3. **被否决的赔偿贷款方案**： 原本的提案是利用被冻结的俄罗斯资产作为抵押，发行债券，筹集资 金援助乌克兰，而乌克兰在收到俄罗斯支付的战争赔偿后才开始还款。但这一方案被拒绝，部分原因是 欧盟的金融法律和国际法考虑到直接没收俄罗斯资产的风险。比利时首相德克罗表示，理性占了上风， 欧盟仍需遵循国际法，避免引发不必要的争议。 4. **俄罗斯和匈牙利的反应**： 对于冻结俄罗斯资产 的举措，俄罗斯方面强烈反应，外交部发言人扎哈罗娃指出欧盟此举是主权盗窃，严重违反国际法。同 时，匈牙利总理欧尔班也表达了对冻结俄罗斯资产做法的担忧，表示如果欧盟能如此对待俄罗斯的资 产，那么匈牙利是否应该重新考虑存放国家储备的地方。 5. **金融风险与欧元信誉**： 目前被冻结的 俄罗斯资产大多由位于布鲁塞尔的欧洲清算银行管理，这家机构是全球金融基础设施的重要部分。分析 认为，欧盟若动用这些资产本金，可能会引发对欧洲作为安全投资地的信任危机，甚至影响欧元的全球 地位。 题目： 俄罗斯央行存放于欧洲的2100亿欧元主权资产，在欧盟峰会的辩论中最终被放回冷冻保险箱， 欧盟选择再举债900亿欧元支持乌克兰。 分析解答： 1. **欧盟 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Union (EU) is considering using frozen Russian sovereign funds, estimated at around €160 billion, to finance aid for Ukraine amidst escalating financial pressures and a significant reconstruction cost of €480 billion for Ukraine [1][4][18]. Group 1: Financial Context - The EU has provided approximately €180 billion in aid to Ukraine, which is insufficient given the estimated reconstruction costs of €480 billion [3][4]. - The EU's 2024 special aid plan for Ukraine is set at €50 billion, with €33 billion needing to be repaid as loans [3][4]. Group 2: Political and Strategic Implications - The plan to "borrow" from frozen Russian assets hinges on the uncertain outcome of the war and the potential for Russia to pay reparations, raising significant risks [4][18]. - Internal divisions within the EU regarding the use of these funds have emerged, with countries like France advocating for dual-use in military and fiscal support, while Germany insists on strict military-only usage [6][7]. Group 3: External Reactions and Risks - The plan has drawn criticism from various international actors, including China, which emphasizes the need to respect national sovereignty and property rights [7]. - Concerns have been raised by the European Central Bank regarding the potential destabilization of the euro and the global financial system if Russian assets are misused [9][11]. Group 4: Future Uncertainties - The EU faces a dilemma: proceeding with the plan could damage its financial credibility and provoke Russian retaliation, while delaying it risks undermining its commitments to Ukraine [14][16]. - Ukraine's urgent financial needs, including a projected $18 billion deficit in its 2026 budget, contrast sharply with the EU's internal disagreements, complicating the path forward [16][18].

Core Viewpoint - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has expressed concerns over the EU's plan to use frozen Russian assets to provide a €140 billion loan to Ukraine, warning that it may violate international law and damage the credibility of the euro [1][10][17]. Group 1: EU's Loan Plan - The EU plans to use approximately €300 billion of frozen Russian state assets, with about €200 billion held by the European Clearing Bank, as collateral for a €140 billion loan to Ukraine [4]. - The strategy involves investing the frozen funds into EU-supported bonds, using the generated interest and returns as "compensation" for Ukraine, thereby avoiding direct legal issues [6][17]. - Some EU member states, like Belgium, have raised concerns about the lack of clear financial responsibility guarantees before proceeding with the plan [8]. Group 2: Lagarde's Warnings - Lagarde emphasized that any plan must strictly adhere to international law, warning of severe consequences if it does not [10][12]. - She highlighted the potential risks to the euro's status as a global reserve currency, noting that investor confidence could be undermined, leading to capital outflows and currency volatility [10][15]. - Lagarde also pointed out that consensus among jurisdictions holding Russian assets, such as the US and UK, is necessary, as unilateral actions by the EU could lead to legal repercussions from Russia [13][15]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The potential financial instability resulting from the EU's actions could have far-reaching effects, including inflation, unemployment, and currency devaluation, impacting the general public [17][18]. - Lagarde's caution serves as a reminder that while the EU's intentions may be noble, the long-term stability of the euro and adherence to international law are paramount [17][18].