Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a comprehensive intellectual property (IP) value assessment system is crucial for transforming "intellectual property" into "assets" and achieving deep integration of technology and finance [1] Group 1: Current Situation and Challenges - The current IP value assessment in China faces high uncertainty, difficulty in revenue forecasting, and a lack of comparable market cases, which affects asset pricing, financing amounts, and financial decision-making [2] - Compared to mature markets like the US and Europe, China's IP financial value assessment system has notable gaps, including insufficient detail in assessment standards and high reliance on individual assessors' judgment, leading to significant result volatility [2] - Key reasons for these challenges include insufficient market transaction information, a lack of interdisciplinary talent, and an inadequate collaborative mechanism among IP management, financial regulatory bodies, and assessment organizations [2] Group 2: Solutions and Recommendations - To address assessment challenges, it is essential to improve standard construction by developing more operational classification assessment guidelines and parameter standards for different types of IP, led by the National Intellectual Property Administration [3] - Encouraging innovation in assessment methods and technologies by integrating big data analysis, AI modeling, and blockchain verification can enhance the reliability of assessment results [3] - Supporting the establishment of specialized IP assessment institutions and cultivating relevant talent through a comprehensive training system will help develop professionals who understand technology, law, and finance [3] - Improving the statistical data and publication mechanisms for IP value can provide real and comparable references for market-based assessments [3]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a comprehensive intellectual property (IP) value assessment system is crucial for transforming "intellectual property" into "assets" and achieving deep integration of technology and finance [1][2]. Group 1: Current State of IP Valuation - The modern asset assessment system in China began during the early reform period, primarily focusing on tangible assets, with IP valuation initially serving state-owned enterprises and research institutions [2]. - Over the past decade, the role of IP valuation has shifted from a supporting role to a central role in risk control within financial institutions, as the value of IP as an innovative asset has become increasingly recognized [2][3]. - Challenges in IP valuation include high uncertainty, difficulty in revenue forecasting, and a lack of comparable market cases, which hinder asset pricing and financing decisions [2][3]. Group 2: Challenges in IP Valuation - Insufficient market transaction information and a lack of a transparent pricing data mechanism in the IP trading market limit the effectiveness of market-based assessments [3]. - There is a shortage of cross-disciplinary talent in China, as domestic assessors often lack the comprehensive knowledge of IP law, financial analysis, and risk management that their foreign counterparts possess [3]. - The absence of an efficient information-sharing and standard-building mechanism among IP management, financial regulatory bodies, and assessment organizations hampers the development of a robust assessment framework [3]. Group 3: Proposed Solutions - The National Intellectual Property Administration should lead the development of more actionable classification assessment guidelines and parameter standards for different types of IP, enhancing the credibility of assessment results [4]. - Innovation in assessment methods and technologies should be encouraged, incorporating big data analysis, AI modeling, and blockchain verification to support reliable valuation models [4]. - There is a need to establish a comprehensive training system for IP valuation professionals, integrating IP knowledge into ongoing education and promoting the development of interdisciplinary talent [4].