有为与不为

Search documents
从城市荒野看“有为”与“不为”
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-26 03:13
Group 1 - The concept of "urban wilderness" is emerging in major cities like Shanghai and Beijing, emphasizing the importance of natural ecosystems over manicured landscapes [1][2] - The shift from aggressive urban development to a more balanced approach reflects a change in urban development logic, integrating economic growth with humanistic and ecological considerations [1][2] - The idea of "not doing" can be seen as a strategic vision that respects natural laws and aims to restore ecological balance, highlighting the importance of both action and restraint in urban planning [2][3] Group 2 - Cities are encouraged to identify their unique missions within the national context and develop modern industrial systems that reflect local characteristics and advantages [3] - The balance between "doing" and "not doing" is crucial for sustainable development, requiring a clear understanding of when to intervene and when to allow market forces to operate freely [3] - The development of "urban wilderness" is seen as a way to enhance quality of life and promote high-quality development through a harmonious relationship with nature [3]
有为、不为与善为(评论员观察)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-07-20 21:52
Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of balancing "active" and "passive" development strategies in urban planning, highlighting the need for cities to adapt to natural ecosystems rather than solely focusing on construction and development [1][2][3] - The concept of "not doing" is presented as a strategic approach that respects natural laws and promotes ecological balance, contrasting with the previous focus on aggressive land development [2][4] - Successful urban development requires understanding local conditions and leveraging unique advantages, avoiding redundant construction and focusing on sustainable projects that align with regional strengths [3][4] Group 2 - The article discusses the significance of recognizing the boundaries of intervention in market dynamics, advocating for a balance between government regulation and allowing market forces to operate freely [4] - It highlights examples of cities successfully integrating ecological considerations into urban planning, such as the development of "urban wilderness" areas that enhance biodiversity and community engagement [1][2] - The narrative suggests that achieving high-quality development and improved living standards is contingent upon effectively navigating the interplay between "doing" and "not doing" in urban governance [4]