永续基金

Search documents
黑石的LP也没回本呢
投中网· 2025-06-17 06:27
Core Viewpoint - The private equity (PE) industry is facing significant challenges, as evidenced by the low Distribution to Paid-In (DPI) ratios of major funds, raising questions about the sustainability of the industry's business model [1][2][9]. Group 1: DPI Performance - Blackstone's 2015 vintage private equity fund has a DPI of only 0.85, which is concerning for the industry as a whole [1][2]. - Other major funds also show low DPI figures, such as KKR's 2016 vintage at 0.90 and Hellman & Friedman’s 2018 vintage at 0.13, indicating a broader trend of underperformance [9]. - Blackstone's flagship fund, BCP VII, has a DPI that is the worst in its history, with a "gross DPI" of only 1.06 after ten years, compared to better performances from older funds [9][10]. Group 2: Fundraising and Investment Challenges - The current environment shows that older funds are struggling to exit investments, while new funds are having difficulty deploying capital, leading to a stagnation in the industry [8][11]. - Blackstone's latest flagship fund, BCP IX, has only called 2.9 million USD, primarily for management fees, indicating a lack of active investment [11]. Group 3: Revenue Models and Industry Shifts - Despite low DPI, Blackstone's private equity division generated 2.64 billion USD in distributable earnings in 2024, a 39.7% increase, suggesting a shift away from reliance on carry income [15][20]. - Blackstone's management fee income has increased significantly, while carry income has not kept pace, indicating a strategic move towards a more stable revenue model [18][19]. - KKR is also transitioning its business model to focus on dividends rather than carry, which has led to a significant increase in assets under management (AUM) and market value [22][23]. Group 4: Industry Outlook and Evolution - The VC/PE industry is entering a low-margin era, with many firms struggling to maintain profitability amid increasing operational costs and tighter fee structures [25][26]. - The traditional business model of relying on carry for income is being challenged, prompting firms to explore alternative strategies, such as focusing on operational capabilities and dividend income [29][30].
黑石又做了一个“违背祖宗的决定”
投中网· 2025-05-19 07:03
Core Viewpoint - Blackstone has resorted to a guaranteed return strategy to address fundraising difficulties, promising a 9.25% annual return for its European real estate fund, BEPIF, to attract investment from a large Asian institutional investor [2][4][6]. Group 1: Fundraising Challenges - Blackstone's BEPIF has struggled with fundraising, peaking at €1 billion but currently down to €625 million, facing over €100 million in redemption requests [5][4]. - The liquidity crisis in the global private equity (PE) industry, exacerbated by aggressive interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve, has led to significant outflows from BEPIF [4][5]. Group 2: Guaranteed Return Strategy - The guaranteed return strategy is a rare move in the global PE industry, previously criticized for undermining industry fairness [2][10]. - Blackstone's previous use of this strategy in 2022 with the University of California involved a promise of 11.25% returns in exchange for a $4 billion investment, which was also aimed at resolving liquidity issues [8][10]. Group 3: Investment Opportunities - The recent €1 billion injection into BEPIF will not only alleviate liquidity issues but also allow for new investments, including the acquisition of a 50% stake in ArchCo, a UK real estate company, at a significantly reduced valuation [6][7]. - Blackstone's strategy aims to capitalize on opportunities in the European real estate market, enhancing its ownership in ArchCo while addressing liquidity concerns [7][8]. Group 4: Performance and Risks - Blackstone's previous guaranteed return agreement with the University of California has resulted in a $1 billion liability due to underperformance, with returns dropping to -0.5% in 2023 and only 1.95% projected for 2024 [10][11]. - The ongoing challenges faced by BEPIF and the implications of guaranteed returns highlight the risks associated with such strategies in the private equity sector [10][11].