当地时间12月2日，韩国总统李在明表示，恢复韩朝间对话是和平共存的必要条件，提议恢复韩朝间的 联络渠道。 在当天的民主和平统一咨询会议启动仪式上，李在明发表演说表示："我们面临的时代课题是终结韩朝 间的敌对和对决态势，建立和平共存的新韩朝关系，如果我们真诚努力，朝方的态度也会发生变化"。 李在明提出，为了韩朝共同成长，应该促进双方的合作。为此，他提议恢复韩朝间的联络渠道，以重启 坦诚的对话。对于具体的合作领域，李在明表示"从气候环境、灾难安全、医疗卫生等全球关注的领域 以及韩朝共同需求较大的交流合作项目开始，逐步推进"。 对于无核化问题，李在明表示，"为了结束朝鲜半岛的战争状态，追求半岛无核化，巩固持久和平，我 们将持续努力"。 李在明说，朝鲜半岛"统一是必经之路"，而且"统一必须是通过和平的，且所有人都能接受的方式来实 现"。 （文章来源：央视新闻） ...

Core Viewpoint - The discussions between South Korea and the United States regarding South Korea's acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines have gained significant attention, with U.S. Defense Secretary confirming support for the initiative, while also highlighting the complexities involved in negotiations and regional implications [1][2][3]. Group 1: Nuclear Submarine Acquisition - South Korea's Defense Minister confirmed that U.S. President Trump has approved the construction of nuclear-powered submarines, with the U.S. military pledging full support [1][2]. - The first nuclear-powered submarine for South Korea is expected to be launched in the mid-2030s, contingent upon successful negotiations for nuclear fuel supply with the U.S. [2][4]. - The construction of these submarines is seen as a sensitive international issue, potentially leading to an arms race in the region [1][3][5]. Group 2: Bilateral Defense Relations - The U.S. is willing to deepen cooperation with South Korea in various naval capabilities, including submarines and surface vessels, as part of a broader strategy to revitalize the U.S. shipbuilding industry [2][3]. - Discussions also included South Korea's plans to increase its defense budget and enhance the strategic flexibility of U.S. forces stationed in South Korea [6]. - There are concerns that the reliance on U.S. support for defense initiatives may lead to a deeper dependency, complicating South Korea's strategic autonomy [5][7]. Group 3: Regional Security Dynamics - Analysts warn that South Korea's pursuit of nuclear submarines could disrupt the strategic balance in Northeast Asia, potentially escalating military tensions [3][5]. - The ongoing negotiations are expected to address critical issues such as construction locations, technology transfer, and nuclear fuel acquisition, which are likely to be contentious [3][6]. - The relationship between South Korea and the U.S. remains strong, but recent events indicate growing complexities and divergences in their defense and economic dealings [6][7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the recent meeting between Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marks a significant step towards stabilizing and developing relations between Japan and South Korea, particularly in the context of shared diplomatic, trade, and security challenges [1][5]. - The meeting, which took place on August 23, is the first time a South Korean president has visited Japan before a trip to the United States, highlighting a shift in diplomatic priorities [1][5]. - Both leaders emphasized the importance of cooperation in addressing regional security issues, particularly concerning North Korea's nuclear development and the evolving geopolitical landscape in Asia [6]. Group 2 - The discussions included agreements on mutual "Working Holiday" visas, allowing young people to reside in each other's countries while working, which reflects a commitment to enhancing people-to-people exchanges [5]. - The leaders acknowledged the necessity of strategic communication between Japan and South Korea in light of changing regional strategic environments and new economic and trade orders [5][6]. - The article notes that the current South Korean administration under Lee Jae-myung has a different approach to Japan compared to the previous administration, focusing on mutual benefits and cooperation rather than historical grievances [5].

Group 1 - The unexpected opening question from President Trump regarding Kim Jong-un's well-being during the meeting with South Korean representatives indicates a continued interest in North Korea [1][3] - The recent agreement between the U.S. and South Korea includes a 15% tariff imposed by the U.S. on South Korea, while South Korea will provide $350 billion for U.S.-controlled investment projects [1] - South Korean representatives expressed confusion over the U.S. intention to retain most of the investment profits, suggesting dissatisfaction with the agreement [1] Group 2 - Despite the lack of recent dialogue, some analysts believe that the door for discussions between the U.S. and North Korea has not been completely closed [3] - Kim Yo-jong's recent statements emphasize that the U.S. must recognize North Korea as an irreversible nuclear power for dialogue to proceed, indicating a shift from denuclearization talks to arms control negotiations [4] - A White House official reiterated President Trump's commitment to the goals set during his first term regarding North Korea, including the willingness to engage with Kim Jong-un for complete denuclearization [5]

Core Viewpoint - The remarks by Kim Yo-jong indicate that North Korea perceives U.S. engagement as merely a "hope" from the American side, emphasizing a shift in the geopolitical landscape and North Korea's irreversible nuclear status [1] Group 1: North Korea's Position - Kim Yo-jong stated that North Korea's nuclear capabilities and status are irreversible, and the geopolitical environment has fundamentally changed [1] - The acknowledgment of this new reality should be the basis for any future predictions and considerations regarding North Korea [1] - North Korea is open to any options that maintain its current national status [1] Group 2: U.S. Response - On the same day as Kim Yo-jong's remarks, the White House reiterated President Trump's willingness to engage in dialogue with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to achieve complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula [1] Group 3: South Korea's Stance - The South Korean government is committed to rebuilding trust between the two Koreas in a peaceful atmosphere and aims to create favorable conditions for the resumption of U.S.-North Korea talks [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining relationships with China and Russia, suggesting that South Korea should not solely rely on its alliance with the United States [1] - The candidate, Lee Jae-myung, advocates for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, indicating a shift in diplomatic strategy [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung advocates for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula [1]