Core Viewpoint - The article discusses two significant recall events in the automotive industry involving Li Auto and Xiaomi, highlighting the differences in their responses to safety incidents and the implications for consumer trust and corporate responsibility [3][4][5]. Group 1: Recall Events - On October 31, Li Auto recalled over 10,000 units of the 2024 MEGA model due to insufficient corrosion resistance in the coolant [3]. - Xiaomi recalled over 110,000 units of the Xiaomi SU7 standard version electric vehicle on September 19, following safety concerns related to the vehicle's auxiliary driving system [4]. - The recalls were triggered by serious safety incidents, with Li Auto's proactive recall occurring a week after an accident, while Xiaomi's recall was a reactive measure taken nearly six months later [3][4]. Group 2: Public Perception and Corporate Responsibility - Both companies faced criticism for downplaying the severity of the issues, with Li Auto's proactive recall failing to fully alleviate consumer concerns due to prior reports of insulation faults in the 2024 models [4][5]. - Xiaomi's characterization of the recall as an "OTA recall" blurred the seriousness of the situation, leading to significant backlash and questioning of their commitment to safety [5]. - The article emphasizes the market's zero-tolerance attitude towards automotive safety risks, urging companies to act swiftly and transparently in addressing safety issues [5]. Group 3: Regulatory and Industry Implications - There are calls for Xiaomi to initiate a proactive recall to eliminate safety hazards, reflecting a growing demand for accountability in the industry [7]. - Regulatory bodies are taking steps to enhance oversight of the electric vehicle sector, including the establishment of a more transparent recall system and the implementation of new safety reporting requirements [7]. - The article advocates for a shift in corporate safety management from reactive to proactive measures, emphasizing the importance of consumer safety and corporate social responsibility in the evolving automotive landscape [6][7].

Core Insights - The automotive industry has recently witnessed two significant recall events involving Li Auto and Xiaomi, both triggered by safety incidents, highlighting the industry's response to safety concerns [1][2] - Li Auto initiated a proactive recall of over 10,000 units of the 2024 MEGA model shortly after a safety incident, while Xiaomi's recall of over 110,000 units of the SU7 occurred nearly six months later, following an investigation [1][2] - The contrasting approaches to recalls have led to public criticism, with both companies facing scrutiny for their handling of safety issues [1][2] Group 1: Recall Events - Li Auto recalled over 10,000 units of the 2024 MEGA model due to insufficient corrosion resistance in the coolant, which raised concerns among vehicle owners [1] - Xiaomi's recall involved over 110,000 units of the SU7 standard version, with the recall linked to auxiliary driving safety issues, although it was not explicitly stated as a response to a specific incident [2] Group 2: Public Perception and Response - Li Auto's proactive recall did not fully alleviate consumer concerns, as there were prior reports of insulation faults in some 2024 models, leading to skepticism about the company's transparency [1] - Xiaomi's characterization of the recall as an "OTA recall" blurred the seriousness of the situation, resulting in negative public sentiment and backlash against the company [2] - The incidents underscore a growing market expectation for automotive companies to act swiftly and decisively in addressing safety hazards, reflecting a zero-tolerance attitude towards automotive safety risks [2]