Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to shift from simple blocking of "encrypted conversations" among minors to proactive guidance, filling their psychological needs with high-quality offline companionship and activities [1][2] - The phenomenon of "encrypted conversations" among minors, such as terms like "Dream Back to Tang" and "ED Sister," is linked to dangerous games or distorted social relationships, highlighting the importance of understanding the underlying psychological needs of adolescents [1][3] - Schools play a crucial role in shaping healthy personalities and enhancing students' discernment of online information, with initiatives like immersive online safety classes being implemented in some regions [2] Group 2 - Effective strategies for protecting minors involve creating a friendly growth environment, which includes helping parents better understand their children's inner worlds through community initiatives and workshops [2][3] - The importance of offline activities, such as sports competitions and arts festivals, is emphasized as a means to foster a sense of belonging and reduce reliance on the virtual world [2] - Addressing the intrinsic needs for recognition, companionship, and social interaction among minors requires collaboration between families, schools, and society to create engaging real-world experiences [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of dangerous online trends among minors, such as the "Dreaming Back to Tang" suffocation game and the "ED" eating disorder culture, highlighting the need for collective societal efforts to protect children from these risks [1][2][4]. Group 1: Dangerous Online Trends - "Dreaming Back to Tang" is a suffocation game that induces a state of unconsciousness through chest compression, posing severe risks including brain damage and death [1][2]. - The game spreads through social groups among students, often disguised with appealing names that attract curiosity [2][4]. - "ED" refers to eating disorders, which are being glamorized in certain online communities, with individuals using coded language to discuss harmful behaviors like purging [2][3]. Group 2: Psychological Factors - Minors engage in these dangerous behaviors as a means to exert control over their bodies and cope with real-life pressures [3][4]. - Peer acceptance is often prioritized over parental approval, leading to participation in risky activities as a form of social belonging [4][5]. - The prevalence of unhealthy beauty standards online contributes to the normalization of these behaviors among youth [5][6]. Group 3: Challenges in Regulation - The covert nature of these trends makes them difficult to regulate, as they often evade traditional content moderation techniques [7][8]. - Platforms are exploring dynamic strategies to identify and intervene in harmful content, including the use of algorithms to promote positive messaging [7][8]. Group 4: Role of Parents - Effective communication between parents and children is crucial in addressing these issues, with an emphasis on empathy and understanding rather than punitive measures [9][10]. - Parents are encouraged to engage in open dialogues about their children's online experiences to foster trust and guidance [9][10].