Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile emphasizes the importance of self-discipline, integrity, and innovation in the automotive industry to foster a healthy competitive environment and enhance the overall image and competitiveness of China's automotive sector [1][4][9]. Group 1: Joint Statement and Industry Call - The three parties call for strict self-discipline in product development, testing, and promotion, urging the industry to adhere to principles of integrity and commercial ethics, and to eliminate any form of unfair competition [1][9]. - They advocate for a focus on core technology innovation and improving vehicle safety performance, encouraging the industry to prioritize genuine user experiences and technological advancements to drive industry upgrades [1][9]. Group 2: Clarification of Testing Incident - Li Auto clarifies that the purpose of the recent crash test involving the Li Auto i8 was to validate and enhance its passive safety performance, not to target any other brand's vehicle safety or quality [4][6]. - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute acknowledges its failure to clearly communicate the context of the test, which led to public misunderstandings regarding the involvement of Dongfeng Liuzhou's vehicles [6][9]. Group 3: Commitment to Quality and Integrity - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes its commitment to high quality and reliability, focusing on continuous innovation and strengthening core technologies to provide better transportation solutions [7][9]. - All three parties express their commitment to resisting unfair competition and adhering to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to the transformation of China from a major automotive country to a strong automotive nation [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement from Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile aims to clarify the recent controversy surrounding the crash test of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing the importance of transparency and brand image protection in the automotive industry [2][3][4]. Group 1: Li Auto's Position - The purpose of the crash test was to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, not to target the safety and quality of other brands [3]. - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image due to the test, acknowledging the insufficient risk assessment regarding the potential brand association [3]. Group 2: China Automotive Engineering Research Institute's Role - As the executing agency for the test, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute admitted to failing to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle was used as a "mobile barrier" and not as an evaluation of its safety and quality [4]. - The institute committed to improving its testing management mechanisms and maintaining scientific, objective, and neutral principles to uphold industry credibility [4]. Group 3: Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile's Commitment - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and core technology enhancement to create value for customers [5]. - The company pledged to resist unfair competition and adhere to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to the transformation of China from a major automotive country to a strong automotive nation [5]. Group 4: Joint Industry Initiative - The three parties called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, urging adherence to integrity and commercial ethics in product development, testing, and promotion [6]. - They advocated for a focus on core technology innovation and vehicle safety performance improvement to enhance the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive industry [6].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement from Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile aims to clarify the recent controversy surrounding the crash test of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing the importance of transparency in automotive testing and brand protection [1][10]. Summary by Sections Li Auto's Position - The purpose of the crash test was to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, not to target the safety and quality of other brands [2][10]. - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image due to the test and the subsequent public misunderstanding [2][10]. - The company committed to taking further measures to prevent similar controversies in the future [3][12]. China Automotive Engineering Research Institute's Position - As the executing agency for the test, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute acknowledged its failure to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle was used as a "mobile barrier" and that the test did not evaluate its safety or quality [5][13]. - The institute apologized for the lack of key information that led to public misunderstanding and pledged to improve its testing management mechanisms [5][13]. Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile's Position - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and core technology enhancement [6][14][15]. - The company stated its dedication to lawful and compliant operations while contributing to the transformation of China from a major automotive country to a strong automotive nation [6][14][15]. Joint Initiatives - The three parties called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, urging adherence to integrity and commercial ethics in product development, testing, and promotion [8][16]. - They emphasized the need to focus on core technology innovation and improving vehicle safety performance to enhance the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive industry [8][16]. - The parties expressed their willingness to collaborate with the industry to build a sustainable automotive ecosystem based on safety, technology, and integrity [8][17].