前欠缴的92500元电梯年检费等多项本不属于应急服务事项，但在 两个月后被新的物业公司替换"被迫退场"。公开信还要求小区业主补缴物业费。 另据广州日报报道，记者采访电梯业内人士了解到，电梯门的钥匙多为三角钥匙，一般人难以接触并打开，破坏电梯的行为人对电梯结构是 ...

Core Points - The incident began when Xu reported illegal dumping of construction waste, leading to a violent confrontation with the perpetrators [1][2] - The case highlights the role of the Wujiang District Prosecutor's Office in investigating and prosecuting the involved parties [1][5] Group 1: Incident Overview - Xu witnessed illegal dumping and reported it to the authorities, which led to a retaliatory attack against him [2][3] - The attackers, including Ye, Sun, Ji, and Yang, confronted Xu, resulting in property damage estimated at over 12,000 yuan [2][4] Group 2: Investigation and Legal Proceedings - Initial investigations revealed that the construction site was owned by Sun and the dumping vehicle was operated by Ye, both of whom faced legal repercussions [3][4] - The prosecutor's office faced challenges in gathering sufficient evidence against Ye, who claimed he was not involved in the attack [4][5] Group 3: Evidence and Charges - Key evidence emerged when Sun admitted that Ye had instructed him to confront Xu, leading to the collection of recorded conversations [5][6] - The case was reclassified from intentional property damage to public disorder due to the nature of the actions taken by the defendants [6][7] Group 4: Court Outcome - In September 2024, the Wujiang District Prosecutor's Office formally charged the four individuals with public disorder, resulting in prison sentences ranging from nine months to one year and three months [7][8] - The case was recognized as an exemplary instance of investigative collaboration and supervision within the judicial system [7][8]