Core Viewpoint - The emergence of AI-generated content, particularly the "digital resurrection" of deceased individuals for commercial purposes, raises ethical concerns and questions about the boundaries of AI application in both commercial and personal contexts [1][2]. Group 1: AI in Commercial Use - The recent use of AI to create a commercial advertisement featuring the late tea expert Zhang Tianfu has sparked public debate, highlighting the potential for consumer skepticism regarding such practices [1]. - The incident underscores the need for legal frameworks to define the boundaries of AI applications, especially in commercial settings [1]. Group 2: Ethical and Legal Considerations - The rapid advancement of generative AI technology has revealed deep-seated conflicts between technological innovation, social ethics, and rights protection [2]. - There is a pressing need to establish clear legal standards and guidelines to address the misuse of AI and to promote a consensus on the ethical use of technology [2]. - Recent regulations, such as the "Artificial Intelligence Generated Synthetic Content Identification Measures," mandate explicit labeling of AI-generated content, emphasizing the responsibility of service providers and users [1].

Group 1 - The article explores the intersection of memory and technology, highlighting the human desire to preserve memories of the deceased, as illustrated by a fictional scene in the historical drama "Tiger Roars, Dragon Whispers" [1] - The evolution of memory preservation is traced from ancient portraiture to the invention of photography in the early 19th century, marking a significant leap in capturing human likeness [1] - The 21st century has seen the rise of artificial intelligence, leading to the concept of "digital resurrection," which has gained traction due to advancements in technology and the reduction of costs associated with digital human technology [3] Group 2 - In 2023, SenseTime's "Shadow" digital human technology can create realistic digital avatars from just five minutes of real video footage, evoking deep emotional responses from users [3] - The technology has allowed ordinary people to memorialize lost loved ones, as seen in various media examples where digital reconstructions evoke strong emotional reactions [3] - The emergence of "digital resurrection" has sparked a complex and diverse range of public opinions, with some viewing it as a source of comfort while others express concerns about emotional dependency and social inequality [5]