嗅来，得凉，有甜、微苦，亦有暖意。 春梅初绽 李陶/摄 雪挂枝头，凝在梅蕊。篆一炉香，是春之信。 河岳为证，日星为鉴。法治强音，掷地有声。 雪散因和气，冰开得暖光。 偏在冷处，最见风骨。 年复一年，有香如故。 雨落幽燕，白浪滔天，今日水犹寒。 河北邯郸，一场万众瞩目的公开宣判，开启新岁法治序幕。围绕"年龄特权"，一场宽宥与救赎的思量就 此展开。 法典昭昭，明镜高悬。前有牧马童子"去其害马者"的治世之论，后有淳于缇萦"刑者不可复续"的仁心上 书。在"一关""一放"间，我们守司法之明慎，求正义之伸张。 蛰虫欲作，惊以雷霆，即便在冻土之下。 2025年3月，最高检工作报告表示，依法核准追诉低龄未成年人严重暴力犯罪34人。4月，2025年第二次 未成年人检察业务专题问题分析研判电视电话会议召开，八省"云端会诊"，共同破解涉未成年人犯罪治 理难题。6月，中国预防青少年犯罪研究会2025年年会召开，围绕"强化未成年人犯罪预防和治理"主 题，再发强音。随后，治安管理处罚法迎来首次"大修"，法不责幼的惯性认知从此被打破。10月，未成 年人权益保护与犯罪防治写入"十五五"蓝图。 天地有正气，杂然赋流形。 司法权威是霹雳雷霆，也 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has issued guidelines to enhance prosecutorial supervision aimed at preventing and addressing juvenile crime, focusing on a comprehensive system that integrates punishment, education, rights protection, prevention, and effective governance [1] Group 1: Key Measures - The guidelines consist of 6 sections and 22 articles, addressing critical aspects such as the legal handling of juvenile crime cases, promoting graded and categorized correction of juvenile misbehavior, and preventing juvenile crime at its source [1] - The guidelines emphasize the principle of "education, reform, and rescue," advocating for a balanced approach between education and punishment in the implementation of criminal policies [1] Group 2: Collaborative Efforts - The procuratorial authorities are encouraged to actively engage in family and school protection, providing guidance on family education and enforcing supervision orders in cases involving juveniles [1] - There is a focus on strengthening the connection between judicial proceedings and educational administration in the construction of safe and lawful school environments [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has issued guidelines to strengthen prosecutorial supervision and promote the prevention and governance of juvenile crime, aiming to establish a comprehensive system for the protection and prevention of juvenile crime that integrates punishment, education, rights protection, and effective governance [1][2]. Group 1 - The guidelines emphasize the principle of "education, persuasion, and rehabilitation" and the approach of "education first, punishment second," advocating for a balanced criminal policy and enhancing the accuracy and relevance of social investigations [1]. - Prosecutorial bodies are required to focus on prevention and early intervention, providing targeted assistance to juvenile offenders and supervising specialized education and rehabilitation efforts [1]. - The guidelines call for collaboration between prosecutorial agencies and relevant departments to promote governance in key industries and areas, as well as to improve the online environment for minors [2]. Group 2 - Specific measures include building a high-quality juvenile prosecution team, leveraging digital tools for efficient handling of juvenile cases, and ensuring that prosecutorial duties align closely with the "six protections" framework [2]. - The guidelines also stress the importance of integrating family and school protections in handling juvenile cases, promoting family education guidance, and implementing supervision orders to eliminate factors that lead to juvenile delinquency [1][2].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has issued guidelines to enhance the prevention and governance of juvenile crime, aiming to establish a comprehensive system that integrates punishment, education, rights protection, prevention, and effective governance for minors [1][2] Group 1: Key Measures and Principles - The guidelines consist of 6 parts and 22 articles, focusing on key aspects such as handling juvenile crime cases, promoting graded and classified correction of juvenile offenses, and preventing juvenile crime at the source [1] - The procuratorial authorities are urged to adhere to the principle of prioritizing the best interests of minors, emphasizing that prevention is protection and punishment is also a means of redemption [1][2] - The guidelines advocate for a balanced approach between punishment and prevention, integrating special and general prevention strategies to strengthen the prevention and governance of juvenile crime [1] Group 2: Implementation Strategies - The procuratorial authorities should enhance legislative spirit focused on prevention and early intervention, providing targeted assistance to juvenile offenders and supervising specialized education and correction [2] - The guidelines call for the improvement of the "four major prosecutions" for juvenile cases, promoting a systematic approach to supervision and eliminating factors that lead to juvenile delinquency [2] - Collaboration with relevant departments is emphasized to promote governance in key industries and areas, as well as to ensure compliance with laws related to juvenile protection and online safety [2] Group 3: Capacity Building and Integration - The guidelines outline specific measures for building a high-quality juvenile prosecution team and leveraging digital tools to effectively handle juvenile cases [2] - There is a focus on integrating prosecutorial duties with the "six major protections" to create a collaborative effort in preventing and addressing juvenile delinquency [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Xiangyang Municipal Procuratorate in China to strengthen the prevention and governance of crimes against minors, emphasizing a collaborative approach with educational and law enforcement agencies to create a safer environment for children [1][4][8]. Group 1: Prevention and Governance Efforts - The Xiangyang Municipal Procuratorate has integrated representative suggestions into its operations, launching a three-year campaign to prevent and address crimes against minors, aiming to create a legal environment for their healthy growth [1]. - Since 2025, the number of cases accepted for prosecution related to crimes against minors has decreased by 36%, indicating effective measures to curb the rise of such crimes [4]. - The procuratorate has actively engaged with educational departments to implement mandatory reporting systems and improve campus safety management, including training for school officials [3][8]. Group 2: Case Handling and Rehabilitation - In a notable case, a student was prosecuted for assaulting peers, leading to a prison sentence of eight years and four months, while the procuratorate also addressed systemic issues in the school involved [2]. - The procuratorate has adopted a dual approach of punishment and education for juvenile offenders, exemplified by a case where a minor involved in robbery was given a conditional non-prosecution decision after demonstrating remorse and a desire to return to education [5][6]. - Tailored rehabilitation programs have been developed for juvenile offenders, focusing on parental guidance and psychological support to prevent recidivism [6]. Group 3: Community and Educational Initiatives - The procuratorate has launched various educational initiatives, including law education programs in schools, to enhance students' awareness of legal issues and their rights [7][8]. - Collaborative efforts with community organizations have led to extensive training for parents and guardians, aiming to improve family supervision and support for at-risk youth [8]. - The establishment of specialized educational facilities and programs for juvenile offenders is underway, with the goal of providing targeted educational interventions [8].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court held the eighth National Criminal Trial Work Conference on November 13, 2025, after a six-year interval, emphasizing the importance of criminal trial work [1] - The meeting highlighted the need to integrate legal professional judgment with public perception of fairness and justice, advocating for a balanced approach in sentencing [1][2] - There is a strong focus on the severe punishment of serious crimes, including subversion and violent terrorism, to safeguard national political security [1][2] Summary by Sections Criminal Justice Philosophy - The meeting stressed the importance of a people-centered development approach, combining legal judgments with public understanding of justice [1] - It called for a comprehensive implementation of the policy of balancing leniency and severity in criminal justice, considering the social harm of crimes and public sentiment [1][2] Punishment of Serious Crimes - The meeting emphasized the need for strict punishment of serious crimes such as subversion and terrorism, reinforcing national security [1][2] - It also highlighted the ongoing efforts to combat organized crime and corruption, with a focus on economic sanctions against offenders [1][2] New and Emerging Crimes - The meeting addressed the need for strict punishment of various economic crimes, ensuring equal protection of property rights across different ownership types [2] - It called for a clear distinction between economic disputes and economic crimes to prevent misuse of criminal law in civil matters [2] Juvenile Crime Prevention - The meeting underscored the importance of a balanced approach in dealing with juvenile offenders, combining punishment with education and rehabilitation [3] - It emphasized the need to address the rising issue of internet-related crimes and the necessity for improved judicial rules to tackle these challenges [3] Judicial Statistics - From 2020 to 2024, courts adjudicated 5.8446 million criminal cases, with 7.9391 million individuals sentenced [4] - There was a notable decrease in financial crime cases, with a 15.51% drop in cases like illegal fundraising and money laundering compared to the previous five years [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the establishment and effectiveness of social guardianship bases in Suzhou, aimed at rehabilitating juvenile offenders and preventing recidivism through education, skill training, and social reintegration [1][10]. Group 1: Social Guardianship Bases - Suzhou has established 24 social guardianship bases for juvenile offenders, with 156 individuals having entered these programs, and 147 successfully completing their observation periods [1][5]. - The social guardianship work involves collaboration with socially responsible enterprises, schools, and organizations to provide education, correction, and protection for juveniles [2][10]. - The bases are categorized into various types, including enterprise, rural, school, community, and new economic organization bases, ensuring that all juvenile offenders have access to appropriate support [5][6]. Group 2: Case Studies and Success Stories - A case study of a 17-year-old named Xiao Yue illustrates the personalized approach taken by the judicial system, where he received vocational training and support after being charged with a crime [3][4]. - Xiao Yue's successful rehabilitation led him to start his own tech company, demonstrating the potential for juvenile offenders to reintegrate into society positively [4][10]. - Many juveniles in the social guardianship bases have found new opportunities and skills, which serve as a new starting point for their futures [2][5]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts and Community Involvement - The initiative emphasizes the importance of community involvement, with volunteers and local organizations playing a crucial role in supporting juvenile rehabilitation [8][10]. - The program has expanded to include pre-treatment procedures and psychological interventions for juveniles with severe issues, ensuring a comprehensive approach to rehabilitation [6][10]. - The collaboration between judicial authorities and community resources aims to create a seamless connection between judicial protection, family supervision, and social support [10].