近日，侵华日军第七三一部队罪证陈列馆首次公开原鼠疫班成员佐藤秀男的完整版采访。"把鼠疫菌变 成武器""人体实验，一直在做"…… 这份由日本学者西里扶甬子录制的47分钟证言，是加害者亲口供述 的又一关键铁证。 否认历史者，是在书写新的罪恶。一些人越是否认，我们越要坚决揭露。无论是继续加强海内外新发现 细菌战主题史料文献的搜集整理及编译工作，还是拍摄各类文艺作品，推动国际舆论场认知转变，不断 挖掘、记录、讲述，守护真相、抵御遗忘就有更多支撑。 谈到《恶魔的饱食》引发广泛关注，日本作家森村诚一曾直言，"有人说这是在全世界让日本丢脸的自 虐行为，但真正让日本丢脸的是将自己犯下的非人道的战争罪行掩盖起来的做法。"篡改历史、掩盖罪 孽，拒不认罪、一错再错，只会再次被历史的车轮碾压得粉碎。 图片来源：央视新闻。 此外，日本国内也有一些良知之声——日本广播协会电视台曾多次播放纪录片，揭露"精英'医者'与人 体实验"的丑陋嘴脸；2024年8月，94岁的731部队"少年队"原队员清水英男时隔79年重返哈尔滨谢罪。 如佐藤秀男的证言这般，加害者的亲口供述，与现存档案、遗址相互印证，形成了一条涵盖日军各级军 官和人员的完整证据链，完 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japan is accelerating its shift towards militarization under the guise of "self-defense," with significant budget increases aimed at enhancing military capabilities and forming strategic encirclement against China [1] Budget and Military Spending - The budget for the "Government Security Capability Enhancement Support" (OSA) project for the fiscal year 2026 is set at 18.1 billion yen, more than double that of fiscal year 2025, marking the first increase in five years [1] - The total defense budget for the new fiscal year exceeds 9 trillion yen, setting a new historical record [1] - The Foreign Ministry's budget proposal for the new fiscal year reaches a new high of 817 billion yen, with a 21.6% increase allocated for "information warfare" regarding historical issues with foreign countries [1] Political and Military Implications - The budgetary changes reflect a broader trend of Japan's right-wing forces pushing for a revival of militarism, undermining the post-war pacifist constitution [1] - Japan's recent military actions and rhetoric, including threats towards China and provocations against neighboring countries, indicate a systematic shift away from its "self-defense" principles [1] Historical Context and Observations - Japan's right-wing factions view their defeat in World War II as a "shame" to be concealed rather than a "guilt" to be reflected upon, leading to a distorted narrative of history [1] - The current economic stagnation and internal crises in Japan are driving right-wing politicians to divert attention towards militarization, reminiscent of Japan's historical patterns before World War II [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese militarism is identified as the main driving force behind Japan's expansionist policies and serves as the ideological foundation for post-war right-wing forces [2][12]. Group 1: Ideological Foundations - The "Kōkashikan" (Emperor's view of history) emphasizes the divine nature of the Emperor and promotes the idea of Japan as a "divine nation," asserting the superiority of the Japanese people over others and their right to rule [2]. - The Bushido spirit has been distorted into a national moral code, fostering a fervent attitude towards war and a disregard for life and death, leading to unconditional loyalty to war instigators [2]. - Social Darwinism, introduced from the West, has been perverted into a "survival of the fittest" theory, providing a "scientific basis" for external aggression and colonial expansion [2]. Group 2: Characteristics of Militarism - Japanese militarism sanctifies aggressive wars, using the Yasukuni Shrine as a religious apparatus to deify war dead, thereby enticing generations of Japanese to become willing sacrifices in wars [4]. - The ideology promotes racial superiority, with Shintoism fostering a sense of national superiority that is used to justify the oppression of other nations, framing conflicts as struggles between races [5]. - Historical precedents show that Japan has often initiated conflicts under the guise of self-defense, manipulating crises to justify military actions, such as the invasion of China and the attack on Pearl Harbor [9][10]. Group 3: Evolution of Militarism - The evolution of Japanese militarism reflects a gradual erosion of democratic institutions by military dictatorship, leading to a situation where the entire populace is effectively held hostage by militaristic ideologies [12]. - Despite being stripped of its right to wage war post-World War II, Japan has not fully reckoned with its militaristic past, allowing dangerous ideologies to resurface under the guise of a "peaceful nation" [12]. - The rise of "new militarism" is characterized by a push for historical revisionism and a rightward shift in society, undermining Japan's post-war pacifism [18]. Group 4: Impact on International Relations - The resurgence of militarism poses a significant threat to regional peace and stability, impacting Japan's relationships with neighboring countries and the global community [19]. - The actions and rhetoric of right-wing politicians, exemplified by figures like Sanae Takaichi, are not isolated incidents but part of a broader trend that threatens global peace [19][22]. - The persistence of militaristic ideologies in Japan represents a real and urgent crisis, necessitating a collective response from the international community to prevent the resurgence of militarism [22].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of militarism in Japan, particularly through the actions and statements of political figures like Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, which reflect a troubling trend of historical revisionism and militaristic rhetoric that threatens regional and global stability [1][9][16]. Group 1: Historical Context and Current Developments - The article highlights the historical context of Japanese militarism, tracing its roots back to events such as the First Sino-Japanese War and the Pacific War, where Japan used the concept of "crisis" to justify military aggression [3][4]. - Recent statements by Japanese leaders, particularly Takaichi's assertion that "Taiwan's issues" could trigger Japan's collective self-defense, mark a significant shift in Japan's military posture and reflect a revival of militaristic ambitions [1][9]. Group 2: Ideological Underpinnings - The article outlines the ideological foundations of Japanese militarism, including the "Emperor-centered" view and the promotion of a sense of racial superiority, which have historically justified Japan's expansionist policies [4][7]. - The militaristic ideology is further reinforced by cultural elements such as the glorification of war and the dehumanization of enemies, which have been perpetuated through education and public discourse [6][11]. Group 3: Political and Military Implications - The rise of "new militarism" in Japan poses significant risks to regional peace, as it undermines commitments made in international agreements regarding Taiwan and other territorial issues [16][20]. - Japan's military budget has seen unprecedented increases, with plans to enhance its defense capabilities, indicating a shift from a defensive to a more aggressive military stance [12][17]. Group 4: International Reactions and Consequences - The article notes that Japan's militaristic rhetoric has drawn criticism not only from neighboring countries but also from within Japan, highlighting a growing concern over the potential for conflict [16][22]. - The international community, including countries like China and South Korea, has expressed strong opposition to Japan's revisionist history and militaristic ambitions, emphasizing the need for accountability and historical reflection [20][24].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles suggests that Japan is experiencing a resurgence of "new militarism," which is a rebranded form of militaristic ideology that has been lurking beneath the surface since the post-war period [1][2] - There is a growing strategic anxiety in Japan regarding China, characterized by a dual escape from historical defeat and the current reality of China's peaceful rise, leading to a distorted strategic perspective [1] - Some Japanese individuals are attempting to portray China as a "bully" while failing to reflect on Japan's wartime atrocities, indicating a mindset trapped in resentment over past losses [2] Group 2 - The articles highlight that Japan's militaristic tendencies are becoming more pronounced as the power dynamics between China and Japan shift increasingly in favor of China [2] - The commentary reflects a sense of urgency among certain factions in Japan to reclaim a sense of national pride and power, which is manifesting in aggressive rhetoric and actions [2] - The narrative suggests that Japan's inability to confront its historical actions is leading to a dangerous cycle of anxiety and aggression, potentially destabilizing regional relations [1][2]