Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to explore non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies rather than invasive methods, as proposed by Chinese Academy of Sciences academician Zheng Hairong [2][3][9]. Industry Overview - The global BCI market is projected to grow from $2.35 billion in 2023 to $10.89 billion by 2033, indicating significant investment and interest in this sector [5]. - Major players in the BCI field include Neuralink, which focuses on invasive methods, and Synchron, which has developed a less invasive approach with support from tech giants like Apple and NVIDIA [2][7]. Technological Developments - Neuralink has reported advancements in its invasive BCI technology, with patients able to control complex devices using their thoughts, showcasing a leap from simple cursor control to intricate robotic manipulation [5][6]. - Synchron has achieved key safety milestones with its BCI devices, including FDA approval for temporary implants and successful long-term trials without severe adverse events [8]. Critique of Current Approaches - Zheng Hairong criticizes the invasive methods as "brute force engineering," arguing that they fail to understand the complexity of the human brain and its evolutionary history [3][9]. - He highlights the challenges of biological compatibility in invasive BCIs, noting that many electrodes fail due to the brain's natural resistance [6]. Alternative Approaches - Zheng advocates for a non-invasive approach that utilizes external technologies like ultrasound and fMRI to read and potentially write brain signals without penetrating the skull [9][10]. - This method aims to decode brain activity by observing the relationship between blood flow and neural activity, likening it to a soldier and their supplies [10]. Future of AI and BCI - Zheng outlines a three-stage evolution of AI, with the final stage being "biological intelligence" achieved through effective BCI integration [12][13]. - He envisions a future where hospitals transform into AI-driven data centers, moving away from traditional medical practices [14]. Ethical Considerations - The article raises concerns about the ethical implications of BCI technology, emphasizing the need for strong regulations to prevent misuse and ensure human control over technology [14][15]. - Global legislative efforts are underway to protect brain data, indicating a growing recognition of the ethical challenges posed by BCI advancements [15]. Timeline for Adoption - Zheng estimates that it may take 20 to 30 years for BCI technology to become a part of everyday life for the general public [17].

经济观察报记者 郑晨烨 2025年上半年，全球脑机接口（BCI）赛道持续升温。 2025年6月27日，埃隆·马斯克在其旗下脑机接口公司Neuralink的夏季进展更新会上宣布，该公司脑机接口的受试者数量已增至7人，并公开演示了通过意念 操控机械臂玩"石头剪刀布"的视频。而在稍早前的5月份，其主要竞争对手、获得苹果与英伟达支持的Synchron公司，则宣布通过一项名为BCI人机接口设备 （BCI HID）的新协议实现了与苹果设备的原生集成。 根据公开信息，目前美国企业在脑机接口领域的主流技术路径主要有两个：一是以Neuralink为代表的侵入式方案，需要通过开颅手术将微电极直接植入大脑 皮层；另一条则是Synchron公司采用的介入式方案，经由血管将传感器输送至颅内。 但在6月30日于深圳举办的科技创新院士报告厅活动上，中国科学院院士郑海荣对脑机接口进入人体的技术路径提出了不同看法。他认为，行业更应关注和 探索的，是无需手术的"无创"脑机接口技术。 "所以马斯克搞的那个东西我觉得太落后了，非得把人的大脑打开放一些芯片。"郑海荣说，"其实'道法自然'是最高的智慧。" 以Neuralink为代表的侵入式路径，更是将 ...

6月19日，清华大学神经工程实验室神经美学研究团队独家回应科技日报，对网友关注的"神秘高科 技组织"进行揭秘。 近日，小红书上出现了一篇题为"在清华不懂就问，这是个什么神秘高科技组织？"的图文笔记，引 发1.6万点赞，两千多条留言。 小红书截图 图上，8位头戴"神奇发帽"的人坐在新清华学堂舞剧演出《咏春》的观众席上，网友纷纷留言，有 人以为是集体染发看演出的行为艺术，有人说这像是被蕨类植物寄生，还有人担心会不会对身体有影 响？ 高小榕教授在首届"艺术·心理·脑科学"暨神经美学大会上发言 真实剧场神经美学实验 "这是国内首次将无创脑机接口技术系统性应用于美学与艺术研究，也是国内首个真实剧场神经美 学实验。我们的实验目标是在现场真实剧院场景下，结合神经科学研究方法，借助高精度脑电设备同步 捕捉观众在欣赏演出时的神经活动，对观众的审美体验进行解码。我们希望通过这一跨学科的探索，推 动技术在理解人类审美体验中的新应用，为艺术认知研究开辟新的路径。"清华大学生物医学工程学院 神经工程实验室主任高小榕教授告诉科技日报记者。 神经美学是神经科学的分支学科，是艺术人文与自然科学交叉融合的新兴学科。其核心是探讨人类 如何在神经 ...